A note on the false discovery rate of novel peptides in proteogenomics

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 20, 2015, Pages 3249-3253

  Zhang, Kun ^a,b   Fu, Yan ^c   Zeng, Wen Feng ^a,b   He, Kun ^a,b   Chi, Hao ^a   Liu, Chao ^a   Li, Yan Chang ^d   Gao, Yuan ^d   Xu, Ping ^d   He, Si Min ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^d National Engineering Research Center for Protein Drugs   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

CHEMISTRY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PROTEOMICS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84947491071     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv340     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blakeley, P. et al. (2012) Addressing statistical biases in nucleotide-derived protein databases for proteogenomic search strategies. J. Proteome Res., 11, 5221-5234.
2. Borchert, N. et al. (2010) Proteogenomics of Pristionchus pacificus reveals distinct proteome structure of nematode models. Genome Res., 20, 837-846.
3. Branca, R.M. et al. (2014) HiRIEF LC-MS enables deep proteome coverage and unbiased proteogenomics. Nat. Methods, 11, 59-62.
4. Brosch, M. et al. (2011) Shotgun proteomics aids discovery of novel proteincoding genes, alternative splicing, and "resurrected" pseudogenes in the mouse genome. Genome Res., 21, 756-767.
5. Chaerkady, R. et al. (2011) A proteogenomic analysis of anopheles gambiae using high-resolution fourier transform mass spectrometry. Genome Res., 21, 1872-1881.
6. de Souza, G.A. et al. (2008) High accuracy mass spectrometry analysis as a tool to verify and improve gene annotation using Mycobacterium tuberculosis as an example. BMC Genomics, 9, 316.
7. Elias, J.E., Gygi, S.P. (2007) Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods, 4, 207-214.
8. Fu, Y. (2012) Bayesian false discovery rates for post-translational modification proteomics. Stat. Interface, 5, 47-59.
9. Fu, Y., Qian, X. (2014) Transferred subgroup false discovery rate for rare post-translational modifications detected by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 13, 1359-1368.
10. Jaffe, J.D. et al. (2004) Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation. Proteomics, 4, 59-77.
11. Kall, L. et al. (2007) Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods, 4, 923-925.
12. Kelkar, D.S. et al. (2011) Proteogenomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by high resolutionmass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 10, M111 011627.
13. Kim, M.S. et al. (2014) A draft map of the human proteome. Nature, 509, 575-581.
14. Krug, K. et al. (2013) Deep coverage of the Escherichia coli proteome enables the assessment of false discovery rates in simple proteogenomic experiments. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 12, 3420-3430.
15. Merrihew, G.E. et al. (2008) Use of shotgun proteomics for the identification, confirmation, and correction of C. elegans gene annotations. Genome Res., 18, 1660-1669.
16. Nesvizhskii, A.I. (2014) Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies. Nat. Methods, 11, 1114-1125.
17. Renuse, S. et al. (2011) Proteogenomics. Proteomics, 11, 620-630.
18. Zhang, B. et al. (2014) Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature, 513, 382-387.