Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 2540-2548

  Munneke, Jaap ^a   Hoppenbrouwers, Sylco S ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Selective attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84947130105     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 7. doi:10.1167/13.3.7
2. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10367–10371. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108
3. Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
4. Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is top-down about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 326–341. doi:10.3758/APP.72.2.326
5. Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). No capture outside the attentional window. Vision Research, 50, 2543–2550. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.023
6. Belopolsky, A. V., Zwaan, L., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 934–938. doi:10.3758/BF03194124
7. Berger, A., & Henik, A. (2000). The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal–temporal asymmetric. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 421–428. doi:10.1162/089892900562246
8. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
9. Bucker, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 635–646. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0278-7
10. Chica, A. B., Botta, F., Lupiáñez, J., & Bartolomeo, P. (2012). Spatial attention and conscious perception: Interactions and dissociations between and within endogenous and exogenous processes. Neuropsychologia, 50, 621–629. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.020
11. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science, 17, 222–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x
12. Failing, M. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision, 14(5), 6. doi:10.1167/14.5.6
13. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (2006). Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 14, 445–465. doi:10.1080/13506280500193545
14. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
15. Grubb, M. A., White, A. L., Heeger, D. J., & Carrasco, M. (2015). Interactions between voluntary and involuntary attention modulate the quality and temporal dynamics of visual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 437–444. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0698-y
16. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
17. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Reward has a residual impact on target selection in visual search, but not on the suppression of distractors. Journal of Vision, 19(1), 117–128. doi:10.1080/13506285.2010.503946
18. Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T. (2015). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 158–171. doi:10.1037/xge0000037
19. Müller, H. J., & Rabbit, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315
20. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
21. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
22. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
23. Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition & Emotion, 29, 687–694. doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.924484
24. Stankevich, B., & Geng, J. (2014). Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2315–2325. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0720-5
25. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90. doi:10.3758/BF03211619
26. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606. doi:10.3758/BF03211656
27. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
28. Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2007). The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1335–1351. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1335
29. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
30. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
31. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrubt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121–134. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.121
32. Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. (2010). Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. Journal of Vision, 10(10), 16. doi:10.1167/10.10.16