Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1347-1387

  Söderlund, Therese ^a   Madison, Guy ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Citations; Gender studies; Impact factor

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947130324     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1702-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Academy of Finland. (2002). Women’s Studies and Gender Research in Finland (Evaluation Report, 8/02). Helsinki: Publications of the Academy of Finland.
2. Bergman, S. (2000). A Bird’s Eye on Women’s Studies in the Nordic Countries—Summary in English. In S. Bergman (Ed.), Nordisk kvinno- och könsforskning under 20 år. Satsningar och samarbete (pp. 47–49). NIKK Småskrifter nr. 5.
3. Bondestam, F. (2005). Könsmedveten pedagogik för universitets- och högskolelärare – en introduktion och bibliografi [Gender conscious pedagogy for university professors – an introduction and bibliography]. Stockholm: Liber.
4. Bondestam, F. (2010). Kunskap som befrielse? En metaanalys av svensk forskning om jämställdhet och skola 1969–2009 [Knowledge as liberation? A meta analysis of Swedish research of equality and school 1969–2009]. SOU 2010:35. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
5. Bowles, G. (1983). Is Women’s Studies an academic discipline? In G. Bowles & R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 32–45). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Dehdarirad, T., Villarroya, A., & Barrios, M. (2015). Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103, 795–812.
7. Ganetz, H. (2005). Uppföljning av Vetenskapsrådets beredning och utfall av genusvetenskapliga projektansökningar inom humaniora-samhällsvetenskap år 2004 [Follow up of the Swedish Research Council’s preparation and outcome of gender studies project applications within the humanities and social sciences year 2004]. Swedish Research Council’s Committee for Gender Research. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
8. Gothenburg University Library. (2013). KvinnSam—National resource library for gender studies. www.ub.gu.se/kvinn. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
9. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10. Harzing, A.W. (2007). Publish or Perish.http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
11. Jacobsson, C., & Wadskog, D. (2006). Indicators of scientific quality. In H. Ganetz (Ed.), Reaching for scientific excellence in gender research (pp. 53–62). Stockholm: Swedish Research Council (6:2006).
12. Kantola, J., & Nousiainen, K. (2009). Institutionalizing intersectionality in Europe. International Feminist Journal of Politics,11(4), 459–477.
13. König, C. J., Fell, C. B., Kellnhofer, L., & Schui, G. (2015). Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology? Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1646-y.
14. Liinason, M. (2011). Feminism and the academy. Exploring the politics and institutionalisation in gender studies in Sweden. (Doctoral thesis). Lund: Centre for Gender Studies, Lund University.
15. Liinason, M., & Holm, U. M. (2008). PhDs, women’s/gender studies and interdisciplinarity. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research,14(2), 115–130.
16. Lykke, N. (2001). Institutionalization—between successor-discipline and transdisciplinary challenge notes on conceptual frameworks. In N. Lykke, C. Michel, & M.P. de la Bellacasa (Eds.), Women’s studies—from institutional innovations to new jobqualifications (pp. 18–24). ATHENA Panel Report, University of Southern Denmark.
17. Lykke, N. (2006). Gender research and excellence. Some recommendations and future perspectives. In H. Ganetz (Ed.), Reaching for scientific excellence in gender research (pp. 64–75). Stockholm: Swedish Research Council (6:2006).
18. Lykke, N., Mellström, U., & Gustavson, M. (2006). Genus som staerkt forskningsfelt [Gender as a strong research field]. Linköping: Filosofisk fakultet, Linköpings universitet.
19. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs,30(3), 1771–1800.
20. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. (2006). Regleringsbrev för budgetåret 2007 avseende universitet och högskolor m.m. Regeringsbeslut I:54 [Government approval document of the budget year 2007 concerning universities etc. Cabinet Decision I:54]. Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
21. Nationalencyklopedin. (2015). Genusforskning [Gender research]. http://www.ne.se/uppslagsverk/encyklopedi/lång/genusforskning. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
22. Norrbin, C. (2007). Svensk genusforskning i världen. En bibliometrisk studie av svenska genusforskares internationella publiceringar [Swedish gender research in the world. A bibliometric study of Swedish gender researchers’ international publications]. Göteborg: Nationella sekretariatet för genusforskning, Göteborgs universitet.
23. Pavlidou, T.-S. (2011). Open forum: The challenge of interdisciplinarity: From theoretical claims to interdisciplinary practices in sender studies. European Journal of Women’s Studies,18, 310–317.
24. Persson, O. (2006). Bibliometri—aktuella trender [Bibliometry—current trends]. InfoTrend,61, 107–111.
25. Prop. 1994/95:164. Jämställdhet mellan kvinnor och män inom utbildningsområdet [Equality between women and men within the education area]. http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/108. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
26. Prop. 2004/05:80. Forskning för ett bättre liv [Research for a better life]. http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/108. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
27. Prop. 2006/07:1. Budgetpropositionen för 2007. Utgiftsområde 16: Utbildning och universitetsforskning [Budget Bill of 2007. Expense area 16: Education and university research]. http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/108. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
28. Samuelsson, J. (2008). På väg från ingenstans. Kritik och emancipation av kunskapsorganisation för feministisk forskning [Going from nowhere. Critique and emancipation of knowledge organisation for feminist research]. (Doctoral thesis, Akademiska avhandlingar vid Sociologiska institutionen, 53). Umeå: Umeå universitet.
29. Sivertsen, G. (2007). Många poänger med norsk bibliometry [Many points with Norwegian bibliometry]. Forska, 2.
30. SOU 2004:115. Den könade förskolan. Om betydelsen av jämställdhet och genus i förskolans pedagogiska arbete [The gendered preschool. Of the importance of equality and gender in the pedagogical work of the preschool]. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
31. SOU 2006:75. Jämställdhet i förskolan. Om betydelsen av jämställdhet och genus i förskolans pedagogiska arbete [Equality in the preschool. Of the importance of equality and gender in the pedagogical work of the preschool]. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
32. SOU U2009:01. Utvärdering av kvantitativa rekryteringsmål för högskolans personal [Evaluation of quantitative recruitment goals for university staff]. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
33. SOU 2011:1. Svart på vitt.Om jämställdhet i akademin [In black and white. Equality in academia]. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
34. Statistics Sweden. (2012). Women and men in Sweden. Stockholm: Gender Statistics Unit, Statistics Sweden.
35. Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. (2007). Utvärdering av ämnet genusvetenskap vid svenska universitet och högskolor [Evaluation of the gender studies at Swedish universities]. (Report 2007:17 R.) Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education.
36. Swedish Research Council. (2011). Evaluation of “Centres of Gender Excellence” (5:2011). Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
37. Swedish Research Council’s Committee for Gender Research. (2005). Genusforskning i korta drag [Gender research in brief]. Retrieved 2014-04-25, from https://www.vr.se/download/18.320a86de108dcd98cbc8000516/Genusforskning+i+korta+drag.pdf
38. Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research, University of Gothenburg. (2004). Genuskommittén vill skapa aha-upplevelser [The Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research wants to create aha-experiences]. http://www.genus.se/Aktuellt/Nyheter/fulltext//genuskommitt-n-vill-skapa-aha-upplevelser.cid1209376. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
39. Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research, University of Gothenburg. (2014). Om oss [About us]. http://www.genus.se/om-oss/. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
40. Thomson Reuters. (2014). Web of Science.http://thomsonreuters.com/products/ip-science/04_062/wos-next-gen-brochure.pdf. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
41. Thurén, B.-M. (Ed.). (2002). Genusvägar. En antologi om genusforskning [Gender ways. An anthology of gender research]. Malmö: Liber.
42. United Nations Development Programme. (2000–2014). Human development reports.http://hdr.undp.org/en/global-reports. Retrieved 24 Sep 2014.
43. Wide, J. (2007). Jämställdhetscertifiering vid Umeå universitet. Vad, hur och varför? [Equality certification at Umeå University. What, how and why?] (2007:01). Umeå: Jämställdhetsrådet, Umeå University.
44. Yip, C. W. M., Wold, I. M., Pedersen, T. & Jahr, R. A. D. (2006). Internasjonalisering—‘Just doing it’. En undersøkelse om hvilke utfordringer kjønnsforskere ser i internasjonalisering [Internationalization—‘Just doing it’. An investigation of what challenges gender researchers see in internationalization]. Oslo: Oslo University.