Legitimizing differentiated flood protection levels - Consequences of the European flood risk management plan

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 55, Issue , 2016, Pages 361-367

  Hartmann, Thomas ^a   Spit, Tejo ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

(Concepts of) legitimacy; Flood risk; Floods Directive; Paradigm shift; Planning theory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATCHMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; FLOODING; FLOODPLAIN; GOVERNMENT; MANAGER; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK MANAGEMENT; RIVER BASIN; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84947272734     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Albrecht J. Umweltqualitätsziele im Gewässerschutzrecht 2007, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
2. Allmendinger P. Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Plan. Theory 2002, 1(1):77-99.
3. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. AIP J. 1969, 35(4):216-224.
4. Assmann A. Dezentraler integrierter Hochwasserschutz. Hochwasserschutz heute 2001, 197-236. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin. S. Heiden, R. Erb, F. Sieker (Eds.).
5. Baum H.S. Toward a post-industrial planning theory. Policy Sci. 1977, 8(4):401-421.
6. Billé R. Integrated coastal zone management: four entrenched illusions. Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc. 2008, 1(2):75-86.
7. Birkholz S., Muro M., Jeffrey P., Smith H. Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 478:12-20. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061.
8. Boedeltje M., Cornips J. Input and Output Legitimacy in Interactive Governance 2004, http://hdl.handle.net/1765/1750 (accessed 12.04.14).
9. Boettcher R. Wird die Umweltplanung dem Problem Hochwasser gerecht?. Hochwasser. Natur im Überfluss? 1997, 115-144. C.F. Müller, Heidelberg. R. Immendorf (Ed.).
10. Brownill S., Carpenter J. Increasing participation in planning: Emergent experiences of the reformed planning system in England. Plan. Pract. Res. 2007, 22(4):619-634.
11. Brownill S., Carpenter J. Participation and planning: dichotomies, rationalities and strategies for power. Town Plan. Rev. 2007, 78(4):401-428.
12. Brown J.D., Damery S.L. Managing flood risk in the UK: towards an integration of social and technical perspectives. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 2002, 27(4):412-426. 10.1111/1475-5661.00063.
13. Davy B. Essential Injustice: When Legal Institutions Cannot Resolve Environmental and Land Use Disputes 1997, Springer, Wien, New York.
14. Donders M., Hartmann T., Kokx A. E-participation in urban planning: getting and keeping citizens involved. Int. J. E Plan. Res. 2014, 3(2):54-69.
15. Dreijerink L., Kruize H., van Kamp I. Burgerparticipatie in beleidsvorming: Resultaten van een verkennende literatuurreview. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM) 2008.
16. Enserink B., Monnikhof R.A. Information management for public participation in co-design processes: evaluation of a Dutch example. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2003, 46(3):315-344.
17. European Parliament and European Council Directive 2003/35/EC providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment: Directive 2003/35/EC 2003 2003.
18. Fagence M. Citizen Participation in Planning 1977, Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York.
19. Fleming G. Flood Risk Management: Learning to Live With Rivers 2002, Thomas Telford, London.
20. Fung A. Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Admin. Rev. 2006, 66-75. (special issue).
21. Fürst D. Raumplanung: Herausforderungen des deutschen Institutionensystems 2010, Rohn, Detmold.
22. Gearey M., Jeffrey P. Concepts of legitimacy within the context of adaptive water management strategies. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60(1):129-137. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.014.
23. Gerdes F. Wiederherstellung von Retentionsflächen: Fallanalyse der Retentionsflächen Köln-Langel und Köln-Worringen. Dortmund. 2008, (Unpublished diploma thesis).
24. Gilissen H., van Rijswick M., van Schoot T.D.2009 Water en ruimte: De bescherming van watersysteembelangen in het ruimtelijk spoor, Ruimtelijk relevant 1 2009, Berghauser Pont Publishing, Amsterdam. 1st ed.
25. Green C., Penning-Rowsell E.C. Stakeholder engagement in flood risk management. Flood Risk Science and Management 2010, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK. 10.1002/9781444324846. G. Pender, H. Faulkner (Eds.).
26. Green C. Competent authorities for the flood risk management plan: reflections on flood and spatial planning in England. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2014, 10.1111/jfr3.12097.
27. Hartmann T. Clumsy floodplains and the law: towards a responsive land policy for extreme floods. Built Environ. 2009, 35(4):531-544.
28. Hartmann T. Clumsy Floodplains: Responsive Land Policy for Extreme Floods 2011, Ashgate, Farnham.
29. Hartmann T. Land policy for German Rivers: Making space for the rivers. Making Space for the River. Governance Experiences With Multifunctional River Planning in the US and Europe 2012, 121-133. IWA Publishing, London. J.F. Warner, A. van Buuren, J. Edelenbos (Eds.).
30. Hartmann T. Rationaliteiten in ruimtelijke planvorming: Een theoretisch perspectief op participatiemanagement vanuit de burger. Bestuurswetenschappen 2012, 66(6):36-51.
31. Hartmann T. Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: planning as expectation management. Plan. Theory 2012, 11(3):242-256.
32. Hartmann T., Albrecht J. From flood protection to flood risk management: condition-based and performance-based regulations in German water law. J. Environ. Law 2014, 26(2):243-268. 10.1093/jel/equ015.
33. Hartmann T., Driessen P. The flood risk management plan: towards spatial water governance. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2013, 10.1111/jfr3.12077.
34. Hartmann T., Jüpner R. The flood risk management plan: an essential step towards the institutionalization of a paradigm shift. Int. J. Water Gov. 2014, 2(2):107-118. 10.7564/13-IJWG5.
35. Hartmann T., Jüpner R. The European flood risk management plan: Between spatial planning and water engineering 2014, (special issue).
36. Hartmann T., Jüpner R. Der Hochwasserrisikomanagementplan: Herausforderung für Wasserwirtschaft und Raumplanung. Wasserbaukolloquium 2013. Technischer und organisatorischer Hochwasserschutz 2013, 183-192. Dresdner Wasserbauliche Mitteilungen, Dresden. J. Stamm, K.-U. Graw (Eds.).
37. Healey P. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 1996, 23:217-234.
38. Healey P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies 1997, UBC Press, Vancouver.
39. Healey P. Collaborative planning in perspective. Plan. Theory 2003, 2(2):101-123.
40. Heer J.D., et al. Towards Integrated Water Legislation in the Netherlands 2004, Retrieved from: http://www.uu.nl/../TowardsIWL-finalreport.pdf (accessed 20.04.13).
41. Heiland P. Vorsorgender Hochwasserschutz durch Raumordnung, interregionale Kooperation und ökonomischen Lastenausgleich 2002, IWAR, Darmstadt.
42. Huxley M. The limits to communicative planning. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2000, 19:369-377.
43. Innes J.E., Booher D.E. Public Participation in Planning: New Strategies for the 21st Century 2000, University of California, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3r34r38h (accessed 16.11.11).
44. Innes J.E., Booher D.E. Planning With Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy 2010, Routledge, Milton Park.
45. Ison R., Röling N., Watson D. Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:499-511.
46. Johnson C.L., Priest S.J. Flood risk management in England: a changing landscape of risk responsibility. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008, 24(4):513-525.
47. Kamphorst D., Pleijte M., Kistenhas F., Kersten P.H. Nieuwe Wet ruimtelijke ordening: Nieuwe bestuurscultuur? WUR rapporten 69 2008, WUR, Wageningen.
48. Klijn F., Samuels P., van Os A. Towards flood risk management in the EU: State of affairs with examples from various European countries. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2008, 6(4):307-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635358.
49. Kluvánková-Oravská T. From Government to Governance? New Governance for Water and Biodiversity in an Enlarged Europe 2010, Alfa, Prague.
50. Krieger K. The limits and variety of risk-based governance: the case of flood management in Germany and England. Regul. Gov. 2013, 7(2):236-257.
51. Larsson S., 2014. Law and Spatial Planning: Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Development of Wind Power and 3G Mobile Infrastructures in Sweden 2014, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona.
52. Leino H., Laine M. Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation. Plan. Theory 2011, 11(1):1-15.
53. Loucks D.P., Stedinger J.R., Davis D.W., Stakhiv E.Z. Private and public responses to flood risks. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008, 24(4):541-553.
54. Michels A.M.B. Citizen participation and democracy in the Netherlands. Democratization 2006, 13(2):323-339.
55. Mickel W.W., Bergmann J.M., Grupp C.D. Handlexikon der Europäischen Union, Baden-Baden 2005.
56. Moon J.D. Rawls and Habermas on public reason: human rights and global justice. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2003, 6(1):257-274. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085715.
57. Moss T. The governance of land use river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy 2004, 21:85-94.
58. Moss T. Zwischen Ökologisierung Gewässerschutz und Kommerzialisierung der Wasserwirtschaft: Neue Handlungsanforderungen an Raumplanung und Regionalpolitik. Raumforsch. Raumordn. 2009, 1:54-68.
59. Moss T., Monstadt J. Restoring Floodplains in Europe: Policy Contexts and Project Experiences 2008, IWA Publishing, London.
60. Mostert E., Junier S. The European flood risk directive: challenges for research. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2009, 6:4961-4988.
61. Needham B. Dutch land use planning: Planning and managing land use in the Netherlands 2007, Sdu uitgevers, The Hague.
62. Newig J., Kvarda E. Participation in environmental governance: legitimate and effective?. Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness 2012, 29-45. Edward Elgar Publishing. K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, M. Pregernig (Eds.).
63. Newig J., Koontz T. Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU's mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. J. Eur. Public Policy 2014, 21(2):248-267.
64. Newig J., Challies E., Jager N., Kochskämper E. What role for public participation in implementing the EU Floods Directive? A comparison with the Water Framework Directive, early evidence from Germany, and a research agenda. Environ. Policy Gov. 2014, 24(4):275-288.
65. Nisipeanu P. Tradition oder Fortentwicklung? Wasserrecht im UGB. Nat. Recht 2008, 30:87-97.
66. Patt H. Hochwasser-Handbuch: Auswirkungen und Schutz 2001, Springer, Berlin.
67. Hochwasser Handbuch: Auswirkungen und Schutz 2013, Springer, Heidelberg. H. Patt, R. Jüpner (Eds.).
68. Project F01 2006/2007 Mehr Raum für den Hochwasserschutz durch konfliktarme Flächenmobilisierung. Final report of a student project at TU Dortmund University, Dortmund 2007.
69. Project F01 2008/2009 Effektiver Hochwasserschutz durch innovatives Bodenmanagement. Final report of a student project at TU Dortmund University, Dortmund 2009.
70. Reinhardt M. Der neue europäische Hochwasserschutz. Nat. Recht 2008, 30(7):468-473.
71. Renn O. Risk Governance: Coping With Uncertainty in a Complex World 2008, Earthscan, London.
72. Roth D., Warner J. Flood risk uncertainty and changing river protection policy in The Netherlands: the case of 'calamity polders'. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2007, 98(4):519-525.
73. Rydin Y. Actor-network theory and planning theory: a response to Boelens Yvonne Rydin. Plan. Theory 2010, 9(3):265-268.
74. Saurí-Pujol D., Roset-Pagès D., Ribas-Palom A., Pujol-Caussa P. The 'escalator effect' in flood policy: the case of the Costa Brava, Catalonia, Spain. Appl. Geogr. 2001, 21(2):127-143.
75. Scharpf F.W. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy 1997, Westview Press, Boulder.
76. Schmidt V.A. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and 'throughput'. Polit. Stud. 2013, 61(1):2-22. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x.
77. Sternberg E. An integrative theory of urban design. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2000, 66(3):265-278. 10.1080/01944360008976106.
78. Tempels B., Hartmann T. A co-evolving frontier between land and water: dilemmas of flexibility versus robustness in flood risk management. Water Int. 2014, 39(6):872-883. 10.1080/02508060.2014.958797.
79. van Buuren A., Klijn E.-H., Edelenbos J. Democratic legitimacy of new forms of water management in the Netherlands. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2012, 28(4):629-645. 10.1080/07900627.2011.627756.
80. van Coenen F., Rob P., Johan de W. De evolutie van inspraak in de Nederlandse planning. Beleidswetenschappen 2001, 15(4):313-332.
81. van den Brink M. Rijkswaterstaat on the Horns of a Dilemma 2009, Eburon, Delft.
82. van Eeten M. Dialogues of the Deaf: Defining New Agendas for Environmental Deadlocks 1999, Eburon, Delft.
83. van Steen P.J., Pellenbarg P.H. Water management challenges in The Netherlands. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2004, 95(5):590-598.
84. Making Space for the River: Governance Experiences With Multifunctional River Planning in the US and Europe 2012, IWA Publishing, London. J.F. Warner, A. van Buuren, J. Edelenbos (Eds.).
85. Wegener M. Government or governance? The challenge of planning for sustainability in the Ruhr. Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered 2012, 157-168. Ashgate, Farnham. T. Hartmann, B. Needham (Eds.).
86. Wesselink A. Flood safety in the Netherlands: the Dutch response to hurricane Katrina. Technol. Soc. 2007, 29(2):239-247.
87. Wesselink A., Paavola J., Fritsch O., Renn O. Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners' perspectives. Environ. Plan. A 2011, 43:2688-2704.
88. Wesselink A., Warner J., Kok M. You gain some funding, you lose some freedom: the ironies of flood protection in Limburg (The Netherlands). Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30:113-125. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.018.
89. White G.F. The limit of economic justification for flood protection. J. Land Public Utility Econ. 1936, 12(2):133-148.
90. Wiering M., Crabbé A. The institutional dynamics of water management in the low countries. Institutional dynamics in environmental governance, 2006, 93-114. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Arts, P. Leroy (Eds.).
91. Wiering M., Immink I. When water management meets spatial planning: a policy-arrangement perspective. Environ. Plan. C: Gov. Policy 2006, 26:423-438.