Nurse Family Partnership: Comparing Costs per Family in Randomized Trials Versus Scale-Up

Journal of Primary Prevention

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 419-425

  Miller, Ted R ^a,b   Hendrie, Delia ^b  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cost; Economies of scale; Home visitation; Operational program; Randomized trial

Indexed keywords

COST; ECONOMICS; FAMILY NURSING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOME VISIT; HUMAN; NURSE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POSTNATAL CARE; PRENATAL CARE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FAMILY NURSING; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; NURSES, COMMUNITY HEALTH; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; POSTNATAL CARE; PRENATAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84947486449     PISSN: 0278095X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10935-015-0406-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
2. Chatterji, P., Caffray, C. M., Jones, A. S., Lillie-Blanton, M., & Werthamer, L. (2001). Applying cost analysis methods to school-based prevention programs. Prevention Science,2(1), 45–55.
3. Cisler, R., Holder, H. D., Longabaugh, R., Stout, R. L., & Zweben, A. (1998). Actual and estimated replication costs for alcohol treatment modalities: Case study from project match. Journal of Studies on Alcohol,59(5), 503–512.
4. Crowley, D. M., Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M. T., Feinberg, M. E., & Spoth, R. L. (2012). Resource consumption of a diffusion model for prevention programs: The prosper delivery system. Journal of Adolescent Health,50(3), 256–263.
5. Foster, E. M., Dodge, K. A., & Jones, D. E. (2003). Issues in the economic evaluation of prevention programs. Applied Developmental Science,7(2), 76–86.
6. Ginexi, E. M., & Hilton, T. F. (2006). What’s next for translation research? Evaluation and the Health Professions,29(3), 334–347.
7. Glazner, J., Bondy, J., Luckey, D., & Olds, D. (2004). Final report to the administration for children and families: Effect of the nurse family partnership on government expenditures for vulnerable first-time mothers and their children in Elmira, New York, Memphis, Tennessee, and Denver, Colorado (#90XP0017). Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
8. Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine: Report of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9. Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Henderson Jr, C. R., Hanks, C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R., …, Barnard, K. (1997). Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 644–652.
10. Korfmacher, J., O’Brien, R., Hiatt, S., & Olds, D. L. (1999). Differences in program implementation between nurses and paraprofessionals providing home visits during pregnancy and infancy: A randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health,89(12), 1847–1851.
11. Lee, S., Aos, S., Drake, E., Pennucci, A., Miller, M., & Anderson, L. (2012). Return on investment: Evidence-based options to improve statewide outcomes. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
12. Miller, T. R., & Levy, D. T. (2000). Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: Eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. Medical Care,38(6), 562–582.
13. Miller, T. R., Olds, D., Knudtson, M., Luckey, D., Bondy, J., & Stevenson, A. (2010). Return on investment: Nurse and paraprofessional home visitation. (Grant Number: 2005-MU-MU-0001). U.S. Department of Justice. Denver: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.
14. NFP National Services Office. (2013). Quarterly report for national nfp: Data through 31 Dec 2012. Denver: Nurse-Family Partnership National Services Office.
15. O’Brien, R. A., Moritz, P., Luckey, D. W., McClatchey, M. W., Ingoldsby, E. M., & Olds, D. L. (2012). Mixed methods analysis of participant attrition in the nurse-family partnership. Prevention Science,13(3), 219–228.
16. Olds, D., Donelan-McCall, N., O’Brien, R., MacMillan, H., Jack, S., Jenkins, T., & Beeber, L. (2013). Improving the nurse-family partnership in community practice. Pediatrics,132(Suppl 2), S110–S117.
17. Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Kitzman, H., Powers, J., Cole, R., & Luckey, D. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Journal of the American Medical Association,278(8), 637–643.
18. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R, Jr, Phelps, C., Kitzman, H., & Hanks, C. (1993). Effect of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on government spending. Medical Care,31(2), 155–174.
19. Suter, C. R. (2010). Economic evaluation of a community-based, family skills prevention program (M.A. Thesis), Washington State University. Retrieved from http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Spring2010/c_suter_042010.pdf
20. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Occupation employment statistics (oes data—state).
21. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Employment cost index—historical listing, volumes i and iii. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/ect/#tables