Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies

Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases

Volumn 108, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 563-575

  Roule, Vincent ^a   Lemaitre, Adrien ^a   Sabatier, Rémi ^a   Lognoné, Thérèse ^a   Dahdouh, Ziad ^a   Berger, Ludovic ^a   Milliez, Paul ^a   Grollier, Gilles ^a   Montalescot, Gilles ^b   Beygui, Farzin ^a,b  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Cardiogenic shock; Death; Major bleeding; Transradial access; Vascular access

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLEEDING; CARDIAC PATIENT; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CAUSE OF DEATH; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ARREST; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CATHETERIZATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMORRHAGE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ODDS RATIO; PROCEDURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ODDS RATIO; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84947018205     PISSN: 18752136     EISSN: 18752128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, et al. Improved outcome ofcardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction:a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI Frenchnationwide registries. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2535-43.
2. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, Gurwitz J, Bigelow C,Gore JM. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicatingacute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1162-8.
3. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revasculariza-tion in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenicshock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascular-ize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med1999;341:625-34.
4. Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, et al. ST-segment elevation myocar-dial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in amulticenter randomized clinical trial: the ST-elevation MI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:964-72.
5. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versusfemoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syn-dromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol2012;60:2490-9.
6. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. Radial ver-sus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevationacute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial versusFemoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coro-nary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2481-9.
7. Karrowni W, Vyas A, Giacomino B, et al. Radial versusfemoral access for primary percutaneous interventions inST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC CardiovascInterv 2013;6:814-23.
8. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the man-agement of acute myocardial infarction in patients presentingwith ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2569-619.
9. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, et al. Consensus docu-ment on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascularinterventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groupson Acute Cardiac Care∗∗and Thrombosis of the European Soci-ety of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 2013;8:1242-51.
10. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hos-pital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events.Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2345-53.
11. Subherwal S, Bach RG, Chen AY, et al. Baseline risk of majorbleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction:the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable anginapatients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementa-tion of the ACC/AHA guidelines) Bleeding Score. Circulation2009;119:1873-82.
12. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding def-initions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus reportfrom the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation2011;123:2736-47.
13. Bernat I, Abdelaal E, Plourde G, et al. Early and late out-comes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention byradial or femoral approach in patients presenting in acuteST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. AmHeart J 2013;165:338-43.
14. Fujii T, Masuda N, Ijichi T, et al. Transradial interventionfor patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction withor without cardiogenic shock. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2013;83:E1-7.
15. Iga A, Wagatsuma K, Yamazaki J, Ikeda T. Transradial ver-sus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardialinfarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transra-dial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI inhigh-risk acute myocardial infarction? J Invasive Cardiol2014;26:196-202.
16. Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Ratib K, et al. Arterial access siteutilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radialaccess feasible? Am Heart J 2014;167:900-80.
17. Rodriguez-Leor O, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Carrillo X, et al.Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardio-genic shock: a single-center experience. Am Heart J2013;165:280-5.
18. Gellen B, Lesault PF, Canoui-Poitrine F, et al. Feasibility limitsof transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention inacute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI). Int J Cardiol 2013;168:1056-61.
19. Abdelaal E, Brousseau-Provencher C, Montminy S, et al. Riskscore, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradialapproach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Car-diovasc Interv 2013;6:1129-37.
20. Zeymer U, Vogt A, Zahn R, et al. Predictors of in-hospitalmortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarctioncomplicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary per-cutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); results of the primaryPCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologis-che Krankenhausarzte (ALKK). Eur Heart J 2004;25:322-8.
21. Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, et al. Radial versus femoralapproach comparison in percutaneous coronary interventionwith intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UPregistry. Am Heart J 2013;166:1019-26.
22. Boden H, Velders MA, van der Hoeven BL, Cannegieter SC, Schalij MJ. In-hospital major bleeding and its clinical relevancein patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treatedwith primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol2013;112:1533-9.
23. Moscucci M, Fox KA, Cannon CP, et al. Predictors of majorbleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry ofAcute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J 2003;24:1815-23.
24. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access forcoronary angiography and intervention in patients with acutecoronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group,multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409-20.
25. Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. Thetransradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention:historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions.J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2187-95.
26. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of thearterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mor-tality: the M.O.R.T.A.L. study (Mortality benefit Of ReducedTransfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via theArm or Leg). Heart 2008;94:1019-25.
27. Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, et al. Comparison of tran-sradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiographyand angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1177-80.
28. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon sup-port for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287-96.
29. Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, et al. Effect of radial versusfemoral access on radiation dose and the importance of proce-dural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVALtrial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:258-66.
30. Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu-Fadel MS, et al. Real-time ultra-sound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (RadialArtery access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv2015;8:283-91.