Reinforcing the rule of law: What States can and should do to reduce illegal immigration

Strange Neighbors: The Role of States in Immigration Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 99-129

  Kobach, Kris W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947328737     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. National Conference of State Legislators, Immigrant Policy Project, 2007 Enacted State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration1 (2008), available at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/immig/2007immigrationfinal.htm.
2. National Conference of State Legislators, Julia Preston, In Reversal, Courts Uphold Local Immigration Laws, N.Y. Times, Feb 10, 2008, at 81.
3. Robert Rector, Look to Milton, National Review, June 20, 2007.
4. Robert Rector, “The Fiscal Cost of Low-Skill Immigrants to State and Local Taxpayers,” Heritage Foundation Study (testimony before the Subcommittee on Immigration Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Rep., May 17, 2007).
5. Robert Rector, “Arizona: Illegal Aliens,” Federation for American Immigration Reform Report (2007), available at http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer? pagename=research_research82b2.
6. Jack Martin, “Breaking the Piggy Bank: How Illegal Immigration Is Sending Schools into the Red,” Federation for American Immigration Reform Report (2007).
7. Steven A. Camarota, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Center for Immigration Studies Report, Aug. 2004, at 5.
8. Steven A. Camarota, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” 2013 U.S.
9. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Case No. 07-3531 (3d Cir.), Appx. A2291-93.
10. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Case No. 3:06-CV-01586-JMM (M.D. Pa.), Doc. No. 219-2 (March 21, 2007), at 4.
11. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Case No. 3:06-CV-01586-JMM (M.D. Pa.), Doc. No. 219-3 (Mar. 21, 2007), at 4.
12. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” A1382-83, A1674.
13. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” A2482-83.
14. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (West 2008).
15. Kris W. Kobach, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” 2933, June 28, 2005.
16. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Case No. 07-3531 (3d Cir.), Appx. at 2483-2484.
17. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Case No. 07-3531 (3d Cir.), Appx A2490-91.
18. Lozano v. Hazleton, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Federal Bureau of Prison “Quick Facts,” available at http://www.bop.gov/news/quick.jsp#1(last visited Apr. 8, 2008).
19. DeCanas v. Bica, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,”Federal Bureau of Prison “Quick Facts,”424 U.S. 351, 357 (1976).
20. DeCanas v. Bica, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” Federal Bureau of Prison “Quick Facts,”424 U.S. 351, 357 (1976).
21. DeCanas v. Bica, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,”De Canas,424 U.S. at 355.
22. DeCanas v. Bica, “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,”De Canas,424 U.S. at 355.
23. Oklahoma H.B. “The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget,” De Canas, 1804 (2007); Missouri Conf. Comm. Subst.
24. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Immigration Federal Ruling: Prop. 200 Now Law in Arizona, Arizona Republic, Dec. 23, 2004, at 66.
25. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Immigration Federal Ruling: Prop. 200 Now Law in Arizona, Illegal aliens are generally not “qualified aliens,” with a few exceptions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1641 (West 2008).
26. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Immigration Federal Ruling: Prop. 200 Now Law in Arizona, Illegal aliens are generally not “qualified aliens,” with a few exceptions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1641 (West 2008).
27. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Immigration Federal Ruling: Prop. 200 Now Law in Arizona, Illegal aliens are generally not “qualified aliens,” with a few exceptions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1641 (West 2008).
28. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Immigration Federal Ruling: Prop. 200 Now Law in Arizona, Illegal aliens are generally not “qualified aliens,” with a few exceptions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1641 (West 2008).
29. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Immigration Federal Ruling: Prop. 200 Now Law in Arizona, Illegal aliens are generally not “qualified aliens,” with a few exceptions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1641 (West 2008).
30. Susan Carroll & Yvonne Wingett, Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the Verification Information System Supporting Verification Programs, Apr. 1, 2007, at 18.
31. Friendly House v. Napolitano, Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the Verification Information System Supporting Verification Programs, D.C. No. CV-04-00649-DCB (Dist. of AZ).
32. Friendly House v. Npaolitano, Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the Verification Information System Supporting Verification Programs, 419 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
33. Samuel v. Wilson, Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the Verification Information System Supporting Verification Programs, 908 F.Supp. 755, 770 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
34. Samuel v. Wilson, Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the Verification Information System Supporting Verification Programs, 908 F.Supp. 755, 770 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
35. Samuel v. Wilson, Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Impact Assessment for the Verification Information System Supporting Verification Programs, 908 F.Supp. 755, 770 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
36. Kris W. Kobach, Immigration Nullification: In-State Tuition and Lawmakers Who Disregard the Law,10 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y 473 (2007).
37. Linda Chavez, What to Do about Immigration, Commentary, Mar. 1995, at 29.
38. Linda Chavez, What to Do about Immigration, Commentary, Mar. 1995, at 2951.
39. Linda Chavez, Day v. Bond, What to Do about Immigration, Commentary,500 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2007) (decided solely on standing grounds, with no discussion of the merits);
40. Linda Chavez, Martinez v. Regents of the Univ. of Calif., 50 Cal. 4th1277 (2010).
41. Linda Chavez. Christian Palmer, Arizona Voters OK 4 Immigration easures, Ariz. Capitol Times, Nov. 7, 2006, at 1.
42. Ariz. Sec’y of State, Arizona Voters OK 4 Immigration easures 2006 General Election-Ballot Measures, http://www.azsos.gov/results/2006/general/BM300.htm(last visited Apr. 8, 2008).
43. Jennifer W. Sanchez, Immigration Worries: A Cold Welcome, Salt Lake Trib., June 22, 2006.
44. David Gutman, Motivated by Referendums, Maryland Voters Turn Out on Election Day, Capital News Service, Nov. 6, 2012.
45. David Gutman, Motivated by Referendums, Maryland Voters Turn Out on Election Day, Capital News Service, 305 F. Supp.2d 585, 603 (2004).
46. David Gutman, Motivated by Referendums, Maryland Voters Turn Out on Election Day, Capital News Service 8 U.S.C. § 1324a (West 2008).
47. David Gutman, Secretaries Chertoff, Gutierrez Speak on Border Security, Administrative Immigration Reforms at Press Conference, U.S. FED. NEWS, Aug. 10, 2007.
48. Ariz. H.B. Secretaries Chertoff, Gutierrez Speak on Border Security, Administrative Immigration Reforms at Press Conference (2007), codified at Ariz. Rev. Stat. 23-212 to 214.
49. Daniel Gonzalez, Apartments Going Empty as Hiring Law Hits Migrants, Arizona Republic, Jan. 31, 2008, at 1.
50. Randal C. Archibold, Arizona Seeing Signs of Flight by Immigrants, N.Y. Times, Feb. 12, 2008, at 78.
51. Sheryl Kornman, Sonoran Officials Slam Sanctions Law in Tucson Visit, Tucson Citizen, Jan. 16, 2008, at 69.
52. Kris W. Kobach, The Immigration Answer, N.Y. Post, Feb. 13, 2008.
53. Kris W. Kobach, The Immigration Answer, South Carolina S. 20 (2011); Georgia H.B. 87 (2011); Alabama H.B. 56 (2011).
54. Kris W. Kobach, The Immigration Answer Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 131 S. Ct. 1968 (2011).
55. Ariz. H.B. The Immigration Answer Missouri Conf. Comm. Subst. for H.B. 1549, 1771, 1395, and 2366 (2008), 285.530.
56. Ariz. H.B. The Immigration Answer Missouri Conf. Comm. Subst. for H.B. 1549, 1771, 1395, and 2366 (2008), 285.535.
57. Oklahoma H.B. The Immigration Answer (2007), codified at 25 Okla. Stat. 1313; Mississippi S.B. 81 (2008).
58. Arizona’s H.B. which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting,131 S. Ct. 1968 (2011), and Valley Park.
59. Oklahoma H.B. which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, (2007), codified at 21 Okla. Stat. 446.
60. Utah S.B. which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting,(2008), codified at Utah Stat. Ann.
61. Gonzales v. Peoria, which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 722 F.2d 468, 474 (9th Cir. 1983) (citing Florida Avocado Growers v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 142 (1963)) (emphasis added).
62. Marsh v. which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, United States, 29 F.2d 172, 174 (2d Cir. 1928).
63. Arizona v. Salazar, which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, United States, C.R. 2006-005932-003DT, Slip Op. at 9.
64. United States v. Aguilar, which was sustained against a preemption challenge in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, United States 883 F.2d 662, 669-70 (9th Cir. 1989) (providing apartment to illegal aliens found to constitute harboring).
65. United States v. Aguilar, which was sustained against a preemption challenge Lozano, Farmers Branch, supra, and Keller v. Fremont, Case Nos. 12-1702, 12-1705, 12-1708 (8th Cir. 2013).
66. U.S. GenWeb. Accounting Office, GAO-02-830T, Identity Fraud: Prevalence and Links to Alien Illegal Activities (2002) (statement of Richard M. Stana).
67. U.S. GenWeb. Accounting Office Tara Alexandra Rainson, Identity Theft Laws: State Penalties and Remedies and Pending Federal Bills, CRS Report for Congress, June 1, 2007, at 2-3, available at www.opencrs.com/rpts/RL34028_20070601.pdf.
68. Kris W. Kobach, The Quintessential Force Multiplier: The Inherent Authority of Local Police to Make Immigration Arrests,69 Albany L. Rev. 179 (2005).
69. Kris W. Kobach, The Quintessential Force Multiplier: The Inherent Authority of Local Police to Make Immigration Arrests United States v. Salinas-Calderon, 728 F.2d 1298, 1301 n.3 (10th Cir. 1984).
70. Kris W. Kobach, The Quintessential Force Multiplier: The Inherent Authority of Local Police to Make Immigration Arrests United States v. Vasquez-Alvarez, 176 F.3d 1294, 1295-96 (10th Cir. 1999).
71. Kris W. Kobach, State Immigration Law Training and Enforcement Programs Enhance Homeland Security and Public Safety, State News Service, Dec. 7, 2007;
72. Seth Blomeley, Just Learned of Law on Aliens, Beebe Says Act Lets State Police Aid Federal Authorities, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Sept. 20, 2007.
73. Janice Francis-Smith. U.S. Rep. Istook Questions Lengthy Process for ICE Application, Journal Record, Sept. 14, 2006.
74. Janice Francis-Smith, Gov. Blunt Outlines Law Enforcement Directives to Fight Illegal Immigration, State News Service, Oct. 30, 2007.
75. Oklahoma H.B.Gov. Blunt Outlines Law Enforcement Directives to Fight Illegal Immigration, (2007), codified at 74 Okla. Stat. 20j (West 2008).
76. Oklahoma H.B.Gov. Blunt Outlines Law Enforcement Directives to Fight Illegal Immigration, Utah S.B. 81, codified at Utah Code Ann. 17-22-9.5 (West 2008).
77. Oklahoma H.B. Gov. Blunt Outlines Law Enforcement Directives to Fight Illegal Immigration U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, The Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Removal of Aliens Issued Final Orders, Report Number 1-2003-004 (February 2003). available at http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/INS/e0304/final.pdf.
78. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Press Release, Local ICE Fugitive Operations Team Arrests 24 in 4-Day Operation, Feb. 26, 2008, available at http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/080226madison.htm.
79. Tom LoBianco, O’Malley Says State Will Use Real ID, Wash. Times, Jan. 16, 2008, at 67.
80. Tom LoBianco, Opinion of Michael Cox, Attorney General of Michigan, “Permanent Residency Requirement for Driver’s Licenses,” Dec. 27, 2007, available at http://www. ag.state.mi.us/opinion/datafiles/2000s/op10286.htm.
81. Tom LoBianco, Devona Walker, Immigration: Construction Industry Sees Fewer Undocumented Workers Applying for Jobs: Housing Decline Offsets Shortage, Oklahoman, Feb. 9, 2008, at 66.