Correction: Ecosystem engineering by plants on wave-exposed intertidal flats is governed by relationships between effect and response traits (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:9 (e0138086) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138086);Ecosystem engineering by plants on wave-exposed intertidal flats is governed by relationships between effect and response traits

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Heuner, Maike ^a,b   Silinski, Alexandra ^c   Schoelynck, Jonas ^c   Bouma, Tjeerd J ^d   Puijalon, Sara ^e   Troch, Peter ^f   Fuchs, Elmar ^a   Schröder, Boris ^g,h   Schröder, Uwe ^a   Meire, Patrick ^c   Temmerman, Stijn ^c  

^a FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY   (Germany)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d ROYAL NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR SEA RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^g TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^h BERLIN BRANDENBURG INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH BBIB   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; LIGNIN; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOLOGICAL TRAIT; BIOMASS; BIOMECHANICS; BOLBOSCHOENUS MARITIMUS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FORCE; INTERTIDAL ZONE; NONHUMAN; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT STEM; PLANT STRESS; PLANT STRUCTURES; PREDICTION; SCIRPUS; SCIRPUS TABERNAEMONTANI; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CYPERACEAE; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; TSUNAMI;

CELLULOSE; CYPERACEAE; ECOSYSTEM; PLANT STEMS; TIDAL WAVES;

EID: 84947484159     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171364     Document Type: Erratum

References (54)

1. Hastings A, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Cuddington K, Jones CG, Lambrinos JG, et al. Ecosystem engineering in space and time. Ecology Letters. 2007; 10(2):153-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00997.x WOS:000243754000007. PMID: 17257103
2. Boogert NJ, Paterson DM, Laland KN. The implications of niche construction and ecosystem engineering for conservation biology. BioScience. 2006; 56(7):570-8.
3. Crooks JA. Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 2002; 97(2):153-66. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970201.x WOS:000176678800001.
4. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003; 18(3):119-25. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00045-9
5. Cuddington K, Wilson WG, Hastings A. Ecosystem engineers: Feedback and population dynamics. American Naturalist. 2009; 173(4):488-98. doi: 10.1086/597216 WOS:000263937300009. PMID: 19239352
6. Gilad E, von Hardenberg J, Provenzale A, Shachak M, Meron E. Ecosystem engineers: From pattern formation to habitat creation. Phys Rev Lett. 2004; 93(9):4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.098105 WOS:000223555600070.
7. Wright JP, Jones CG. The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: Progress, limitations, and challenges. Bioscience. 2006; 56(3):203-9. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0203: tcooae]2.0.co;2 WOS:000236096800007.
8. Traill LW, Lim MLM, Sodhi NS, Bradshaw CJA. Mechanisms driving change: altered species interactions and ecosystem function through global warming. J Anim Ecol. 2010; 79(5):937-47. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2656.2010.01695.x WOS:000280671000002. PMID: 20487086
9. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters. 2005; 8(5):468-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x WOS:000228397000002. PMID: 21352450
10. Benayas JMR, Newton AC, Diaz A, Bullock JM. Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis. Science. 2009; 325(5944):1121-4. doi: 10.1126/science. 1172460 WOS:000269382300039. PMID: 19644076
11. Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2011; 26(10):541-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011 WOS:000295745400013.
12. Van Wesenbeeck BK, van de Koppel J, Herman PMJ, Bouma TJ. Does scale-dependent feedback explain spatial complexity in salt-marsh ecosystems? Oikos. 2008; 117(1):152-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2007. 0030-1299.16245.x WOS:000251387000018.
13. Vandenbruwaene W, Temmerman S, Bouma TJ, Klaassen PC, de Vries MB, Callaghan DP, et al. Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: Implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface. 2011; 116:13. F01008 doi: 10.1029/2010jf001788 WOS:000287520200001.
14. Anderson ME, Smith JM. Wave attenuation by flexible, idealized salt marsh vegetation. Coastal Engineering. 2014; 83(0):82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.10.004
15. Knutson PL, Brochu A, Seelig WN, Inskeep M. Wave damping in Spartina alterniflora marshes. Virginia: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center Fort Belvoir, 1982.
16. Möller I. Quantifying saltmarsh vegetation and its effect on wave height dissipation: Results from a UK East coast saltmarsh. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 2006; 69(3-4):337-51. doi: 10.1016/j. ecss.2006.05.003 WOS:000240947300004.
17. Paul M, Bouma TJ, Amos CL. Wave attenuation by submerged vegetation: combining the effect of organism traits and tidal current. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2012; 444:31-41. doi: 10.3354/meps09489 WOS:000298970900003.
18. Bouma TJ, De Vries MB, Low E, Peralta G, Tanczos C, Van de Koppel J, et al. Trade-offs related to ecosystem engineering: A case study on stiffness of emerging macrophytes. Ecology. 2005; 86 (8):2187-99. ISI:000231075400026.
19. Ysebaert T, Yang SL, Zhang LQ, He Q, Bouma TJ, Herman PMJ. Wave attenuation by two contrasting ecosystem engineering salt marsh macrophytes in the intertidal pioneer zone. Wetlands. 2011; 31 (6):1043-54. doi: 10.1007/s13157-011-0240-1 WOS:000297864900005.
20. Bouma TJ, De Vries MB, Herman PMJ. Comparing ecosystem engineering efficiency of two plant species with contrasting growth strategies. Ecology. 2010; 91(9):2696-704. doi: 10.1890/09-0690.1 WOS:000281698400025. PMID: 20957963
21. He Q, Bertness MD. Extreme stresses, niches, and positive species interactions along stress gradients. Ecology. 2014; 95(6):1437-43. doi: 10.1890/13-2226.1 PMID: 25039207
22. Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology. 2002; 16(5):545-56. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x WOS:000178119300001.
23. Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos. 2007; 116(5):882-92. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.x WOS:000245814500017.
24. Diaz S, Cabido M. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2001; 16(11):646-55. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02283-2 WOS:000171714800016.
25. Crain CM, Bertness ND. Community impacts of a tussock sedge: Is ecosystem engineering important in benign habitats? Ecology. 2005; 86(10):2695-704. doi: 10.1890/04-1517 WOS:000232361800015.
26. Henry PY, Myrhaug D. Wave-induced drag force on vegetation under shoaling random waves. Coastal Engineering. 2013; 78:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.03.004 WOS:000319852900002.
27. Denny MW. Extreme drag forces and the survival of wind and water-swept organisms. The Journal of Experimental Botany. 1994; 194:97-115.
28. Pollen-Bankhead N, Thomas RE, Gurnell AM, Liffen T, Simon A, O'Hare MT. Quantifying the potential for flow to remove the emergent aquatic macrophyte Sparganium erectum from the margins of lowenergy rivers. Ecological Engineering. 2011; 37(11):1779-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.027 WOS:000295303500021.
29. Bouma TJ, Friedrichs M, Klaassen P, van Wesenbeeck BK, Brun FG, Temmerman S, et al. Effects of shoot stiffness, shoot size and current velocity on scouring sediment from around seedlings and propagules. Marine Ecology-Progress Series. 2009; 388:293-7. doi: 10.3354/meps08130 ISI:000269892700024.
30. Friess DA, Krauss KW, Horstman EM, Balke T, Bouma TJ, Galli D, et al. Are all intertidal wetlands naturally created equal? Bottlenecks, thresholds and knowledge gaps to mangrove and saltmarsh ecosystems. Biological Reviews. 2011; 87(2):346-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00198.x WOS:000302351300006. PMID: 21923637
31. Taylor GE. Plant and leaf resistance to gaseous air pollution stress. New Phytologist. 1978; 80(3):523-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01584.x
32. Levitt J. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. New York: Academic Press; 1972. 697 p.
33. Puijalon S, Bouma TJ, Douady CJ, van Groenendael J, Anten NPR, Martel E, et al. Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance-tolerance trade-off. New Phytologist. 2011; 191(4):1141-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03763.x WOS:000293792400021. PMID: 21585390
34. Schoelynck J, Meire D, Bal K, Buis K, Troch P, Bouma T, et al. Submerged macrophytes avoiding a negative feedback in reaction to hydrodynamic stress Limnologica. 2013; 43(5):371-80.
35. Asaeda T, Fujino T, Manatunge J. Morphological adaptations of emergent plants to water flow: a case study with Typha angustifolia, Zizania latifolia and Phragmites australis. Freshwater Biology. 2005; 50 (12):1991-2001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01445.x WOS:000233290000007.
36. Schoelynck J, Bal K, Baclx H, Okruszko T, Meire P, Struyf E. Silica uptake in aquatic and wetland macrophytes: a strategic choice between silica, lignin and cellulose? New Phytologist. 2010; 186:385-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03176.x PMID: 20136720
37. McLaughlin EC, Tait RA. Fracture mechanism of plant fibres. J Mater Sci. 1980; 15(1):89-95. doi: 10.1007/BF00552431
38. Zhang C-B, Chen L-H, Jiang J. Why fine tree roots are stronger than thicker roots: The role of cellulose and lignin in relation to slope stability. Geomorphology. 2014; 206(0):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j. geomorph.2013.09.024
39. Fittschen T. Wellenmessungen an der Unterelbe. Schiffswellenmessungen im Auftrag des Wasserund Schifffahrtsamts Hamburg. Report. Available: http://www.kuestendaten.de/publikationen/index.html?Suchtext=&Elbe = on. 2003.
40. Silinski A, Heuner M, Schoelynck J, Puijalon S, Schröder U, Fuchs E, et al. Effects of wind waves versus ship waves on tidal marsh plants: a flume study on different life stages of Scirpus maritimus. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(3):e0118687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118687 PMID: 25799017
41. Van Soest PJ. Use of detergents in analysis of fibrous feeds II. A rapid method for determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1963; 46(5):829-35.
42. Jung HJG, Varel VH, Weimer PJ, Ralph J. Accuracy of Klason lignin and acid detergent lignin methods as assessed by bomb calorimetry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1999; 47(5):2005-8. doi: 10.1021/jf981250q WOS:000080427200035. PMID: 10552486
43. Pages JF, Farina S, Gera A, Arthur R, Romero J, Alcoverro T. Indirect interactions in seagrasses: fish herbivores increase predation risk to sea urchins by modifying plant traits. Functional Ecology. 2012; 26(5):1015-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02038.x WOS:000309391500004.
44. Koivisto M, Westerbom M, Riihimaki A. Succession-driven facilitation of macrofaunal communities in sublittoral blue mussel habitats. Marine Biology. 2011; 158(5):945-54. doi: 10.1007/s00227-010-1621-3 WOS:000289691900001.
45. Usherwood JR, Ennos AR, Ball DJ. Mechanical and anatomical adaptations in terrestrial and aquatic buttercups to their respective environments. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1997; 48(7):1469-75. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.7.1469
46. Nepf HM. Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research. 1999; 35(2):479-89. doi: 10.1029/1998WR900069
47. Vieira DAN, Dabney SM. Two-dimensional flow patterns near contour grass hedges. Hydrological Processes. 2012; 26(15):2225-34. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8262 WOS:000306477100003.
48. Balke T, Webb EL, van den Elzen E, Galli D, Herman PMJ, Bouma TJ. Seedling establishment in a dynamic sedimentary environment: a conceptual framework using mangroves. J Appl Ecol. 2013; 50 (3):740-7. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12067 WOS:000319350800021. PMID: 23894211
49. Möller I, Spencer T, French JR, Leggett DJ, Dixon M. Wave transformation over salt marshes: A field and numerical modelling study from north Norfolk, England. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 1999; 49(3):411-26. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1999.0509 WOS:000082792400007.
50. Kaufman PB, Cseke LJ, Warber S. Natural products from plants. Boca Raton [etc.]: CRC Press; 1999. 343 p.
51. Temmerman S, Bouma TJ, Van de Koppel J, Van der Val D, De Vries MB, Herman PMJ. Vegetation causes channel erosion in a tidal landscape. The Geological Society of America. 2007; 35(7):631-4.
52. Bertness MD. Atlantic shorelines: Natural history and ecology. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press; 2006. 464 p.
53. Bertness MD, Leonard GH. The role of positive interactions in communities: Lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology. 1997; 78(7):1976-89. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1976:tropii]2.0.co;2 WOS: A1997XZ78900005.
54. Temmerman S, Meire P, Bouma TJ, Herman PMJ, Ysebaert T, De Vriend HJ. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature. 2013; 504(7478):79-83. doi: 10.1038/nature12859 PMID: 24305151