Drawing: The enactive evolution of the practitioner

Drawing: The Enactive Evolution of the Practitioner

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-297

  Cain, PatriciA ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947435242     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (394)

1. Abbs, P. (1989), The Symbolic Order: A Contemporary Reader On The Arts Debate, Falmer Press.
2. Aimes-Lewis, F. (2000), Drawing in early Renaissance Italy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Alloway, L. (1984), ‘Network: The Art World Described as a System’, in Artforum: Network art and complex present, UMI Research Publishing.
4. Amabile, T. M. (1983), The Social Psychology of Creativity, New York, NY: SpringerVerlag.
5. Arnaud, Reid, L. (1980), ‘Art: Knowledge That and Knowing This’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 20, p. 330.
6. Arnheim, R. (1956), Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye, London: Faber and Faber.
7. Arnheim, R. (1981), ‘The State of the Art: An introduction’, Review of Research in Visual Arts Education, 14, pp. 1–3.
8. Ascott, R. (1990), ‘Is There Love in the Telematic Embrace?’, Art Journal, New York: College Arts Association of America, 49: 3, pp. 241–7.
9. Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (2000), The intuitive practitioner: on the value of not always knowing what one is doing, Bristol: Open University Press.
10. Audi, Robert (ed.) (1999), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bailey, G.H. (1982), ‘Drawing and the Drawing Activity: A Phenomenological Investigation’, Ph.D. thesis, London Institute of Education.
12. Bambach, C. (1999), Drawing and painting in the Italian Renaissance workshop: theory and practice, 1300–1600, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Barfield, N. and Quinn, M. (2004), ‘Research as a mode of construction; engaging with the artefact in art and design research’, Working Papers in Art and Design. http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol3/nbfull.html. Accessed 21st September 2007.
14. Barnett, R. (1994), The Limits of Competence, Knowledge, Higher Education and Society, Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
15. Barron, F. (1988), ‘Putting creativity to work’, in R.J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Bateson, G. (1973), Mind and Nature: Steps to an Ecology of mind, Paladin Books.
17. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. and Damasio, A. R. (1997), ‘Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy’, Science, 275: 5304, pp. 1293–1295.
18. Becker, H. (1967), ‘Whose Side Are We On?’, Social Problems, 14, pp. 239–247.
19. Benjamin, W. (1969), Illuminations, New York: Schoken Book.
20. Bermúdez, J. L. (2003), Thinking without words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Berry, D. C. and Broadbent, D. E. (1995), ‘Implicit learning in the control of complex systems: A reconsideration of some of the earlier claims’, in P.A Frensch and J. Funke (eds.), Complex problem solving: The European Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 131–150.
22. Berry, D.C. and Dienes, Z. (1993), Implicit learning: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Bertalanffy, L. Von. (1950), ‘An Outline of General Systems Theory’, Philosophy of Science, 1: 2.
24. Best, D. (1985), Feeling and Reason in the Arts, London: George Allan and Unwin.
25. Beuys, J. (1990), ‘From a competitive to a Compassionate Society’, in L. Wijers (ed.), Art meets Science and Spirituality, Art and Design, Academy Editions.
26. Bird, E. (2000), ‘Research in Art and Design: the first decade’, Working Papers in Art and Design, 1, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol1/bird2full.html. Accessed 21 September 2007.
27. Blunsden, P. (1998), ‘Research into Practice’, Point: Art and Design Research Journal, 5, Spring/Summer, p. 20.
28. Boden, M. A. (1990), The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
29. Bogdan, R. and Taylor, S.J. (1975), Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences, London: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Bolt, B. (2004), Art Beyond Representation: The Performative Power of the Image, London: I.B. Taurus.
31. Bolt, B. (2006), ‘Materializing Pedagogies’, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol4/bbfull.html. Accessed 21 September 2007.
32. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985), ‘Promoting Reflection in Learning; a model’, in D. Boud, R. Keogh and D. Walker (eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, London: Kogan Page.
33. Bourgoine, F. and Varela, F. (1992), ‘Towards a practice of autonomy’, in P. Bourgine and F.J. Varela (eds.), Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
34. Brennan, T. and Walsh, J. (2005), ‘Douglas Harding and ‘Headlessness’ Implications for Psychology’, Transpersonal Psychology Review, 9: 1, pp. 80–93.
35. Broadbent, D. (1977), ‘The hidden preattentive processes’, American Psychologist, 32, pp. 109–118.
36. Brockman, J. (1995), The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
37. Brown, R., Aleksander, I., Mackenzie, J. and Faith, J. (2001), Biotica: Art Emergence and Artificial Life, RCA CRD Research Publications.
38. Bruner, J. (1990), Acts of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Bruns, G. (1994), Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern, Albany, NY: Yale University Press.
40. Burgess, R.G. (1981), ‘Keeping a research diary’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 11: 1, pp. 75–83
41. Buzan, T. and Buzan, B. (1994), The Mind Map Book, London: E P Dutton.
42. Cameron, Dan (2003), Living Inside the Grid, New York, NY: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
43. Campbell, D.T. (1960), ‘Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes’, Psychological Review, 67, pp. 380–400.
44. Candy, P., Harri-Augstein, S., and Thomas, L. (1985), ‘Reflection and the Self-Organised Learner; A model of Learning Conversations’, in D. Boud, R. Keogh and D. Walker (eds.), Reflection: ‘Turning Experience into Learning’, London: Kogan Page.
45. Capra, F. (1996), The web of life: a new synthesis of mind and matter, London: Flamingo.
46. Carlisle, B. (1989), ‘The Fourth Good; Observations on Art Education in China’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 23: 1, Arts Education in China (Spring 1989), pp. 17–39.
47. Carnie, Andrew (2002), ‘Scientists and artists must rub shoulders’, The Observer, 17 March 2002.
48. Cennini, Cennino d’Andrea (1954), The Craftsman’s Handbook – “Il libro dell Arte”, New York: Dover Publications.
49. Chalmers, D. (1995), ‘Facing up to the problem of Consciousness’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2: 3, pp. 200–219.
50. Chalmers, D.J. (1999), ‘First Person Methods in the Science of Consciousness’, Arizona Consciousness Bulletin, 1999. [Also at http://consc.net/papers/firstperson.html. Accessed on 25 May 2007].
51. Chalmers, David J. (2004), ‘How can we construct a science of consciousness?’, in The Cognitive Neurosciences III, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. [Also at http://consc.net/papers/scicon.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2007].
52. Clark, A. (1997), Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
53. Clark, A. (1998), ‘Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition’, in W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds.), A companion to cognitive sciences, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc. pp. 506–517.
54. Claxton, G.L. (2004), ‘The Anatomy of Intuition’, in T. Atkinson and G.L Claxton (eds.), The Intuitive Practitioner, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
55. Claxton, G. L. (1997), Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind – Why Intelligence increases when you think less, London: Fourth Estate.
56. Coessens, K., Crispin, D. and Douglas, A. (2009), The Artistic Turn, Leuven: University of Leuven Press.
57. Collins, Cecil, (1994), The Vision of the Fool and Other Writings, Golgonooza Press
58. Collins, G. R. (1979), Visionary Drawing of Architecture and Planning: 20th Century through the 60’s, Cambridge: MIT Press
59. Collins, M.A. and Amabile, T.M. (2003), ‘Motivation and Creativity’, in R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–312.
60. Corner, J. (1992), ‘Representation and landscape, drawing and making in the landscape medium’, Word and Image, 8: 3, July/September, pp. 243–275.
61. Cornock, S. (1986), ‘Forms of Knowing in the Study of the Arts’, in D.F. Marks, J.T.E Richardson and D.G Russell (eds.), Imagery 2: Proceedings of the Second Imagery Conference, Human Performance Associates, pp. 202–207.
62. Couclelis, H. and Gale, N. (1996), ‘Space and Spaces’ in Geografiska Annaler, Vol 68, 68B pp. 1–12.
63. Coulson, M. (1996), The Cognitive Function of Confusion, Paper presented to the British Psychological Society Conference, London, December 1996.
64. Craig-Martin, M. (1995), Drawing the Line: Re-appraising drawing past and present, South Bank Centre.
65. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003), ‘Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity’, in R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–330.
66. Cullen, G. (1961), Townscape, London: The Architectural Press.
67. Damasio, A. R. (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion Reason and the Human Brain, New York: Putnam.
68. Davey, J. R. Nicholas (1999), ‘Writing and the in-between’, Point 7, Spring/Summer, pp. 12–18.
69. Davies, T. (2002), ‘Drawing on the Past: Reflecting on the Future’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21: 3, pp. 284–291.
70. De Freitas, N. (2002), ‘Towards a definition of studio documentation: working tool and transparent record’, Working Papers in Art and Design, 2, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol2/freitasfull.html. Accessed 13 March 2005.
71. De Magalhães, R. M. (1999), ‘The Organizational Implementation of Information Systems; Towards a new theory’, Ph.D. thesis, The London School of Economics.
72. De Zegher, C. (2003), The Stage of Drawing: Gesture and Act, New York: Tate Publishing and The Drawing Center.
73. De Zegher, C. and Wigley, D. (2001), The Activist Drawing: Retracing Situationist Architectures, Constants New Babylon and Beyond, New York: The Drawing Center.
74. Dennet, D. (1978), ‘Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness’, in Brainstorms, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press and Bradford Books.
75. Dennett, D. C. (1991), Consciousness Explained, London: The Penguin Press
76. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2003), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, Sage.
77. Depraz, N, Varela, F. and Vermersch, P. (2003), On becoming Aware – Steps to Phenomenological Pragmatics, Advances in Consciousness Research, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamin Publishing.
78. Dewey, J. (1933), How do we think? Boston, MA: D C Heath and Co.
79. Dewey, J. (1934), Art as Experience, New York, NY: Capricorn Books.
80. Diaz de Chumacerio, C.L. (1999), ‘Seredipity’, in M. Runco and S. Pritziker (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Creativity, 2, San Diego and London: Academic Press, pp. 543–549.
81. Dodson, Bert (1990), Keys to Drawing, North Light Books.
82. Douglas, A. (1992), ‘Structure and Improvisation: The Making Aspects of Sculpture’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Sunderland.
83. Douglas, A., K. Scopa & C. Gray (2000), ‘Research through practice: positioning the practitioner as researcher’, Working Papers in Art and Design, 1, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol1/douglas2.html. Accessed 8 October 2007.
84. Doyle, M., MacFarlane, K. and Stout, K. (eds.) (2002), Drawing on Space, London: The Drawing Room.
85. Dubury, F. and Willats, J. (1972), Drawing Systems, London: Studio Vista.
86. Duncum, Paul (1985), ‘How 35 Children Born between 1724 and 1900 Learned to Draw Studies’, Art Education, 26: 2, pp. 93–102.
87. Duncum, Paul (1988), ‘To Copy or Not to Copy: A Review’, Studies in Art Education, 29: 4, pp. 203–210.
88. Eames, A. (2000), ‘From Drawing to Computing and Back Again’, Paper from the Drawing Across Boundaries Conference, Published on the Tracey Website, http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ac/tracey/dab/eames.html. Accessed 8 October 2007.
89. Edelman, G. M. (1991), ‘Antibody structure and molecular immunology’, Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 34, pp. 1–22.
90. Edmonds, Ernest A. and Candy, Linda (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition, Loughborough, United Kingdom, October 11–13 1999.
91. Edwards, B. (1981), Drawing on the right side of the brain, London: Souvenir Press.
92. Edwards, B. (1987), Drawing on the Artist Within: how to release your hidden creativity, London: William Collins.
93. Eilen, N., McCarthy, R. and Brewer, W. (eds.) (1999), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press
94. Eisner, E. W. (1972), Educating Artist Vision, New York NY: Macmillan.
95. Eisner, E. W. (1993), ‘Forms of Understanding and the Future of Educational Research’, Educational Researcher, 22: 7, October 1993, pp. 5–11.
96. Elderfield, J. (1983), Some paragraphs on Modern Drawing, Cleveland Drawing Biennale.
97. Elderfield, J. (1983), The Modern Drawing: 100 works on Paper from the Museum of Modern Art, London: Thames and Hudson.
98. Elkins, J. (1993), ‘From Original to Copy and back again’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 33: 2, pp. 113–120.
99. Elkins, J. (2001), Why Art cannot be taught: a handbook for art students, University of Illinois Press.
100. Emery, F.E. (ed.) (1969), Systems thinking: Selected readings, Harmondsworth: Penguin Modern Management Readings.
101. Emig, J. (1977), ‘Writing as a Model of Learning’, College Composition and Communication, 28, pp. 122–28.
102. English, Leona M. and Gillen, Marie A. (eds.) (2000), Addressing the spiritual dimensions of adult learning: what educators can do, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
103. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V. and Heier, H. (1996), ‘Individual Differences in Intuitive-Experiential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 2, pp. 390–405.
104. Evans, N. (1994), Experiential learning for all, London: Cassell.
105. Evan, R. (1995), The Projective Cast: Architecture and its Three Geometries, The MIT Press.
106. Farthing, S. (2006), Turner Exhibition, http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/exhibitions/drawingfromturner. Accessed 7 October 2007.
107. Fernyhough, C. (2005), ‘What’s on your mind?’, The Guardian, 15 October 2005.
108. Feyerabend, P. K. (1978), Against Method, Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, London: Verso.
109. Finke, R. A. (1996), ‘Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure’, Consciousness and Cognition, 5: 3, pp. 381–393.
110. Finke, R., Ward, T. and Smith, S. (1992), Creative Cognition: Theory, Research and Applications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
111. Fish, J. (1996), ‘How Sketches Work: A cognitive Theory for Improved System Design’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Loughborough.
112. Flint, J. (2006), ‘How to cure a bad case of chance’, in J. Walwin and H. Krokatsis, Drawing and Random Interference, London: Hayward Gallery.
113. Flint-Sato, C. (1999), Japanese Calligraphy: The Art of Line and Space, Art Books Intl Ltd.
114. Flint-Sato, C. (2006), E-mail to Patricia Cain, 28 July 2006.
115. Franck, F. (1973), Zen of Seeing: Seeing/Drawing as Meditation, Vintage.
116. Franck, F. (1993), Zen Seeing, Zen Drawing: Meditation in Action, New York, NY: Bantam.
117. Franz, Jason (2006), E-mail to Patricia Cain, 06 July 2006.
118. Frayling, C. (1993/4), Research in Art and Design, Royal College of Art Research Papers,1: 1.
119. Frazer, I. and Hemni, R. (1994), Envisioning Architecture: An analysis of Drawing, New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
120. French, R. M. and Cleeremans, A. (2002), Notes from Implicit leaning and consciousness: An Empirical philosophical and computational consensus in the making, Hove: Psychological Press.
121. Frith, C. and Law, J. (1993), ‘Cognitive and Psychological Processes Underlying Drawing Skills’, Leonardo, 28: 3, pp. 203–206.
122. Galbraith, D. (1992), ‘Conditions for Discovery through writing’, Instructional Science, 21: 1–3, pp. 45–71.
123. Galbraith, D. (1996), ‘Self-monitoring, discovery through writing and individual differences in drafting strategy’, in G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Burgh and M. Couzjin (eds.), Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research, Amsterdam; Amsterdam University Press, pp. 121–141.
124. Galbraith, D. (1999), ‘Writing as a knowledge-constituting process’, in M. Torrance and D. Galbraith (eds.), Knowing What to Write: Conceptual Processes in Text Production, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 139–160.
125. Galbraith, D. (2006b), E-mail to Patricia Cain, 28 January 2006
126. Galbraith, D., Torrance, M. and Hallam, J. (2006), Effects on Writing on conceptual Coherence, Paper given at 10th International SIG Conference on the ERLI special interest group on writing in September 2006: University of Antwerp.
127. Gallagher, S. and Shear, J. (eds.) (2000), Models of the Self, Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
128. Gardner, H. (1980), Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings, New York, NY: Basic Books.
129. Gardner, H. (1982), Art, mind, and brain: a cognitive approach to creativity, New York, NY: Basic Books.
130. Gardner, H. and Winner, E. (1982) First intimations of artistry in Strauss, S. (ed) U-shaped behavioural growth. New York: Academic Press.
131. Gardner, H. (1993), Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences, London: Fontana.
132. Gardner, H. (1994), Creating Minds, New York, NY: Basic Books.
133. Gardner, H. and Winner, E. (1995), First intimations of Avlistry in Strauss, S (Ed) ??????
134. Garner, S. (1992), ‘The Undervalued Role of Drawing in Design’, in David Thistlewood (ed.), Drawing Research and Development, London: Longmans, pp. 98–109.
135. Gedenryd, H. (1998), ‘How designers work: Making sense of authentic cognitive activities’, Ph.D. thesis, Lund University.
136. Getzels, J. W. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975), ‘From problem solving to problem finding’, in I.A. Taylor and J.W. Getzels (eds.), Perspectives in Creativity, Aldine Publishing Company, pp. 108–114.
137. Getzels, J. W. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976), The Creative Vision: A longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art, New York, NY: Wiley.
138. Ghaye, T. and Lillyman, S. (1997), Learning Journals and Critical Incidents; Reflective Practice for Health Care Professionals, Dinton: Quay Books.
139. Ghiselin, B. (ed.) (1952), The Creative Process: A Symposium, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
140. Gibbs, G. (1988), Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods, Birmingham: SCED.
141. Gibson, J. J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
142. Gill, R. W. (1974), Basic Perspective, London: Thames and Hudson.
143. Glanville, R. (1998), ‘Challenging the scientific paradigm for research and design: Keeping Faith with the Design in Design Research’, Designing Design Research 2, The Design Publication, De Montford University, Leicester: Cyberbridge-4D Design.
144. Gillham, B. (2000), The Research Interview, London and New York: Continuum Books.
145. Gilham, B. (2005), Research Interviewing – The range of Techniques, Open University Press.
146. Gillham, B. and McGilp, H. (2007), ‘Re-coding the Creative Process: An Empirical Basis for Practice Integrated Research in the Arts’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 26: 2, June 2007, pp. 177–184(8).
147. Godfrey, T. (1980), Drawing Today: Draftsman in the Eighties, Oxford: Phaidon.
148. Goleman, D. (1995), Emotional Intelligence, London: Bloomsbury.
149. Gombrich, E (1966), Norm and form: studies in the art of the Renaissance, London: Phaidon Press.
150. Goodfield, J. (1981), The Imagined world: A story of Scientific Study, New York: Harper and Rowe.
151. Grant, A. A., Langer, E. J., Falk, E. and Capodilupo, C. (2001), ‘Mindful Creativity; Drawing to Draw Distinctions’, Creativity Research Journal, 16: 2/3, pp. 261.
152. Gray, C. (1998), ‘Inquiry through Practice; Developing Appropriate research Strategies in Art and Design’, in Pekka Korvenmaa (ed.), No Guru, No Method? Discussions on Art and Design Research, Helsinki: Helsinki University of Art and Design, Helsinki.
153. Gray, C. (1996), ‘Developing a research procedures programme for artists and designers’, Aberdeen: Gray’s School of Art, http://graysnet.rgu.ac.uk?visualisingresearch/Publications/CraftCouncilconf.pdf. Accessed 5 October 2007.
154. Gray, C. and Malins, J. (2004), Visualising Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design, Aldershot: Ashgate.
155. Gray, C. and Pirie, I. (1995), ‘Artistic Research Procedure’, Research at the Edge of Chaos? Proceedings Design Interfaces Conference, Salford.
156. Green, A. (2003), ‘The Science and Philosophy of Consciousness’, http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~lka/conz.htm. Accessed 4 July 2006.
157. Greeno, J.G., Pearson, P. D. and Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999), ‘Achievement and Theories of Knowing and Learning’, in R. McCormack and C. Paechter (eds.), Learning and knowledge, London: Paul Chapman in association with the Open University.
158. Gregory, R. L. (ed.) (2004), The Oxford Companion to the Mind, Second Edition, Oxford University Press.
159. Gruber, Howard E. (1978), ‘Darwin’s “Tree of Nature” and other images of wide scope’, in Judith Wechsler (ed.), On Aesthetics in Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 121–140.
160. Gruber, H. (1981), ‘On the relation between “A-ha experiences” and the construction of Ideas’, History of Science, Vol. 19, pp.41–59.
161. Gruber, Howard, E. (1999), ‘Evolving Systems Approach’, in Mark Runco and Steven R. Prittzker (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Creativity, San Diego and London: Academic Press.
162. Guilford, J.P. (1950), ‘Creativity’, American Psychologist, 5, pp. 444–54.
163. Habermas, J. (1971), Knowledge and Human Interests, London: Heinemann.
164. Hadamard, J. (1945), An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
165. Hagaman, Sally (1990), ‘”Review of Teaching Drawing from Art” – B. Wilson Hurwitz, M. Wilson’, Studies in Art Education, Vol. 31: 3, pp. 189–191.
166. Halsall, F. (2004), ‘Art, Art History and Systems Theory’, Ph.D. thesis, Fine Arts Department, Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
167. Hanrahan, S. (1998), ‘The Possibility of dialogue; The relationship between “words” and “art-making” in Fine Art Research’, Drawing Fire: The Journal of the National Association for Fine Arts Education, 2: 2, pp. 29–31.
168. Harding, D. (2002), On Having No Head: Zen and the Rediscovery of the Obvious, Revised Edition, Inner Directions Foundation.
169. Hardt, S. (1992), ‘Physics, Naive’, in S. Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence, New York: John Willey and Sons, pp. 1147–1149.
170. Harrison, E. (1960), Self-expression through art, Toronto: W.J Cage.
171. Hays, P. (1978), ‘The Naïve Physics Manifesto’ in Michie, D. (ed) Expert Systems in the Microelectronic Age. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
172. Hayward, J. and Varela, F. (eds.) (1992), Gentle Bridges: Dialogues between the Cognitive Sciences and the Buddhist Tradition, Boston: Shambhala Publishers.
173. Helighen, F. (2006), ‘What is systems theory?’, in F. Heylighen, C. Joslyn and V. Turchin (eds.), PC Web Principia Cybernetica, Brussels.
174. Herivel, A. (1997), ‘A Voyage between Tide and Time: Creating Research in the Studio’, Canadian Review of Art Education: Research and Issues, 23: 2, pp. 55–73.
175. Herwitz, D. (1995), Making theory constructing art: on the authority of the avant-garde, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
176. Hill, E. (1966), The Language of Drawing, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
177. Hockney, D. (2001), Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters Studio, London: Thames and Hudson.
178. Hockey, J. (1998), ‘Writing and Making; problems encountered by practice-based research degree students’, Point 7, Spring/Summer, pp. 38–43.
179. Holmes, J. (2005), ‘Re: definition: erasing as drawing’, E-mail posted to the Drawing Research Network on 12 November 2005, http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind05&L=drawing-research&T=0&O=A&X=5335607E31636868A3&Y=cainpi%40aol.com&P=39765. Accessed 17 June 2005.
180. Holton, G. (1978), The Scientific Imagination; Case Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
181. Hunt, I. (2001), ’From Mental Freedom: Ansuja Bloms House of the Invertebrates Series’, in Angela Kingston (ed.), The Centre for Drawing; The First Year, Wimbledon School of Art.
182. Hurley, S. (2003), ‘Animal Actions in the Space of Reasons’, Mind and Language, 18: 3, pp. 231–257.
183. Ingold, T. (2007), Lines: A Brief History, London: Routledge.
184. Isaksen, S.G. and Trefflinger, D.J. (1985), Creative Problem Solving: The Basic Course, Buffalo NY: Bearly Publishing.
185. Itten, J. (2006) in C. Harrison and P. Wood, Art in Theory 1900–1990: An Anthology of Changing Ideas, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
186. Jackendoff, R. (1987), Consciousness and the Computational Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
187. Janesick, V.J.(1999), ‘A Journal about Journal Writing’, Qualitative Inquiry, December 1999, pp. 505–524.
188. Janesick, V. J.(2001), ‘Intuition and Creativity; A pas de Deux for Qualitative Researchers’, Qualitative Inquiry, 7: 5, pp. 531–540.
189. Johnson, S. (2001), The connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software, London: Allan Lane.
190. John-Steiner, V. (1995), ‘Cognitive Pluralism: A Socio-cultural Approach in Mind Culture and Activity’, An International Journal, 2, Winter 1995, pp. 3–11.
191. John-Steiner, V. (1997), Notebooks of the Mind: Explorations of thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
192. Jones, R. D. (2004), ‘The Illustration of Experience’, Ph.D. thesis, Plymouth: Plymouth University.
193. Jonston, B. (2002), ‘Sketching Now’, The International Journal of Art and Design, 21: 3, pp. 246–253.
194. Joue, G. (2004), ‘Speech as Embodied Cognition’, Ph.D. thesis, Dublin: Department of Computer Science, University College Dublin.
195. Juarrero, A. (1999), Dynamics in action: intentional behaviour as a complex system, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT.
196. Kandinsky, W. (1979), Point and Line to Plane, New York NY: Dover Publications.
197. Kavakli, M., Scrivener, S. and Ball, L.J. (1998), ’Structure in idea sketching behaviour’, Design Studies, 19: 4, pp. 485–517.
198. Kay, S. (1991), ‘Comparing the figural problem-solving and problem-finding of professional semiprofessional and non-artists’, Creativity Research Journal, 4: 3, pp. 223–252.
199. Keane, J. (2006), ‘Arakawa and Gins: The Æffective Practice of Embodied Cognition’, Ph.D. thesis, Griffith University.
200. Kellogg, R. (1969), Analysing Children’s Art, Palo Alto, CA: National Press.
201. Kemp, M. (1992), The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Sueurat, Newhaven and London: Yale University Press.
202. Kepes, G. (1944), The Language of Vision, Chicago, IL: Paul Theobold.
203. King, M. (1999), ‘The New Metaphysics and the Deep Structure of Creativity and Cognition’, in E.A. Edmonds and L. Candy (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity & Cognition, Loughborough, United Kingdom, October 11–13, pp. 93–100.
204. King, P. M. and Kitchener, K. S. (1994), Developing reflective judgement, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
205. Kingston, A. (ed.) (2001), The Centre for Drawing: The First Year, Wimbledon School of Art.
206. Kingston, A. (2003), What is Drawing?, London: Black Dog Publishing.
207. Kirton, M. J. (1989), Adaptors and Innovators; Styles of Creativity and Problem-Solving, Routledge.
208. Klee, P. (1961), The Thinking Eye: Notebooks Vol. 1, London: Lund Humphries.
209. Kolb, D. A. (1984), Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
210. Kozlowski, P. J. & Yakel, N. C. (1980), ‘Copying …The Direct Line to Creativity’, Art Education, 33: 8, pp. 24–27.
211. Krygier, J. B. (1991), ‘Cartography as an Art and Science?’, Cartographic Journal, 32: 6, pp. 3–10.
212. Lakoff and Johnston (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, Harper Collins Publishers.
213. Lamme, L. L. and Thompson, S. (1994), ‘“Copy? Real Artists Don’t Copy!” but maybe children should’, Art Education, 47: 6, pp. 46–51.
214. Lansing, K. M. (1976), Art, Artists and Art Education, Kendal: Hunt Publishing Co.
215. Lee, Sun-Young, and Barrett, T. (1991), ‘The Critical Writings of Lawrence Alloway’, Studies in Art Education, 32: 3, Spring 1991, pp. 171–177.
216. Leeds, J. A. (1984), ‘Copying and Invention as Sources of Form in Art’, Art Education, 37: 2, pp. 41–44/46.
217. Leedy, P. D. & Ormrod, J.E. (2001), Practical research: planning and design, Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill Prentice Hall.
218. Lewicki, P., Hill, T. and Czyzewska, M. (1992), ‘Non-conscious acquisition of information’, American Psychologist, 47, pp.796–801.
219. London, P. (1992), ‘Art as Transformation’, Art Education, 45: 3, May, pp. 8–15.
220. Lorimer, D. (ed.) (1999), The Spirit of Science: From Experiment to Experience, New York: Continuum.
221. Lowe, J. (1998), Drawing the Poetic into the law of the architect, Paper submitted for the ‘Drawing Across Boundaries; International Drawing Symposium’, School of Art and Design: Loughborough University.
222. Lowenfeld, V. (1954), Your child and His Art, New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.
223. Lowenfeld, V. and Brittain, W. l. (1987), Creative and Mental Growth, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
224. Lowry, K. and Wolf, C. (1988), ‘Arts Education in the Peoples Republic of China: Results of Interviews with Chinese Musicians and Visual Artists’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22: 1, pp. 89–98.
225. Lutz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: A first empirical case study’, Pheno Cogn Sci, 1: 2, pp. 133–167.
226. Lyons, L. (2006), ‘Walls are not my friends: issues surrounding the dissemination of practice-led research within appropriate and relevant contexts’, Working Papers in Art and Design, 4, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol4/llfull.html. Accessed 30 August 2009.
227. Maccoby, E. E. (1968), ’What copying requires’, Ontario Journal of Educational Research, 10: 3, pp. 163–170.
228. Mace, M. A. and Ward, T. (2002), ‘Modelling the Creative Process: A Grounded Theory of Analysis of Creativity in the Domain of Art Making’, Creativity Research Journal, 14: 2, pp. 179–192.
229. MacLeod, K. (1998), ‘Research in Fine Art: theory, judgement and discourse’, Drawing Fire: The Journal of the National Association for Fine Arts Education, 2: 2, pp. 33–37.
230. MacLeod, K. (1999), ‘New Knowledge/Art Knowledge: Post-graduate Research in Fine Art’, Drawing Fire: The Journal of the National Association for Fine Arts Education, 2: 3, pp. 35–40.
231. MacLeod, K. (1999), ‘The Relationship of making to writing’, Point 7, Spring/Summer, pp. 4–7
232. MacLeod, K. and Holdridge, L. (2002), ‘Theory/Practice: a relationship in the making’, European Journal of Arts Education, Vol III, issues 2 and 3, 2001.
233. MacLeod, K. and Holdridge, L. (2005), ‘The Enactment of Thinking: creative practice research degrees’, in K. Mey (ed.), The Journal of Visual Arts Practice, 3: 1 & 2.
234. MacLeod, K. and Holdridge, L. (eds.) (2006), Thinking Through Art: Reflections on art as research, London and New York: Routledge.
235. Mair, Miller (1980), ‘Feeling and Knowing’, in P. Salmon, Coming to know, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 113–127.
236. Maison, K. E. (1960), Themes and Variations, Norwich: Thames and Hudson.
237. Marton, F. and Booth, S. (1997), Learning and Awareness, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
238. Maturana, H. R. (1978), ‘Biology of Language: The Epistemology of Reality’, in G.A. Miller and E. Lenneberg (eds.), Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, New York: Academic Press, pp. 27–63.
239. Maturana, H. & Varela, F. J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living, Boston, MA: Reidel.
240. McCormack, R. (1999), ‘Practical Knowledge: A view form the Snooker Table’, in R. McCormack and C. Paechter (eds.), Learning and knowledge, London: Paul Chapman in association with the Open University.
241. McCormack, R. and Paechter, C. (1999), ‘Introduction: Learning and Knowledge construction’, in R. McCormack and C. Paechter (eds.), Learning and knowledge, London: Paul Chapman in association with the Open University.
242. McGee, K (2005), ‘Enactive Cognitive Science. Part One: Background and Research Themes’, Engineering Computer Scientific Survey, 1: 1, www.invie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/articles/1.1.mcgee.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2006.
243. McMahon, (2005), E-mail posted to the Drawing Research Network Discussion Group on 27 January, 2005, http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind05&L=drawingresearch&T=0&F=&S=&P=5546. Accessed 12 June 2006.
244. McNorton, J. (2002), ‘Choreography of Drawing: The Consciousness of the Body in the Space of a Drawing’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21: 3, pp. 254–257.
245. Medawar, P. (1996), ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud?’, in P. Medawar, The Strange Case of Spotted Mice and other classic essays on science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
246. Mey, K. (2005), Special edition of The Journal of Visual Arts Practice, 3: 142.
247. Mezirow J. and Associates (2000), Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
248. Milner M. [Joanna Field] (1971), On not being able to Paint, Los Angeles, CA: J.P. Tarcher, Inc.
249. Milner, M. (1986), A Life of One’s Own, London: Virago Press.
250. Milner, M. (1987), The Suppressed Madness of Sane Men: Forty four years of exploring psychoanalysis, London/New York: Tavistock Publications, Inc.
251. Mingers, J. (1989), ‘An introduction to Autopoiesis: Implications and Applications’, Systems Practice, 2: 2.
252. Mobley, M., Doares, L. and Mumford, M.D. (1992), ‘Process Analytic Models of Creative Capacities; Evidence for the Combination and Re-organisation Process’, Creativity Research Journal, 5, pp. 125–156.
253. Monte Grande (2004), Directed by Franz Reichle, Switzerland: t & c film.
254. Moon, J. A. (1999a), Learning Journals: A Handbook for Academics, Students and Professional Development, London. Kogan Page.
255. Moon, J. A. (1999b), Reflection in learning & professional development: theory & practice, London: Kogan Page.
256. Moon, J. A. (2004), A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice, Routledge Falmer.
257. Moore, K. (2003), ‘Between the lines: the role of drawing in design’, Loughborough University, http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ac/tracey/comm/moore.html. Accessed 8 October 2007.
258. Morgan, M. (1998), ‘Qualitative research: Science or Pseudo Science?’, The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Service, 10: 11, pp. 481–483.
259. Motherwell, R. (1997), Robert Motherwell on Paper: Drawings, Prints, Collages, New York, NY: Harry N Abrahams.
260. Museé du Louvre (1993), Copier Creér: De Turner á Picasso: 300 oeuvres insepareés par les maîtres du Louvre, Reunion des Musseés Nationaux.
261. Nagel T. (1974), ‘What is it like to be a bat?’, The Philosophical Review, 83: 4, October 1974, pp. 435–50.
262. Nakamura, F. (2006), ‘Issues of Authenticity and Originality in the Practice of “Copying”: Case of Contemporary Japanese Calligraphy’, http://www.yale.edu/macmillan/ceas/reproduction/reproduction_abstracts.html. Accessed 3 December 2007.
263. Newbury, Darren (2001), ‘Diaries and Fieldnotes in the Research Process’, Research Issues in Art and design media, 1: 1, Autumn, http://www.biad.uce.ac.uk/research/rti/riadm/issue1/abstract.htm. Accessed 3 December 2007.
264. Nolan, R. (1976), ‘The Character of Writings by Artists about Their Art’, Leonardo, 9, pp. 231–234.
265. Nørretranders, Tor (1999), The user illusion: cutting consciousness down to size, London: Penguin.
266. Noë, A. (2004), Action in perception, Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
267. Nussbaum, M. (2003) Upheavals of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
268. Nyrnes, A. (2004), Sensuous Knowledge, Conference Paper at Solstrand, Norway, 26–28 October, Bergen University College.
269. O’Callaghan, A.C. (2002), ‘The Creative Phenomena: the influence of Marion Milner on an understanding of the creative process and its potential’, M.Phil thesis, University of Kent.
270. Osborne, A. F. (1953), Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving, New York, NY: Schribners.
271. Overgaard, Morton, (2001), ‘The Role of Phenomenological Reports in Experiments on Consciousness’, Psycoloquy, 12: 29, Consciousness Report (1), http://psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/perl/search?year=20012001. Accessed 10 October 2006.
272. Pakes, A. (2004), ‘Art as action or art as object? The embodiment of knowledge in practice as research’, Working Papers in Art and Design 3, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdesign/research/papers/wpades/vol3/apfull.html. Accessed 29 may 2005.
273. Palmer, M. (2003), ‘Fw: Love at first sight’, Posting to the Drawing Research Network, PHD-DESIGN@ JISCMAIL.AC.UK, Accessed 15 January 2003.
274. Panofsky, E. (1991), Perspective as symbolic form, New York, NY: Zone Books.
275. Pask, G. (1975), Conversation, cognition and learning, New York: Elsevier.
276. Patterson, T. (2003), Conversation with Patricia Cain on 29 August 2003.
277. Perkins, D. N. (1977), ‘The Limits of Intuition’, Leonardo, 10, pp. 119–125.
278. Perkins, D. N. (1988), ‘Art as Understanding’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22: 1, Spring, p.122.
279. Perry, L. (1992), ‘Towards a definition of Drawing’, in D. Thistlewood (ed.), Drawing Research and Development, Harlow, UK: Longman in Association with the National Society for Art and Design Education.
280. Peshkin, A. (1988), ‘In search of subjectivity: one’s own’, Educational Researcher, 17: 7, pp. 17–21.
281. Petherbridge, D. (1991), The Primacy of Drawing: - An Artists View, London: South Bank Centre.
282. Petitmengin, Claire (1999), ‘The Intuitive Experience’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6: 2–3, pp. 43–77.
283. Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachond, B. and Roy, J-M. (eds.) (1999), Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
284. Pickering, J. (2000), ‘Methods are a Message’, in M. Velmans, Investigating Phenomenological Consciousness, New Methodologies and Maps (Advances in Consciousness Research Series), John Benjamins, pp. 279–302.
285. Poggenpohl, S. (2000), ‘Constructing Knowledge in Design, Part 2: Questions, An Approach to Design Research’, in David Durling et al. (eds.), Foundations for the Future, Doctoral Education in Design Proceedings, UK: Staffordshire University Press.
286. Poincaré, H. (1924), Mathematical Creation, Science Press, pp. 383–94.
287. Polyani, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
288. Polyani, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
289. Prosser, B. (2004), ‘An archetypal psychology of the ordinary; an investigation through drawing’, Ph.D. thesis, West of England University.
290. Purcell, A. T. and Gero J.S. (1998), ‘Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology’, Design Studies, 19: 4, pp. 389–430.
291. Ramos-Poqui, Ramos, and Rodway, David (1995), ‘Fine Art Research Methodology: The Meta Theoretical Level’, http://freespace.virgin.net/g.ramos-poqui/Philosophy/PreparePhD.html Accessed 14 September 2007.
292. Rawson, P. (1969), Drawing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
293. Rawson, P. (1973), The Art of Drawing, Prentice-Hall.
294. Rawson, P. (1979), Seeing through Drawing, British Broadcasting Corporation.
295. Reismann, C. (1993), Narrative Analysis Quantitative Reseach Methods, Sage.
296. Reynolds, Sir J. (1966), Discourses on Art, London: Collier Macmillan.
297. Riley, H. (2002), ‘Mapping the Domain of Drawing’, The International Journal of Art and Design, 21: 3, pp. 258–272.
298. Robbins, E. (1994), Why Architects draw, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
299. Robertson, A. (1987), ‘Borrowing and Artistic Behaviour: A Case-Study of the Development of Bruce’s Spontaneous Drawings from Six to Sixteen’, Studies in Art Education, 29: 1, pp. 37–51.
300. Roe, A. (1952), ‘A psychologist examines sixty-four eminent scientists’, Scientific American, 187, pp. 21–25.
301. Root-Bernstein, Robert Scott (1984), ‘On Paradigms and Revolutions in Science and Art: The Challenge of Interpretation’, Art Journal, 44: 2, Part I, Life Sciences Summer, pp. 109–118.
302. Rothenberg, A. (1988), ‘Creativity and the homospatial process’, Experimental Studies, 11: 3, Psychiatric Clinic, North Am., pp. 443–59.
303. Rudrauf, D., Lutz, A., Cosmelli, D., Lachaux, J.P. and Le Van Queyen, M. (2003), ‘From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela’s exploration of the biophysics of being’, Biological Research, 36: 1, pp. 27–65.
304. Runco, M. A. (2004), ‘Creativity’, Annual Review of Psychology, 55, pp. 657–87.
305. Ruskin, J. (1971), The Elements of Drawing, New York, NY: Dover Publications.
306. Ryecroft, C. (1980), Imagination and Reality, London: Maresfield Library.
307. Ryle, G. (1984), The Concept of Mind, London: Hutchison.
308. Sawdon, P. (2003), ‘In Other Words It Is An Essay’, Unpublished manuscript.
309. Schön, D. A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London: Temple Smith.
310. Scott, T. E. (1999), ‘Knowledge’, in M. Runco and S.R. Prittzker (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Creativity, San Diego, CA & London: Academic Press.
311. Scrivener, S. (2002), ‘The art object does not embody a form of knowledge’, Working Papers in Art and Design 2, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol2/scrivenerfull.html. Accessed 16 January 2005.
312. Sevanen, E. (2001), ‘Art as an Autopoietic Sub-System of Modern Society: A Critical Analysis of the Concepts of Art and Autopoietic Systems in Luhmann’s Late Production Theory’, Culture and Society, 18: 1, Sage.
313. Shanken, E. A. (1997), ‘Technology and Intuition: A Love Story? Roy Ascott’s Telematic Embrace’, Leonardo, 30: 1.
314. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2000), ‘The Primacy of Movement’, Psycoloquy, 11: 98, http://psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/perl/search?year=2000. Accessed 3 December 2007.
315. Shoemaker, S. (1996), The First Person Perspective and other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
316. Simon, H. (2003), ‘Artificial intelligence as a framework for understanding intuition’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 24: 2, pp. 265–277.
317. Simonton, D. K. (1988), ‘Creativity, leadership, and chance’, in R.J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
318. Smith, Barry and Casati, Robereto (1994), ‘Naive Physics: An Essay in Ontology’, Philosophical Psychology, 7: 2, pp. 225–244.
319. Smith, N. R. (1985), ‘Copying and Artistic Behaviours: Children and Comic Strips’, Studies in Art Education, 26: 3, pp. 147–156.
320. Snow, C.P. (1964), The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
321. Soarsa, J. (2006), ‘Drawing as a method of exploring and interpreting ordinary verbal interaction; an investigation through contemporary practice’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Loughborough, https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2134/2805/3/Master_Document_Saorsa_Thesis.pdf. Accessed 8 October 2007.
322. Spence, C. (2003), The ICI Report on the Secrets of the Senses, London: The Communication Group.
323. Stackhouse, A. (2006), ‘Trahere: The Sense of unease in making a mark, the practice of drawing and the practice of thinking’, Ph.D. thesis, Dundee School of Art.
324. Starszakowna, N. (2002), ‘The Concept of Knowledge’, Working Papers in Art and Design 2, http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/papers/wpades/vol2/norma.html. Accessed 3 May 2007.
325. Straus, C. and Quinn, N. (2003), A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
326. Sullivan, G. (2005), Art Practice as Research Inquiry in the Visual Arts, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
327. Sullivan, P. (2004), ‘Lived Experience and the visual artists’ accounts of making art’, Ph.D. thesis, University College, Cork, Ireland.
328. Talbot, Elizabeth, Talbot, Neil and Talbot, Richard (2006), Space time and other stuff, Catalogue for the exhibition ‘Painting Sculpture and Drawing’ at the Red Box Gallery, Newcastle Upon Tyne. 28 September–8 November 2006.
329. Talbot, R. (2003), ‘Speculations on the Origin of Linear Perspective including analyses of Masaccio’s Trinity and Piero’s Flagellation’, Nexus Network Journal, 5: 1, Spring, pp. 64–98, http://www.nexusjournal.com/Talbot-pt01.html. Accessed 21 April 2007.
330. Talbot, R. (2006), ‘The Design and Perspective Construction of the Chalice: Why is the Chalice the shape it is?’, in Sylvie Duvernoy and Orietta Pedemonte (eds.), Nexus VI: Architecture and Mathematics [in publication].
331. Tarr, J. (2004), ‘Wise bodies: Movement Re-Education, Subjectivity and Embodied Discourse’, Ph.D. thesis, London: Sociology Department, Goldsmiths University.
332. Taylor, P. (1960), The Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci, New York: The New American Library Inc.
333. Tebby, S. (1983), ‘Patterns of Organisation in Constructed Art’, Ph.D. thesis, Leicester: Leicester Polytechnic.
334. Thompson, D’Arcy Wentworth (1961), On Growth and Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
335. Thompson, E. (1999), Human Consciousness: Integrating Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (Abridged), Report to the Fetzer Institute on the Symposium held at Seasons, 24–27 September, http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/pcsreport.html. Accessed 6 May 2007.
336. Thompson, E. (2001), ‘Obituary for Francesco Varela’, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-12-thompson.html. Accessed 14 October 2005.
337. Thompson, E. (2005), ‘Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4: 4, December, pp. 407–427.
338. Thompson, F. and Varela, F. (2001), ‘Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5: 10, pp. 418–425.
339. Thompson, E., Lutz, A. and Cosmelli, D. (2005), ‘Neurophenomenology: An Introduction for Neurophilosophers’, in A. Brook and K. Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and neuroscience movement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40–97, http://brainimaging.waisman.wisc.edu/~lutz/ET&AL&DC.Neuropheno_intro_2004.pdf. Accessed 21 September 2007.
340. Thomson, H. (1969), ‘The relationship between the capacity for logical thinking and creativity’, Ph.D. thesis, Birmingham: Birmingham University.
341. Titherington, T. (1982), ‘The decision making processes of the painter: A Personal description of the act of painting, together with a commentary on the writings on art and selected artists and a critique of the work of Rudolf Arnheim’, M Litt. Thesis, Lancaster: University of Lancaster.
342. Torrance, E. P. (1971), ‘Are the Torrance Tests of creative thinking biased against or in favour of “disadvantaged groups?”’, Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, pp. 75–80.
343. Torrance, E.P. (1988), ‘The Nature Of Creativity As Manifest In Its Testing’, in R.J Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
344. Treffinger, D. J., Issakson, S. C, and Dorvall, K. B. (1995), ‘Creative Problem Solving: An Overview’, in M. Joyce, S. Isakson, G. Puccio, F. Davidson and C. Coppage (eds.), An Introduction to Creativity, Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group, pp. 114–24.
345. Tucker, N. (1959), ‘An Experimental Drawing Course Based on Old Masters’, College Art Journal, 18: 3, pp. 228–235.
346. Turner, Mark (2006), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
347. Tversky, B. (1999), ‘What does drawing reveal about thinking?’, in J.S. Gero and B. Tversky (eds.), Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, Sydney: Key Centre for Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 93–101.
348. Tyler, C. W. and Ione, A. (2001), ‘The Concept of Space in Twentieth Century Art’, in B.E Rogowitz and T.N Pappas (eds.), Human Vision and Electronic Imaging: Proceedings of Photonics West, Technical Conference sponsored by The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) and the Society for Imaging Science and Technology (IS&T), San Jose, California, http://www.ski.org/CWTyler_lab?CWTyler?Art%20Investigations/20th_Space/C20thSpace.html. Accessed on 08 October 2007.
349. Varela, F. (1976), ‘Not one, not two’, CoEvolution Quart, 12, pp. 62–67.
350. Varela, F. (1977), ‘On being autonomous: The lessons of natural history for systems theory’, in G. Klir, (ed.), Applied Systems Research, New York, NY: Plenum Press, pp. 77–85.
351. Varela, F. J. (1979), Principles of Biological Autonomy, New York, NY: Elsevier/North-Holland.
352. Varela, F. (1980), ‘Describing the logic of the living’, in M. Zeleny (ed.), Autopoeisis: A theory of the living organization, New York, NY: North-Holland, pp. 36–48.
353. Varela, F. (1984), ‘Two principles for self-organization’, in H. Ulrich and G. Probst (eds.), Selforganization and Management of Social Systems, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 25–33.
354. Varela, F.J. (1986), ‘Laying down a path in walking: a biologist’s look at a new biology’, Cybernetic, 2 pp. 6–15.
355. Varela, F. J. (1995), ‘The Emergent Self ’, in J. Brockman (ed.), The Third Culture; Beyond the Scientific Revolution, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
356. Varela, F. (1995), ‘The re-enchantment of the concrete’, in L. Steels and Brooks (eds.), The Artificial Life route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Embodied, Situated Agents, New Haven, CT: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, pp. 11–20.
357. Varela, F.J. (1996), ‘Neurophenomenology: A Methodological remedy to the hard problem’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, pp. 330–350.
358. Varela, F. (1997a), ‘Patterns of Life: Intertwining identity and cognition’, Brain Cognition, 34, pp. 72–87.
359. Varela, F. (1997b), ‘The Naturalization of Phenomenology as the Transcendence of Nature: searching for generative mutual constraints’, Revue de Phénoménologie, 5, pp. 355–385.
360. Varela, F. (1997c), ‘Metaphor to mechanism: Natural to disciplined’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4, pp. 344–346.
361. Varela, F.J. (1999a), ‘The specious present: the neurophenomenology of time consciousness’, in J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J-M. Roy (eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 266–314.
362. Varela, F. (1999b), ‘Steps to a science of Interbeing: unfolding the Dharma implicit in modern cognitive science’, in S. Bachelor, G. Claxton, and G. Watson (eds.), The Psychology of Awakening: Buddhism, Science and Our Day to Day Lives, New York, NY: Rider/Random House, pp. 71–89.
363. Varela, F. and Depraz, N. (2000), ‘The gesture of awareness: an account of its structural dynamics’, in M. Velmans (ed.), Investigating Phenomenal Consciousness, Amsterdam: Benjamin Publishers.
364. Varela, F. and Duprey, J-P. (eds.) (1992), Understanding Origins: Contemporary Views on the origin of life, mind and society, Dortrecht/Boston/London: Klewer Academic Publications.
365. Varela, F. and Maturana, H. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston, MA: Shambhala Press.
366. Varela, F., Maturana, H. and Uribe, G. (1974), ‘Autopoiesis: the organisation of living systems – its characterisation and a model’, Biosystems, 5, pp. 187–96.
367. Varela, F. and Sher, J. (1999a), The View from Within: First-Person Methodologies in the Study of Consciousness, London: Imprint Academic.
368. Varela, F. and Shear, J. (1999b), ‘First Person Accounts: Why, what and how?’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6: 2–3, pp. 1–14.
369. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human experience, Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
370. Velmans, M. (2004), Investigating Phenomenological Consciousness, Amsterdam: Benjamin Publishers.
371. Vernon, P. (1982), Creativity: Selected Readings, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
372. Vinacke, W.E. (1953), The Psychology of Thinking, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
373. Wallace, B. (1999), ‘The Buddhist Tradition of Samatha; Methods of Refining and Examining Consciousness’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6: 2/3, pp. 175–187.
374. Wallace, D. B. and Gruber, H. E. E. (1989), Creative people at work: twelve cognitive case studies, New York, NY & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
375. Wallis, G. (1926), The Art of Thought, Jonathan Cape.
376. Walwin, J. and Krokatsis, H. (2006), Drawing and Random Interference, London: Hayward Gallery.
377. Warner, W. S. and McGill, I. (eds.) (1989), Making sense of experiential learning: diversity in theory and practice, Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
378. Watson, J. D. (1968), The Double Helix: A personal account of the discovery of DNA, New York, NY: Athenium.
379. Weiss, J. (2004), ‘Language in the vicinity of art: artists’ writings, 1960–1975’, ArtForum, Summer.
380. Welton, M. (2002), ‘Sense and Self: Towards an Embodied Epistemology of Acting’, D.Phil., University of Surrey.
381. Wertheimer, M. (1945), Productive Thinking, New York NY: Harper.
382. Wijers, L. (1990), Art meets Science and Spirituality, Art and Design, Academy Editions.
383. Willats, J. (1997), Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
384. Wilson, M. (2002), ‘Six views of Embodied Cognition’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 4, 1 December, pp. 625–636, http://philosophy.wisc.edu/shapiro/PHIL951/951articles/wilson.htm. Accessed 8 April 2007.
385. Wilson, B., Hurwitz, A. and Wilson, M. (1987), Teaching Drawing from Art, Worcester, MA: Davis Publications.
386. Wilson, M. and Wilson, B. (1977), ‘An Iconoclastic view of the imagery sources – in the drawings of young people’, Art Education, 30 pp. 4–11.
387. Wilson, T and Schooler, J. (1991), ‘Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 2, pp. 181–192.
388. Wilson, M. and Wilson, B. (1982), Teaching Children to Draw, Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice Hall.
389. Winner, Ellen (1989), ‘How Can Chinese Children Draw so Well?’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 23: 1, pp. 41–63.
390. Wolpert, L. (2002), ‘Which side are you on?’, The Observer, 10 March 2002.
391. Woods, J. (2005), ‘Re: “Is the dissertation a dead dog?”’, Posting to the Drawing Research Network, Reference Lost.
392. Woolf, J. (1988), ‘Experiential learning in professional education; concepts and tools’, New Directions for Experiential Learning, 8, p.17.
393. Wyatt, R. (1998), The Drawing Tutorial in the Context of the Undergraduate Fine Art Curriculum: Drawing Across Boundaries; International Drawing Symposium.
394. Zahavi, D. (2009), ‘Is the self a social construct?’ Inquiry S2/6, pp. 551–573.