Information fusion in logic: A brief overview

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1244, Issue , 1997, Pages 86-95

  Cholvy, Laurence ^a   Hunter, Anthony ^b  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

COGNITIVE TASK; KNOWLEDGE BASE;

INFORMATION FUSION;

EID: 84947720060     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0035614     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. A Anderson and N Belnap. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Princeton University Press, 1975.
2. C Alchourron, P Gardenfors, and D Makinson. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contraction and revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50:513-530, 1985.
3. A Arruda. On the imaginary logic of NA Vasilev. In A Arruda, N Da Costa, and R Chuaqui, editors, Non-classical logics, model theory and computability. North Holland, 1977.
4. D Batens. Paraconsistent extensional propositional logics. Logique et Analyse, 90-91:195-234, 1980.
5. S Benferhat, C Cayrol, D Dubois, J Lang, and H Prade. Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
6. S Benferhat, D Dubois, and H Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1449-1445. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
7. S Benferhat, D Dubois, and H Prade. A logical approach to reasoning under inconsistency in stratified knowledge bases. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, volume 956 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 36-43. Springer, 1995.
8. N Belnap. A useful four-valued logic. In G Epstein, editor, Modern Uses of Multiple-valued Logic, pages 8-37. Reidel, 1977.
9. Ph Besnard. An Introduction to Default Logic. Springer, 1989.
10. Ph Besnard. Paraconsistent logic approach to knowledge representation. In M de Glas M and D Gabbay D, editors, Proceedings of the First World Conference on Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence, pages 107-114. Angkor, 1991.
11. Ph Besnard and A Hunter. Quasi-classical logic: Non-trivializable classical reasoning from inconsistent information. In C Froidevaux and J Kohlas, editors, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Uncertainty, volume 946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 44-51, 1995.
12. Ph Besnard and A Hunter. Introduction to actual and potential contradictions. In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management, volume 3. Kluwer, 1997.
13. Baral, S. Kraus, J. Minker, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Combining multiple knowledge bases. IEEE Trans, on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 3(2), 1991.
14. C Baral, S Kraus, J Minker, and V Subrahmanian. Combining knowledgebases of first-order theories. Computational Intelligence, 8:45-71, 1992.
15. G Brewka. Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1043-1048, 1989.
16. G Brewka. Common-sense Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
17. L. Cholvy and F. Cuppens. Solving normative conflicts by merging roles. In Proceedings of the fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Washington, May 1995.
18. F. Cuppens and R. Demolombe. How to recognize interesting topics to provide cooperative answering. Information Systems, 14(2), 1989.
19. S. Cazalens and R. Demolombe. Intelligent access to data and knowledge bases via users’ topics of interest. In Proceedings of IFIP Conference, pages 245-251, 1992.
20. L. Cholvy and R. Demolombe. Reasoning with information sources ordered by topics. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence: Methods, Systems and Applications (AIMSA). World Scientific, Sofia, September 1994.
21. W Camielli, L Farinas, and M Marques. Contextual negations and reasoning with contradictions. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’91), 1991.
22. L. Cholvy. Proving theorems in a multi-sources environment. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 66-71, 1993.
23. L. Cholvy. A logical approach to multi-sources reasoning. In Proceedings of the Applied Logic Conference, number 808 in Lecture notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
24. L. Cholvy. Automated reasoning with merged contradictory information whose reliability depends on topics. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU), Fribourg, July 1995.
25. L. Cholvy. Reasoning about merged information. In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management, volume 1. Kluwer, 1997.
26. N C da Costa. On the theory of inconsistent formal systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15:497-510, 1974.
27. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade. Dealing with multi-source information in possibilistic logic. In Proceedings of ECAI, pages 38-42, 1992.
28. J Doyle. A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, 12:231-272, 1979.
29. D Dubois and H Prade. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management, volume 1. Kluwer, 1997.
30. M Elvang-Goransson and A Hunter. Argumentative logics: Reasoning from classically inconsistent information. Data and Knowledge Engineering Journal, 16:125-145, 1995.
31. A Finkelstein, D Gabbay, A Hunter, J Kramer, and B Nuseibeh. Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(8): 569-578, 1994.
32. L. Farinas and A. Herzig. Reasoning about database updates. In Jack Minker, editor, Workshop of Foundations of deductive databases and logic programming, 1986.
33. L. Farinas and A. Herzig. Revisions, updates and interference. In A. Fuhrmann and Rott H, editors, Proceedings of the n (LogIn-92. DeGruyter Publishers, 1992.
34. L. Farinas and A. Herzig. Interference logic = conditional logic + frame axiom. International JOurnal of Intelligent Systems, 9(1):119-130, 1994.
35. R Fagin, G Kuper, J Ullman, and M Vardi. Updating logical databases. Advances in Computing Research, 3:1-18, 1986.
36. P Gardenfors. Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, 1988.
37. D Gabbay and A Hunter. Making inconsistency respectable 1: A logical framework for inconsistency in reasoning. In Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence, volume 535 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1932. Springer, 1991.
38. D Gabbay and A Hunter. Making inconsistency respectable 2: Meta-level handling of inconsistent data. In Symbolic and Qualitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU‘93), volume 747 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 129-136. Springer, 1993.
39. D Gabbay and A Hunter. Negation and contradiction. In What is negation? Kluwer, 1997.
40. D Gabbay, C Hogger, and J Robinson. Handbook of Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, volume 3. Oxford University Press, 1994.
41. G. Grahne. A modal analysis of subjonctive queries. In R. demolombe, L. farinas, and T. Imielinski, editors, Workshop on nonstandard queries and answers, Toulouse, 1991.
42. A Hunter and B Nuseibeh. Analysing inconsistent specifications. In Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pages 78-86. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.
43. A Hunter. Intelligent text handling using default logic. In Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (TAI’96), pages 34-40. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996.
44. A Hunter. Paraconsistent logics. In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management. Kluwer, 1997.
45. J De Kleer. An assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence, 28:127-162, 1986.
46. H Katsuno and A Medelzon. A unified view of prepositional knowledgebase updates. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1989.
47. F Lin. Reasoning in the presence of inconsistency. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’87), 1987.
48. J Lin. A logic for reasoning consistently in the presence of inconsistency. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.
49. A. Motro. A formal framework for integrating inconsistent answers from multiple information sources. Technical Report ISSE-TR-93-106, George Mason University, 1993.
50. R Manor and N Rescher. On inferences from inconsistent information. Theory and Decision, 1:179-219, 1970.
51. J Martins and S Shapiro. A model of belief revision. Artificial Intelligence, 35:25-79, 1988.
52. J Meyer and W van der Hoek. Modal logics for representing incoherent knowledge. In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management, Volume 3. Kluwer, 1997.
53. D Poole. A logical framework for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 36:27-47, 1985.
54. G Priest and R Routley. Introduction: Paraconsistent logics. Studia Logica, 43:3-16, 1984.
55. H Prakken. An argument framework for default reasoning. In Annals of mathematics and artificial intelligence, volume 9, 1993.
56. G Priest, R Routley, and J Norman. Paraconsistent logic. Philosophia, 1988.
57. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. On the relation between legal language and legal argument: assumptions, applicability and dynamic priorities. In Proc. Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, University of Maryland, May, 1995.
58. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. A system for defeasible argumentation with defeasible prorities. In Proc. of FAPR’96, May, 1996.
59. L. Royakkers and F. Dignum. Defeasible reasoning with legal rules. In Proc of DEON’96, Sesimbra. Springer, 1996.
60. N Roos. A logic for reasoning with inconsistent knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 57(1):69-104, 1993.
61. M Ryan. Representing defaults as sentences with reduced priority. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Third International Conference. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
62. Lea Sombe. Revision and updating in knowledgebases. Wiley, 1994.
63. Y Tan and L Vein der Torre. Why defeasible deontic logic needs a multi preference semantics. In Ch. froidevaux and J. Kohlas, editors, Quantitative and Qualitative Approches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, number 946 in Lectures notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 1995.
64. G Wagner. Ex contradictione nihil sequitur. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’91), 1991.
65. M Winslett. Updating logical databases. Cambridge University Press, 1990.