Stochastic propositionalization of non-determinate background knowledge

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1446, Issue , 1998, Pages 80-94

  Kramer, Stefan ^a   Pfahringer, Bernhard ^a   Helma, Christoph ^b  

^a AUSTRIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE   (Austria)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

BACK-GROUND KNOWLEDGE; CONSTRUCTIVE INDUCTION; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION; ENGINEERING DOMAINS; GRAPH-LIKE STRUCTURES; PROPOSITIONALIZATION; RELATIONAL REPRESENTATIONS; STOCHASTIC ALGORITHMS;

INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP);

EID: 84947420409     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0027312     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. H. Blockeel and L. DeRaedt. Top-down induction of logical decision trees. Technical Report CW 247, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 1997.
2. A. Blum. Learning boolean functions in an infinite attribute space. Machine Learning, 9(4), 1992.
3. W. W. Cohen. Pac-learning nondeterminate clauses. In Proc. Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-90), 1994.
4. W. W. Cohen. Learning trees and rules with set-valued features. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), pages 709-716, 1996.
5. D. J. Cook and L. B. Holder. Substructure discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1: 231-255, 1994.
6. S. Džeroski and B. Kompare, 1995. Personal Communication.
7. P. Geibel and F. Wysotzki. Relational learning with decision trees. In Proc. Twelfth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-96), pages 428-432, 1996.
8. A. Giordana, L. Saltta, and F. Zini. Learning disjunctive concepts by means of genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 96-104, 1994.
9. R. D. King and A. Srinivasan. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1997.
10. M. Kovai. MILP: a stochastic approach to Inductive Logic Programming. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-94), GMD-Studien Nr. 237, pages 123-138, 1994.
11. N. Lavrac and S. Džerosld. Inductive Logic Programming. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, Ut4, 1994.
12. S. Muggieton. Inverse Entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13: 245-286, 1995.
13. J. R. Qninlan. Learning logical definitions from relations. Machine Learning, 5: 239-266, 1990.
14. J. R. Qnirdan. C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. 1993.
15. J. R. Qninlan. The minimum description length principle and categorical theories. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, San Mateo, CA, 1994. Morgan Kaufmarm.
16. J. Rissanen. Modefing by shortest data description. Automatica, 14: 465-471, 1978.
17. M. Sebag and C. Rouveirol. Tractable induction and classification in first order logic via stochastic matching. In Proc. Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), pages 888-893, San Mateo, CA, 1997. Morgan Kaufmarm.
18. G. Silverstein and M. J. Pazzani. Relational cliches: Constraining constructive induction during relational learning. In L. A. Birnbaum and G. C. Collins, editors, Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop (ML91), pages 203-207, San Mateo, CA, 1991. Morgan Kaufmarm.
19. A. Srinivasan and R. D. King. Feature construction with Inductive Logic Programming: a study of quantitative predictions of chemical activity aided by structural attributes. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-96), 1996.
20. A. Srinivasan, S. Muggleton, and R. D. King. Comparing the use of background knowledge by Inductive Logic Programming systems. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (IL P-95), pages 199-230. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1995.
21. A. Srinivasan, S. Muggleton, R. D. King, and M. Steruberg. Mutagenesis: ILP experiments in a non-determinate biological domain. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-90), GMD-Studien Nr. 237, pages 217-232, 1994.
22. P. Turney. Low size-complexity Inductive Logic Programming: the East-West challenge considered as a problem in cost-sensitive classification. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP-95), pages 247-263. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1995.
23. J. D. Zucker and J. G. Ganascia. Representation changes for efficient learning in structural domains. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 543-551, 1996.