Faking nature

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 81-93

  Elliot, Robert ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947619641     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00201748208601955     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J. G. Mosley, ‘The Revegetation “Debate”: A Trap For Conservationists’, Australian Conservation Foundation Newsletter, Vol. 12 (1980), No. 8, p. 1.
2. Peter Dunk, ‘How New Engineering Can Work with the Environment’, Habitat Australia, Vol. 7 (1979), No. 5, p. 12.
3. See J. G. Mosley, Habitat Australia., p. 1.
4. See, e.g. Colin Radford, ‘Fakes’, Mind, Vol. 87 (1978), No. 345, pp. 66-76.
5. Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art, Bobbs-Merrill, New York 1968, pp. 99-122, though Radford and Goodman have different accounts of why genesis matters.
6. See Ch. 10 of Roderick Nash, Wilderness and the American Mind, Yale University Press, New Haven 1973.
7. See, e.g., Don Mannison, ‘A Prolegomenon to a Human Chauvinist Aesthetic’, in D. S. Mannison, M. A. McRobbie, R. Routley (Eds.), Environmental Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra 1980, pp. 212-216.
8. Val Routley, ‘Critical Notice of Passmore’s Man’s Responsibility for Nature’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 53 (1975), No. 2, pp. 171-185.
9. Holmes Rolston III, ‘Is There An Ecological Ethic’, Ethics, Vol. 85 (1975), No. 2, pp. 93-109.
10. For a discussion of this point with respect to art forgeries, see Nelson Goodman Ethics., esp. pp. 103-112.
11. For an excellent discussion of this same point with respect to artefacts, see Colin Radford, Colin Radford., esp. pp. 73-76.