What Difference Does Teaming Make?

Middle School Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 47-50

  Erb, Thomas O ^a   Stevenson, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947495196     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23276223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00940771.1999.11494587     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Erb, T. O., (1997). Thirty years of attempting to fathom teaming: Battling potholes and hairpin curves along the way. In T. S., Dickinson & T. O., Erb (Eds.). We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 19–59). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
2. Erb, T. O., & Dickinson, T. S., (1997). The future of teaming. In T. S., Dickinson & T. O., Erb (Eds.). We gain more than we give: Teaming in middle schools (pp. 525–540). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
3. Erb, T. O., & Doda, N. M., (1989). Team organization: Promise—practices and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
4. George, P. S., (1982). Interdisciplinary team organization: Four operational phases. Middle School Journal, 13 (3), 10–13.
5. Larson, C. E., & LaFasto, F. M. J., (1989). Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Plodzik, K. T., & George, P., (1989). Interdisciplinary team organization. Middle School Journal, 20 (5), 15–17.
7. Schwab, J. J., (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 501–522.
8. Stevenson, C., (1996). Partner teaming. VAMLE Focus, 1 (5), 1–2.(available from Fax on Demand, National Middle School Association, 1-888-329-6672)
9. Sullivan, K., (1996). Middle school program and participatory planning drive school design. Middle School Journal, 27 (4), 3–7.
10. Tuckman, B. W., (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.