An argumentation based framework for defeasible and qualitative reasoning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1159, Issue , 1996, Pages 1-10

  Karacapilidis, Nikos I ^a   Papadias, Dimitris ^a   Gordon, Thomas F ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; INFERENCE MECHANISM; MULTI-AGENT SETTING; QUALITATIVE REASONING; VALUE LOGIC;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84947934703     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61859-7_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. Communications of the ACM 26 (11), 1983, pp. 832-843.
2. Bench-Capon, TV.: Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law. In J.C. Hage, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, M.J. Cohen and H.J. van den Herik (eds.), Legal knowledge based systems-Telecommunication and Al & Law, Koninklijke Vermande BV, Lelystad, 1995, pp. 5-14.
3. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: How to infer from inconsistent beliefs without revising? In Proceedings of the 14th IJCAI, Montreal, 1995, pp. 1449-1455.
4. Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment. In Proceedings of the 13th IJCAI, Chambery, 1993, pp. 640-645.
5. Brewka, G.: Preferred Subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In Proceedings of the 11th IJCAI, Detroit, 1989, pp. 1043-1048.
6. Brewka, G.: Reasoning about Priorities in Default Logic. In Proceedings of the 12th AAAI, Seattle, 1994, pp. 940-945.
7. Brewka, G.: A Reconstruction of Rescher's Theory of Formal Disputation Based on Default Logic. In Working Notes of the 12th AAAI Workshop on Computational Dialectics, Seattle, 1994, pp. 15-27.
8. Brewka, G., Gordon, T.: How to Buy a Porsche: An Approach to Defeasible Decision Making. In Working Notes of the 12th AAAI Workshop on Computational Dialectics, Seattle, 1994, pp. 28-38.
9. Cayrol, C.: On the Relation between Argumentation and Non-monotonic Coherence-Based Entailment. In Proceedings of the 14th IJCAI, Montreal, 1995, pp. 1443-1448.
10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning and logic programming. In Proceedings of the 13th IJCAI, Chambery, 1993, pp. 852-857.
11. Geffner, H., Pearl, J.: Conditional Entailment: Bridging two Approaches to Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 53 (2-3), 1992, pp. 209-244.
12. Gordon, T.: The Pleadings Game: An Exercise in Computational Dialectics. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(4), 1994, pp, 239-292.
13. Karacapilidis, N.I.: Planning under Uncertainty: A Qualitative Approach. In Ç. Pinto-Ferreira and N.J. Mamede (eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 990, Springer-Verlag, 1995, pp. 285-296.
14. Karacapilidis, N.I., Gordon, T.: Dialectical Planning. In Proceedings of the 14th IJCAI Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Montreal, 1995, pp. 239250.
15. Kunz, W., Rittel, H.W.J.: Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Working Paper 131, Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Grundlagen der Plannung, 1970.
16. Pinkas, G.: Propositional Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Inconsistency in Symmetric Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 12th IJCAI, Sydney, 1991, pp. 525-530.
17. Pollock, J.: Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science 11, 1988, pp. 481-518.
18. Prakken, H.: Logical tools for modelling legal argument. Ph.D. Dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam, 1993.
19. Prakken, H.: From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on AI and Law, ACM Press, 1995, pp. 165-174.
20. Reiter, R.: A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980, pp. 81132.
21. Rescher, N.: Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1977.
22. Sian, S.S.: Adaptation based on cooperative learning in multi-agent systems. In Y. Demazeau and J.P. Müller (eds.), Decentralized AI 2, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991, pp. 257-272.
23. Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P.: A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (2-3), 1992, pp, 125-157.
24. Sycara, K.: Resolving Goal Conflicts via Negotiation. In Proceedings of the 7th AAAI, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 1988, pp. 245-250.
25. Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
26. Vreeswijk, G.: Studies in Defeasible Argumentation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam, 1993.
27. Yakemovic, K.C.B., Conklin, E.J.: Report on a Development Project Use of an Issue-Based Information System. In F. Halasz (ed.), Proceedings of CSCW 90, LA, 1990, pp. 105-118.