Complex argumentation in judicial decisions. Analysing conflicting arguments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1085, Issue , 1996, Pages 464-479

  Plug, José ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947922074     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61313-7_94     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aamio, A. 1987 The Rational as Reasonable. A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.
2. Alexy, R. 1989 A theory of legal Argumentation. The theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon press.
3. Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst 1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin/New York: Foris/De Gruyter.
4. Eemeren, F.H. van (et al.) 1991 Argumenteren voor juristen. Het analyseren en schrijven van juridische teksten en beleidsteksten. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
5. Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst 1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale:
6. Erlbaum. Feteris, E.T. 1992 ‘Discussies in an juridisch proces: an pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 14, pp. 44-54.
7. Franken, H. 1982 ‘Van rechtspleging tot rechtsbescherming’. RM Themis, 5/6, pp. 450-461.
8. Franken, H. (et al.) 1995 Inleiden tot de rechtswetenschap. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 7th. ed.
9. MacCormick, D.N. 1978 Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. MacCormick, D.N. en R.S. Summers, 1991 ‘Interpretation and Justification’. In: MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers, (eds.) Interpreting Statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 511-545.
11. Plug, H.J. 1994 ‘Reconstructing complex argumentation in judicial decisions’. In: F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (eds.), Studies in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 246-254, Ch. 22.
12. Plug, H.J. 1995 ‘The rational reconstruction of additional considerations in judicial decisions’. In: F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst et al. (eds.), Special Fields and Cases. Proc. of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat pp. 61-73.
13. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., 1992 Analysing complex argumentation. The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Sicsat, Amsterdam, ‘Dissertation Amsterdam’.
14. Summers, R.S. en M. Taruffo, 1991 ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’. In: MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers, (eds.) Interpreting Statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 461-510.
15. Veegens, D.J. 1989 Cassatie in burgerlijke zaken. (3rd. ed. revised by E. Korthals Altes & H.A. Groen). Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.