Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 104, Issue , 2015, Pages 213-223

  Baydar, G ^a   Ciliz, N ^a   Mammadov, A ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cleaner production; Life cycle assessment; Organic agriculture; Textile industry

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS; AGRICULTURE; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; COTTON; CULTIVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUTROPHICATION; GLOBAL WARMING; HOSIERY MANUFACTURE; NITROGEN FERTILIZERS; POLLUTION CONTROL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TEXTILE FIBERS; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TEXTILES;

CLEANER PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; EUTROPHICATION POTENTIALS; GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS; ORGANIC AGRICULTURE; SUSTAINABLE RAW MATERIALS;

LIFE CYCLE;

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL; FERTILIZER; NITROGEN; OZONE; PHOSPHORUS; WATER;

CLEANER PRODUCTION; CLOTHING INDUSTRY; COTTON; CULTIVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HARVESTING; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PROCESSING; TEXTILE INDUSTRY;

ACIDIFICATION; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; BLEACHING; CLOTHING; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; COTTON; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EUTROPHICATION; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HARVEST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAND BIOME; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; ORGANIC FARMING; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); YARN;

TURKEY;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 84947777489     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: 18790658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. J.M. Allwood, C.M. de Rodríguez, S.E. Laursen, and N.M.P. Bocken Well Dressed? The Present and Future Sustainability of Clothing and Textiles in the United Kingdom 2006 University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing Cambridge, U.K.
2. A.S. Aly, A.B. Moustafa, and A. Hebeish Bio-technological treatment of cellulosic textiles J. Clean. Prod. 12 2004 697 705
3. W.S. Anthony, and W.D. Mayfield Cotton Ginners Handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Handbook Number 503 1994 Government Printing Office Washington, D.C.
4. A. Barber, and G. Pellow Life Cycle Assessment: The New Zealand Merino Industry - Merino Wool Total Energy Use and Carbondioxide Emissions 2006 The AgriBusiness Group Auckland, New Zealand
5. J.G. Bralla Handbook of Manufacturing Processes - How Products, Components and Materials are Made 1st ed. 2007 Industrial Press U.S.A.
6. F. Brentrup, J. Kiisters, J. Lammel, and H. Kuhlmann Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector Int. J. LCA 6 2000 349 357
7. BTTG Report 5: Waste Minimisation and Best Practice 1999 British Textile Technology Group Manchester, U.K.
8. M. Canakci, M. Topakci, I. Akinci, and A. Ozmerzi Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: case study for Antalya region, Turkey Energy Convers. Manag. 46 2005 655 666
9. A. Catchot Cotton Insect Control Guide 2007 Extension Service of Mississippi State University cooperating with U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S.A.
10. M.R. Chaudhry Harvesting and Ginning of Cotton in the World 1997 International Cotton Advisory Committee Washington, D.C.
11. N. Cherrett, J. Barrett, A. Clemett, and M.J. Chadwick Ecological Footprint and Water Analysis of Cotton, Hemp and Polyester 2005 BioRegional Development Group and World Wide Fund for Nature Switzerland (Cymru Report)
12. M. Collins, and S. Aumônier Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment of Two Marks & Spencer plc Apparel Products 2002 Environmental Resources Management England
13. L. Dahllöf Methodological Issues in the LCA Procedure for the Textile Sector - A Case Study Concerning Fabric for a Sofa 2004 Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden
14. Danish Ministry of Environment Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment - The EDIP2003 Methodology 2005 Environmental News No. 80 Denmark
15. EC Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry 2001 European Commission Seville, Spain (February)
16. EC Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry 2001 European Commission Seville, Spain (February)
17. FAO-ICAC World Apparel Fiber Consumption Survey 2013 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Cotton Advisory Committee Washington, D.C., USA
18. FAO-ICAC Measuring Sustainability in Cotton Farming Systems 2015 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Cotton Advisory Committee Rome, Italy
19. M. Guerena, and P. Sullivan Organic Cotton Production 2003 National Center for Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas U.S.A. (http://www.organicexchange.org) (accessed 11.08)
20. M. Hauschild, and H. Wenzel Life Cycle Assessment - Environmental Assessment of Products 2000 CRC Press LLC Denmark 155 189
21. ICAC Organic Cotton Production II 1994 International Cotton Advisory Committee Washington, D.C.
22. M. Ingram Producing the natural fiber naturally: technological change and the US organic cotton industry Agric. Hum. Values 19 2002 325 336
23. E.M. Kalliala, and P. Nousianinen Life Cycle Assessment Environmental Profile of Cotton and Polyester-Cotton Fabrics AUTEX Res. J. 1 1 1999 8 20
24. E. Koç, and E. Kaplan An investigation on energy consumption in yarn production with special reference to ring spinning Fibres Text. East. Eur. 15 4 2007 63
25. K. Kooistra, and A. Termorshuizen The Sustainability of Cotton: Consequences for Man and Environment 2006 Science Shop Wageningen University & Research Centre The Netherlands (Report 223)
26. K. Kooistra, and A. Termorshuizen The Sustainability of Cotton: Consequences for Man and Environment 2006 Science Shop Wageningen University & Research Centre The Netherlands (Report 223)
27. S.Y. Lakhal, H. Sidibe, and S. H'Mida Comparing conventional and certified organic cotton supply chains: the case of Mali Int. J. Agric. Res. Gov. Ecol. 7 2008 243 255
28. S.E. Laursen, J. Bagh, J. Bagh, O.K. Jensen, and I. Werther Environmental Assessment of Textiles - Life Cycle Screening of the Production of Textiles Containing Cotton, Wool, Viscose, Polyester or Arcylic Fibres 1997 Ministry of Environment and Energy, Danish Environmental Protection Agency Denmark (Miljoproject no. 20)
29. N. Morley, S. Slater, S. Russell, M. Tipper, and G.D. Ward Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste 2006 Salvation Army Trading Company Ltd, Oakdene Hollins Ltd., Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd Leeds, UK (WRT152, September)
30. OE Organic Cotton Fiber Report 2006 Organic Exchange http://textileexchange.org
31. OE Organic Farm and Fiber Report 2007 Organic Exchange http://textileexchange.org
32. OE Organic Cotton Farm and Fiber Report 2008 Organic Exchange http://textileexchange.org
33. OE Soil Fertility Management, Discussion Draft 2008 Organic Exchange http://textileexchange.org
34. M. Proto, S. Supino, and O. Malandrino Cotton: a flow cycle to exploit Ind. Crops Prod. 11 2000 173 178
35. M.D. Saxce, C. Pesnel, and A. Perwuelz LCA of bed sheets - some relevant parameters for lifetime assessment J. Clean. Prod. 37 2012 221 228
36. SBN, 2008. Sustainable business network. (http://sustainable.org.nz)
37. J.C. Silvertooth Cotton 2002 International Fertilizer Association Paris, France (www.fertilizer.org/ifa) (accessed 07.09)
38. J. Soth, C. Grasser, and R. Salerno The Impact of Cotton on Fresh Water Resources and Ecosystems: A Preliminary Analysis 1999 World Wide Fund for Nature Gland, Switzerland
39. P. Ton Organic Cotton: An Opportunity for Trade 2007 International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO (ITC) Geneva, Switzerland (Technical Paper, Doc. No. MDS-07.121.E)
40. TUIK, 2013. Turkey's Statistical Yearbook 2013, Istanbul, Turkey.
41. U.S.EPA Profile of the Textile Industry, Sector Notebook Project 1997 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Washington, D.C. (EPA/310-R-97-009)
42. UNCTAD, 2002a. United Nations conference on trade and development. (http://r0.unctad.org/infocomm/anglais/cotton/crop.htm) (accessed 08.09).
43. UNCTAD, 2002b. United Nations conference on trade and development. (http://r0.unctad.org/infocomm/anglais/cotton/crop.htm) (accessed 08.09).
44. USDA Cotton: World Markets and Trade 2015 Unites States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service U.S.A.
45. A.C. Woolridg, G.D. Ward, P.S. Phillips, M. Collins, and S. Gandy Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: an UK energy saving perspective Res. Conserv. Recycl. 46 2006 94 103
46. I. YIlmaz, H. Akcaoz, and B. Ozkan An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey Renew. Energy 30 2005 145 155
47. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY, Savenije HHG, Gautam R. The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol Econ 2006;60:186-203.