Shape models and object recognition

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1681, Issue , 1999, Pages 31-57

  Ponce, Jean ^a   Cepeda, Martha ^a   Pae, Sung Il ^a   Sullivan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947982602     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46805-6_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (120)

1. G.J. Agin. Representation and description of curved objects. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1972.
2. V.I. Arnol’d. Singularities of smooth mappings. Russian Math. Surveys, pages 3-44, 1969.
3. H. Asada and J.M. Brady. The curvature primal sketch. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 8 (1):2-14, 1986.
4. N. Ayache and O. Faugeras. Hyper: a new approach for the recognition and positioning of two-dimensional objects. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 8 (1):44-54, January 1986.
5. A.H. Barr. Superquadrics and angle preserving transformations. IEEE Computer-Graphics and Applications, 1:11-23, January 1981.
6. J. Barraquand and M. Berthod. A non-linear second order edge detector. In International Image Week, Second Image Symposium, Nice, France, 1986.
7. J. Barraquand, B. Langlois, and J.C. Latombe. Robot motion planning with many degrees of freedom and dynamic constraints. In Int. Symp. on Robotics Research, pages 74-83, Tokyo, Japan, 1989. Preprints.
8. R. Basri, D. Roth, and D. Jacobs. Clustering apperance of 3D objects. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pages 414-420, Santa Barbara, CA, June 1998.
9. B.G. Baumgart. Geometric modeling for computer vision. Technical Report AIM-249, Stanford University, 1974. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Computer Science.
10. P.N. Belhumeur, J.P. Hesphanha, and D.J. Kriegman. Eigengaces vs. Fisherfaces: recognition using class-specific linear projection. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 19 (7):711-720, 1997.
11. R. Bergevin and M. Levine. Part decomposition of objects from single view line drawings. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 55 (3):17-34, 1992.
12. I. Biederman. Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Comp. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 32 (1):29-73, 1985.
13. T.O. Binford. Visual perception by computer. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Systems and Control, 1971.
14. T.O. Binford. Body-centered representation and recognition. In M. Hebert, J. Ponce, T.E. Boult, and A. Gross, editors, Object Representation for Computer Vision, number 994 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 207-215. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
15. T.O. Binford and T.S. Levitt. Quasi-invariants: theory and applications. In Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pages 819-829, 1993.
16. H. Blum. A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape. In W. Wathen-Dunn, editor, Models for perception of speech and visual form. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967.
17. R.A. Brooks. Symbolic reasoning among 3-D models and 2-D images. Artificial Intelligence, 17 (1-3):285-348, 1981.
18. R.A. Brooks, R. Greiner, and T.O. Binford. Model-based three-dimensional interpretation of two-dimensional images. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 105-113, Tokyo, Japan, Aug. 1979.
19. J.W. Bruce, P.J. Giblin, and F. Tari. Parabolic curves of evolving surfaces. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 17 (3):291-306, 1996.
20. B. Burns, R. Weiss, and E. Riseman. The non-existence of general-case view-invariants. In Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, pages 120-131. MIT Press, 1992.
21. M. Cepeda. Generalized cylinders revisited: theoretical results and preliminary implementation. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998.
22. B. Chiyokura and F. Kimura. Design of solids with free-form surfaces. Computer-Graphics, 17 (3):289-298, Nov. 1983.
23. D.T. Clemens and D.W. Jacobs. Model group indexing for recognition. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 13 (10):1007-1017, 1991.
24. J.L. Crowley and A.C. Parker. A representation of shape based on peaks and ridges in the difference of low-pass transform. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 6:156-170, 1984.
25. S. Dickinson, A.P. Pentland, and A. Rosenfeld. 3D shape recovery using distributed aspect matching. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 14 (2):174-198, 1992.
26. R. Duda and P. Hart. Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, 1973.
27. G. Eberly, R. Gardner, B. Morse, S. Pizer, and C. Scharlach. Ridges for image analysis. Technical report, Univ. of North Carolina, Dept. of Comp. Sc., 1993.
28. D. Eggert and K. Bowyer. Computing the orthographic projection aspect graph of solids of revolution. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on Interpretation of 3D Scenes, pages 102-108, Austin, TX, November 1989.
29. D. Eggert, K. Bowyer, C. Dyer, H. Christensen, and D. Goldgof. The scale space aspect graph. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Ma, ch. Intell., 15 (11):1114-1130, 1993.
30. G. Farin. Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1993.
31. O.D. Faugeras and M. Hebert. The representation, recognition, and locating of 3-D objects. International Journal of Robotics Research, 5 (3):27-52, Fall 1986.
32. D. Forsyth. Recognizing an algebraic surface from its outline. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 18 (1):21-40, April 1996.
33. D.A. Forsyth and M.M. Fleck. Body plans. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pages 678-683, San Juan, PR, June 1997.
34. J.M. Gauch and S.M. Pizer. Multiresolution analysis of ridges and valleys in grey-scale images. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 15(6), June 1993.
35. Z. Gigus, J. Canny, and R. Seidel. Efficiently computing and representing aspect graphs of polyhedral objects. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 13(6), June 1991.
36. W.E.L. Grimson and T. Lozano-Perez. Localizing overlapping parts by searching the interpretation tree. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 9 (4):469-482, 1987.
37. R.M. Haralick. Ridges and valleys in digital images. Comp. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 22:28-38, 1983.
38. R.M. Haralick and L.G. Shapiro. Computer and robot vision. Addison Wesley, 1992.
39. R.M. Haralick, L.T. Watson, and T.J. Laffey. The topographic primal sketch. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2:50-72, 1983.
40. th Alvey Vision Conference, pages 189-192, Manchester, UK, 1988.
41. G. Healey and D. Slater. Global color constancy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11 (11):3003-3010, 1994.
42. M. Hebert, J. Ponce, T.E. Boult, A. Gross, and D. Forsyth. Report on the NSF/ARPA workshop on 3D object representation for computer vision. In M. Hebert, J. Ponce, T.E. Boult, and A. Gross, editors, Object Representation for Computer Vision, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1995. Also available through the World-Wide Web at the following address: //www.ius.cs.cmu.edu/usr/users/hebert/www/workshop/report.html.
43. D.D. Hoffman and W. Richards. Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18:65-96, 1984.
44. J. Hollerbach. Hierarchical shape description of objects by selection and modification of prototypes. AI Lab. TR-346, MIT, 1975.
45. R. Horaud and J.M. Brady. On the geometric interpretation of image contours. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, London, U.K., June 1987.
46. D.P. Huttenlocher and S. Ullman. Object recognition using alignment. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, pages 102-111, London, U.K., June 1987.
47. Y.L. Kergosien. La famille des projections orthogonales d’une surface et ses singularités. C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris, 292:929-932, 1981.
48. B.B. Kimia, A.R. Tannenbaum, and S.W. Zucker. The shape triangle: parts, protrusions and bends. Technical Report TR-92-15, McGill University Research Center for Intelligent Machines, 1992.
49. B.B. Kimia, A.R. Tannenbaum, and S.W. Zucker. Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: the components of shape and the reaction-diffusion space. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 15:189-224, 1995.
50. J.J. Koenderink. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception, 13:321-330, 1984.
51. J.J. Koenderink. Solid Shape. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
52. J.J. Koenderink and A.J. Van Doorn. The singularities of the visual mapping. Biological Cybernetics, 24:51-59, 1976.
53. J.J. Koenderink and A.J. Van Doorn. The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biological Cybernetics, 32:211-216, 1979.
54. J.J. Koenderink and A.J. Van Doorn. Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biological Cybernetics, 55:367-375, 1987.
55. J.J. Koenderink and A.J. Van Doorn. Local features of smooth shapes: Ridges and courses. In Geometric Methods in Computer Vision II, pages 2-13, 1993.
56. D.J. Kriegman and J. Ponce. Computing exact aspect graphs of curved objects: solids of revolution. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 5 (2):119-135, 1990.
57. D.J. Kriegman and J. Ponce. A new curve tracing algorithm and some applications. In P.J. Laurent, A. Le Méhauté, and L.L. Schumaker, editors, Curves and Surfaces, pages 267-270. Academic Press, New York, 1991.
58. M. Leyton. A process grammar for shape. Artificial Intelligence, 34:213-247, 1988.
59. J. Liu, J.L. Mundy, D. Forsyth, A. Zisserman, and C. Rothwell. Efficient recognition of rotationally symmetric surfaces and straight homogeneous generalized cylinders. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pages 123-128, New York City, NY, 1993.
60. C. Loop. Smooth spline surfaces over irregular meshes. Computer Graphics, pages 303-310, Aug. 1994.
61. W. Lorensen and H. Cline. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics, 21:163-169, 1987.
62. D. Lowe. The viewpoint consistency constraint. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 1 (1):57-72, 1987.
63. D. Lowe and T.O. Binford. Segmentation and aggregation: An approach to figure-ground phenomena. In Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pages 168-178, 1982.
64. A. Mackworth and F. Mokhtarian. The renormalized curvature scale space and the evolution properties of planar curves. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pages 318-326, 1988.
65. D. Marr. Vision. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
66. D. Marr and K. Nishihara. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. Royal Society, London, B-200:269-294, 1978.
67. A.P. Morgan. Solving Polynomial Systems using Continuation for Engineering and Scientific Problems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
68. Y. Moses and S. Ullman. Limitations of non model-based recognition schemes. In Proc. European Conf. Comp. Vision, pages 820-828, 1992.
69. J.L. Mundy and A. Zisserman. Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.
70. J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, and D. Forsyth. Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, volume 825 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
71. H. Murase and S. Nayar. Visual learning and recognition of 3D objects from appearance. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 14 (1):5-24, 1995.
72. V.S. Nalwa. Line-drawing interpretation: bilateral symmetry. In Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pages 956-967, Los Angeles, CA, February 1987.
73. V.S. Nalwa. A guided tour of computer vision. Addison Wesley, 1993.
74. R. Nevatia and T.O. Binford. Description and recognition of complex curved objects. Artificial Intelligence, 8:77-98, 1977.
75. Quang-Loc Nguyen and M.D. Levine. Representing 3D objects in range images using geons. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 63 (1):158-168, January 1996.
76. A. Noble, D. Wilson, and J. Ponce. On Computing Aspect Graphs of Smooth Shapes from Volumetric Data. Computer Vision and Image Understanding: special issue on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, 66 (2):179-192, 1997.
77. A.P. Pentland. Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artificial Intelligence, 28:293-331, 1986.
78. S. Petitjean. Geometrie enumerative et contacts de varietes lineaires: application aux graphes d’aspects d’objets courbes. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, 1995.
79. S. Petitjean, J. Ponce, and D.J. Kriegman. Computing exact aspect graphs of curved objects: Algebraic surfaces. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 9 (3):231-255, 1992.
80. J. Ponce. On characterizing ribbons and finding skewed symmetries. Comp. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 52:328-340, 1990.
81. J. Ponce. Straight homogeneous generalized cylinders: differential geometry and uniqueness results. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 4 (1):79-100, 1990.
82. J. Ponce and J.M. Brady. Toward a surface primal sketch. In T. Kanade, editor, Three-dimensional machine vision, pages 195-240. Kluwer Publishers, 1987.
83. J. Ponce and D. Chelberg. Finding the limbs and cusps of generalized cylinders. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 1 (3):195-210, October 1987.
84. J. Ponce, D. Chelberg, and W. Mann. Invariant properties of straight homogeneous generalized cylinders and their contours. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 11 (9):951-966, September 1989.
85. W. Richards, J.J. Koenderink, and D.D. Hoffman. Inferring 3D shapes from 2D codons. MIT AI Memo 840, MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab, 1985.
86. M. Richetin, M. Dhome, J.T. Lapreste, and G. Rives. Inverse perspective transform from zero-curvature curve points: Application to the localization of some generalized cylinders from a single view. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 13 (2):185-191, February 1991.
87. J.H. Rieger. On the classification of views of piecewise-smooth objects. Image and Vision Computing, 5:91-97, 1987.
88. J.H. Rieger. Global bifurcations sets and stable projections of non-singular algebraic surfaces. Int. J. of Comp. Vision, 7 (3):171-194, 1992.
89. L.G. Roberts. Machine perception of three-dimensional solids. In J.T. Tippett et al., editor, Optical and Electro-Optical Information Processing, pages 159-197. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1965.
90. A. Rosenfeld. Axial representations of shape. Comp. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 33:156-173, 1986.
91. R. Rothe. Darstellende Geometrie des Geländes. 1914.
92. De Saint-Venant. Surfaces à plus grande pente constituées sur des lignes courbes. Bulletin de la soc. philomath. de Paris, March 1852.
93. H. Sato and T.O. Binford. Finding and recovering SHGC objects in an edge image. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 57:346-358, 1993.
94. C. Schmid and R. Mohr. Local grayvalue invariants for image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 19 (5):530-535, May 1997.
95. J. Serra. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, New York, 1982.
96. J.A. Sethian. Level set methods: evolving interfaces in geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision and materials sciences. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
97. S.A. Shafer. Shadows and Silhouettes in Computer Vision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1985.
98. S.A. Shafer and T. Kanade. The theory of straight homogeneous generalized cylinders and a taxonomy of generalized cylinders. Technical Report CMU-CS-83-105, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1983.
99. I. Shimshoni and J. Ponce. Finite-resolution aspect graphs of polyhedral objects. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Ma, ch. Intell., 19 (4):315-327, 1997.
100. L. Shirman and C. Sequin. Local surface interpolation with Bezier patches. CAGD, 4:279-295, 1987.
101. K. Siddiqi and B.B. Kimia. Parts of visual form: computational aspects. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Ma, ch. Intell., 17 (3):239-251, March 1995.
102. D. Slater and G. Healey. Recognizing 3-d objects using local color invariants. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Ma, ch. Intell., 18 (2):206-210, 1996.
103. B.I. Soroka and R. Bajcsy. Generalized cylinders from cross-sections. In Third Int. J. Conf. Patt. Recog., pages 734-735, 1976.
104. D. Stam. Distributed homotopy continuation and its application to robotic grasping. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1992. Beckman Institute Tech. Report UIUC-BI-AI-RCV-92-03.
105. J. Stewman and K.W. Bowyer. Creating the perspective projection aspect graph of polyhedral objects. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, pages 495-500, Tampa, FL, 1988.
106. S. Sullivan and J. Ponce. Automatic model construction, pose estimation, and object recognition from photographs using triangular splines. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, pages 510-516, 1998.
107. S. Sullivan and J. Ponce. Automatic model construction, pose estimation, and object recognition from photographs using triangular splines. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 20(10), Oct. 1998. In press.
108. S. Sullivan, L. Sandford, and J. Ponce. Using geometric distance fits for 3D object modelling and recognition. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 16 (12):1183-1196, December 1994.
109. J.P. Thirion and G. Gourdon. The 3D marching lines algorithm: new results and proofs. Technical Report 1881-1, INRIA, 1993.
110. R.Y. Tsai. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras. Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-3(4):323-344, 1987.
111. M. Turk and A.P. Pentland. Face recognition using eigenfaces. J. of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1), 1991.
112. S. Ullman and R. Basri. Recognition by linear combination of models. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 13 (10):992-1006, 1991.
113. F. Ulupinar and R. Nevatia. Using symmetries for analysis of shape from contour. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comp. Vision, pages 414-426, Tampa, FL, December 1988.
114. C.E. Weatherburn. Differential geometry. Cambridge University Press, 1927.
115. I. Weiss. Projective invariants of shapes. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pages 291-297, Ann Arbor, MI, 1988.
116. M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. Psychol. Forsch., 4:301-350, 1923. English translation in: W.B. Ellis, A source book of Gestalt psychology pages 71-88, 1973.
117. A.P. Witkin. Scale-space filtering. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1019-1022, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1983.
118. M. Zerroug and G. Medioni. The challenge of generic object recongnition. In M. Hebert, J. Ponce, T.E. Boult, and A. Gross, editors, Object Representation for Computer Vision, number 994 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 217-232. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
119. M. Zerroug and R. Nevatia. Using invariance and quasi-invariance for the segmentation and recovery of curved objects. In J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, and D. Forsyth, editors, Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, volume 825 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 317-340. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
120. A. Zisserman, D.A. Forsyth, J.L. Mundy, and C.A. Rothwell. Recognizing general curved objects efficiently. In J. Mundy and A. Zisserman, editors, Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, pages 228-251. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.