Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 22, 2015, Pages 3625-3630

  Gierliński, Marek ^a   Cole, Christian ^a   Schofield, Pietà ^a   Schurch, Nicholas J ^a   Sherstnev, Alexander ^a   Singh, Vijender ^a   Wrobel, Nicola ^b   Gharbi, Karim ^b   Simpson, Gordon ^a   Owen Hughes, Tom ^a   Blaxter, Mark ^b   Barton, Geoffrey J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BASE SEQUENCE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA;

EID: 84947809158     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv425     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anders,S. and Huber,W. (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol., 11, R106.
2. Anders,S. et al. (2014) HTSeq - a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 31, 166-169.
3. Auer,P.L. and Doerge,R.W. (2010) Statistical design and analysis of RNA sequencing data. Genetics, 185, 405-416.
4. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser B Methodol., 57, 289-300.
5. D'Agostino,R.B. et al. (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am. Stat., 44, 316-321.
6. Dillies,M.A. et al. (2013) A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform, 14, 671-683.
7. Fisher,R.A. (1950) The significance of deviations from expectation in a poisson series. Biometrics, 6, 17-24.
8. Flicek,P. et al. (2011) Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D800-D806.
9. Hansen,K.D. et al. (2011) Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability. Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 572-573.
10. Hardcastle,T.J. and Kelly,K.A. (2010) baySeq: empirical Bayesian methods for identifying differential expression in sequence count data. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 422.
11. Jiang,L. et al. (2011) Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome Res., 21, 1543-1551.
12. Kim,D. et al. (2013) TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol., 14, R36.
13. Loven,J. et al. (2012) Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell, 151, 476-482.
14. Marioni,J.C. et al. (2008) RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res., 18, 1509-1517.
15. Meintanis,S. (2005) Transform methods for testing the negative binomial hypothesis. Statistica, 65, 293-300.
16. Mortazavi,A. et al. (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods, 5, 621-628.
17. Nagalakshmi,U. et al. (2010) RNA-Seq: a method for comprehensive transcriptome analysis. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. Chapter 4, Unit 4, 11, 11-13.
18. Rapaport,F. et al. (2013) Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol., 14, R95.
19. Robinson,M.D. and Oshlack,A. (2010) A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol., 11, R25.
20. Robinson,M.D. and Smyth,G.K. (2008) Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data. Biostatistics, 9, 321-332.
21. Robinson,M.D. et al. (2010) edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 26, 139-140.
22. Schurch,N.J. et al. (2015) Evaluation of differential gene expression tools on a two-condition, 48 replicate RNA-seq experiment in preparation (preprint arXiv:1505.02017).
23. Smyth,G.K. (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 3, 1-25.
24. Trapnell,C. et al. (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 511-515.