Protocol for a process-oriented qualitative evaluation of the Waltham Forest and East London Collaborative (WELC) integrated care pioneer programme using the researcherin-residence model

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Eyre, Laura ^a   George, Bethan ^b   Marshall, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Tower Hamlets Health Strategy Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; EPISTEMOLOGY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; ONTOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL CARE; COOPERATION; ENGLAND; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL MEDICINE; STANDARDS;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; LONDON; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL MEDICINE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84947288007     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009567     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Shortell S, Addicott R, Walsh N, et al. Accountable care organisations in the United States and England: testing, evaluating and learning what works. London: The Kings Fund, 2014.
2. Kodner D. All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care. Healthc Q 2009;13(special issue):6-15.
3. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Personal Social Services: Expenditure and Unit Costs, England 2012-13, Final release. http://www.hscic.gov. uk/catalogue/PUB13085/pss-exp-eng-12-13-fin-rpt.pdf (accessed Mar. 2015).
4. Department of Health. Individuals in Receipt of NHS Continuing Healthcare. Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013. https://www.gov. uk/government/publications/nhs-continuinghealthcare (accessed Dec. 2014).
5. National Health Service. Five year forward view. 2014. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf (accessed Nov. 2014).
6. Local Government Association. Adult social care funding: 2014 state of the nation report. London: Local Government Association, 2014.
7. National Collaboration for Integrated Care and Support. Integrated care and support: our shared commitment. 2013. https://www.gov. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/198748/DEFINITIVE-FINAL-VERSION-Integrated-Care-and-Support-Our-Shared-Commitment-2013-05-13.pdf (accessed Oct. 2014).
8. Curry N, Ham C. Clinical and service integration: the route to improved outcomes. London: The Kings Fund, 2010.
9. Shaw S, Rosen R, Rumbold B. What is integrated care? London: The Nuffield Trust, 2011.
10. National Voices. A narrative for person-centred coordinated care. 2013. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/nv-narrative-cc.pdf (accessed Jan 2015).
11. Lewis R, Rosen R, Goodwin N, et al. Where next for integrated care organisations in the English NHS. London: The Nuffield Trust, 2010. http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/where-next-for-integrated-care-organisations-in-the-english-nhs-230310.pdf (accessed May 2015).
12. Humphries R, Curry N. Integrating health and social care: where next? London: The Kings Fund, 2011.
13. Ling T, Brereton L, Conklin A, et al. Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots. Int J Integr Care 2012;12:1-12.
14. Roland M, Lewis R, Steventon A, et al. Case management for at-risk elderly patients in the English Integrated Care Pilots: observational study of staff and patient experience and secondary care utilisation. Int J Integr Care 2012;12:1-21.
15. Bardsley M, Steventon A, Smith J, et al. Evaluating integrated and community based care: how do we know what works? London: Nuffield Trust, 2013.
16. Curry N, Harris M, Gunn L, et al. Integrated care pilot in north-west London: a mixed methods evaluation. Int J Integr Care 2013;13:e027.
17. Evans J, Baker G, Berta W, et al. The evolution of integrated health care strategies. Adv Health Care Manag 2013;15:125-61.
18. Nolte E, McKee M. Integration and chronic care: a review. In: Nolte E, McKee M, eds. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2008. http://www.euro.who.int/-data/assets/pdf-file/0006/96468/E91878.pdf (accessed 13 Apr. 2015).
19. Wistow G. Integration and the NHS reforms. Int J Integr Care 2011;19:5-13.
20. Ham C, Walsh N. Lessons from experience: making integrated care happen at scale and pace. London: The Kings Fund, 2013.
21. Addicott R. Commissioning and contracting for integrated care. London: The Kings Fund, 2014.
22. Knight M. Developing integration of health and social care in England. In: Farnsworth K, Irving Z, Fenger M, eds. Social policy review 26: analysis and debate in social policy. Bristol: Policy Press, 2014:279-94.
23. Goodwin N, Sonola L, Thiel V, et al. Co-ordinated care for people with complex conditions. Key lessons and markers for success. London: The King's Fund, 2013.
24. Mason A, Goddard M, Weatherly H, et al. Integrating funds for health and social care: an evidence review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2015;20:177-88.
25. Tsasis P, Evans J, Owens S. Reframing the challenges to integrated care: a complex-adaptive systems perspective. Int J Integr Care 2012;12:e190. http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/843/1890 (accessed Oct. 2014).
26. Marshall M, Pagel C, French C, et al. Moving improvement research closer to practice: the Researcher in Residence model. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:801-5. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/early/2014/06/03/bmjqs-2013-002779.full.pdf+html (accessed Oct. 2014).
27. Schon DA. The reflective practitioner; how professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith, 1983.
28. Barton WM. The interrelations of research and practice. JAMA 1912; LVIII: 1120-3.
29. Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues 1946;2:34-46.
30. Bate P. Synthesising research and practice; using the action research approach in health care settings. Soc Policy Adm 2000;34:478-93.
31. Marshall M. Bridging the ivory towers and the swampy lowlands; increasing the impact of health services research on quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2014;26:1-5.
32. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage, 1994.
33. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
34. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Mode 2 revisisted: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 2003;41:179-94.
35. Fairclough N. Language and power. London: Longman, 1989.
36. Fairclough N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
37. Fairclough N. Language and power. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson, 2001.
38. Fairclough N. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Milton Park: Routledge, 2003.
39. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited, 2010.
40. Wodak R. Disorders of discourse. London: Longman, 1996.
41. Wodak R. The discourse-historical approach. In: Wodak R, Meyer M, eds. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 2001:63-94.
42. Van Dijk TA. Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage, 1998.
43. Van Dijk TA. Contextual knowledge management in discourse production: A CDA perspective. In: Wodak R, Chilton P, eds. A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005:73-100.
44. Van Dijk TA. Discourse and power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
45. Chouliaraki L, Fairclough N. Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
46. Fairclough N, Wodak R. Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk TA, ed. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction, vol. 2: discourse as social interaction. London: Sage, 1997:258-84.
47. Wodak R, Fairclough N. Recontextualising European higher education policies: the cases of Austria and Romania. Crit Discourse Stud 2010;7:19-40.
48. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
49. Gillham B. Observation techniques: structured to unstructured. London: Continuum, 2008.
50. Spradley J. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
51. Angrosino M. Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage, 2007.
52. Jorgensen DL. Participant observation: a methodology for human studies (Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1989.
53. Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
54. Fetterman DL. Ethnography: step-by-step. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2010.
55. Bryman A. Social research methods. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
56. Dornyei Z. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
57. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd edn. London: Sage, 2005:191-216.
58. Van Leeuwen TJ. Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: a synopsis. Discourse Soc 1993;4:193-223.
59. Van Leeuwen TJ. Representing social action. Discourse Soc 1995;6:81-106.
60. Van Leeuwen TJ. The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-Coulthard CR, Coulthard M, eds. Texts and practices: readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 1996:32-70.
61. Van Leeuwen TJ. Discourse and practice: new tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
62. Reisigl M, Wodak R. The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In: Wodak R, Meyer M, eds. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 2009:87-121.
63. King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage, 2010.