Coping with crosscutting software changes using information transparency

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2192, Issue , 2001, Pages 250-265

  Griswold, William G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Implementation techniques; Modularity; Programming methodology; Software evolution; Software maintenance

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; DESIGN; TRANSPARENCY;

IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES; INFORMATION HIDING; INFORMATION TRANSPARENCY; MODULARITY; PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY; PROGRAMMING STYLES; SOFTWARE DESIGNERS; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 84947204511     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45429-2_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. T. J. Biggerstaff, B. G. Mitbander, and D. Webster. The concept assignment problem in program understanding. In Proceedings of Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pp 27-43, May 1993.
2. F. P. Brooks. The Mythical Man Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
3. R. E. Crew. ASTLOG: A language for examining abstract syntax trees. In Proceedings of the USENIX Conference on Domain-Specific Languages, pp 229-42, October 1997.
4. S. G. Eick, J. L. Steffen, and J. E. E. Sumner. Seesoft - a tool for visualizing line-oriented software statistics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(11):957-968, November 1992.
5. W. G. Griswold, M. I. Chen, R. W. Bowdidge, and J. D. Morgenthaler. Tool support for planning the restructuring of data abstractions in large systems. In ACM SIGSOFT '96 Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp 33-45, October 1996.
6. W. G. Griswold and D. Notkin. Automated assistance for program restructuring. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2(3):228-269, July 1993.
7. W. G. Griswold and D. Notkin. Architectural tradeoffs for a meaning-preserving program restructuring tool. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(4):275-287, April 1995.
8. A. J. Gray. Development of an unanticipated member of a program family. Masters Thesis, University of California, San Diego, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, October 1997. Technical Report CS97-560.
9. W. G. Griswold, J. J. Yuan, and Y. Kato. Exploiting the map metaphor in a tool for software evolution. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 265-274, May 2001.
10. D. Jackson and M. Jackson. Problem decomposition for reuse. Software Engineering Journal, 11(1):19-30, January 1996.
11. G. Kiczales, E. Hilsdale, J. Hugunin, M. Kersten, J. Palm, and W. G. Griswold. An overview of AspectJ. In 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2001), pp 327-353, June 2001.
12. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, C. V. Lopes, C. Maeda, A. Mendhekar, and G. Murphy. Open implementation guidelines. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 481-490, May 1997.
13. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Mendhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J. M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect-oriented programming. In 11th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, pp 220-242. Springer-Verlag, June 1997.
14. B. J. MacLennan. Principles of Programming Languages: Design, Evaluation, and Implementation. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 2nd edition, 1987.
15. S. McConnell. Code Complete: A Practical Guide of Software Construction. Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, 1993.
16. G. C. Murphy and D. Notkin. Lightweight source model extraction. In ACM SIGSOFT '95 Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp 116-127, October 1995.
17. G. C. Murphy, D. Notkin, and K. Sullivan. Software reflexion models: bridging the gap between source and high-level models. In ACM SIGSOFT’95 Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp 18-28, October 1995.
18. D. Orleans and K. Lieberherr. DJ: Dynamic adaptive programming in Java. In Reflection 2001: Third International Conference on Metalevel Architectures and Separation of Crosscutting Concerns, September 2001.
19. H. Ossher and P. Tarr. Multi-dimensional separation of concerns and the hyperspace approach. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Architectures and Component Technology: The State of the Art in Software Development. Kluwer, 2000.
20. D. L. Parnas. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM, 15(12):1053-1058, December 1972.
21. D. L. Parnas. Why software jewels are rare. IEEE Computer, 29(2):57-60, February 1996.
22. D. L. Parnas, P. C. Clements, and D. M. Weiss. The modular structure of complex systems. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 408-417, March 1984.
23. D. L. Parnas, G. Handzel, and H. Wurges. Design and specification of the minimal subset of an operating system family. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4):301-307, December 1976.
24. R. W. Schwanke. An intelligent tool for re-engineering software modularity. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 83-92, May 1991.
25. C. R. Turner. Feature Engineering of Software Systems. PhD thesis, University of Colorado, Department of Computer Science, May 1999.
26. M. J. Vilot. An introduction to the Standard Template Library. C++ Report, 6(8):22-29, 35, October 1994.
27. M. Van Hilst and D. Notkin. Decoupling change from design. In ACM SIGSOFT’96 Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pp 58-69, October 1996.
28. S. Wu and U. Manber. agrep-afast approximate pattern-matching tool. In Proceedings of the Winter 1992 USENIX Conference, pp 153-162, 1991.