Dissecting quantitative trait variation in the resequencing era: Complementarity of bi-parental, multi-parental and association panels

Plant Science

Volumn 242, Issue , 2016, Pages 120-130

  Pascual, Laura ^a,d   Albert, Elise ^a   Sauvage, Christopher ^a   Duangjit, Janejira ^a,e   Bouchet, Jean Paul ^a   Bitton, Frédérique ^a   Desplat, Nelly ^a,f   Brunel, Dominique ^b   Le Paslier, Marie Christine ^b   Ranc, Nicolas ^a,g   Bruguier, Laure ^c   Chauchard, Betty ^c   Verschave, Philippe ^c   Causse, Mathilde ^a  

^a Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^b CENTRE NATIONAL DE GÉNOTYPAGE   (France)

^c Centre de Recherche de La Costière ^*  (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^e KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^f INSTITUT BERGONIÉ   (France)

^g Syngenta Seeds SAS   (France)

Author keywords

Fruit quality; Genome wide association; QTL mapping; Resequencing; Tomato

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; CROSS BREEDING; DNA SEQUENCE; FOUNDER EFFECT; FRUIT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; POPULATION GENETICS; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TOMATO;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; FOUNDER EFFECT; FRUIT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84947016925     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: 18732259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Paterson A.H., Lander E.S., Hewitt J.D., Peterson S., Lincoln S.E., Tanksley S.D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 1988, 335:721-726.
2. Kearsey M.J., Farquhar A.G.L. QTL analysis in plants; where are we now?. Heredity (Edinb.) 1998, 80:137-142.
3. Holland J.B. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:156-161.
4. Lippman Z.B., Semel Y., Zamir D. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17:545-552.
5. Price A. Believe it or not, QTLs are accurate!. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:213-216.
6. Korte A., Farlow A. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 2013, 9:29.
7. Gupta P.K., Rustgi S., Kulwal P.L. Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: present status and future prospects. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57:461-485.
8. Visscher P.M., Brown M.A., McCarthy M.I., Yang J. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90:7-24.
9. Price A.L., Zaitlen N.A., Reich D., Patterson N. New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:459-463.
10. Baxter I., Brazelton J.N., Yu D., Huang Y.S., Lahner B., Yakubova E., et al. A coastal cline in sodium accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana is driven by natural variation of the sodium transporter AtHKT1;1. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001193.
11. Yu J., Holland J.B., McMullen M.D., Buckler E.S. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 2008, 178:539-551.
12. Kover P.X., Valdar W., Trakalo J., Scarcelli N., Ehrenreich I.M., Purugganan M.D., et al. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000551.
13. Bandillo N., Raghavan C., Muyco P.A., Sevilla M.A.L., Lobina I.T., Dilla-Ermita C.J., et al. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice (N.Y.) 2013, 6:11.
14. Huang B.E., George A.W., Forrest K.L., Kilian A., Hayden M.J., Morell M.K., et al. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross population for genetic analysis in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10:826-839.
15. Sannemann W., Huang B.E., Mathew B., Léon J. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross in barley: high-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping for flowering time as a proof of concept. Mol. Breed. 2015, 35. 10.1007/s11032-015-0284-7.
16. Pascual L., Desplat N., Huang B.E., Desgroux A., Bruguier L., Bouchet J.-P., et al. Potential of a tomato MAGIC population to decipher the genetic control of quantitative traits and detect causal variants in the resequencing era. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 10.1111/pbi.12282.
17. Cavanagh C., Morell M., Mackay I., Powell W. From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:215-221.
18. Bardol N., Ventelon M., Mangin B., Jasson S., Loywick V., Couton F., et al. Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium QTL mapping in multiple families of maize (Zea mays L.) line crosses highlights complementarities between models based on parental haplotype and single locus polymorphism. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:2717-2736.
19. Klasen J.R., Piepho H.-P., Stich B. QTL detection power of multi-parental RIL populations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity (Edinb.) 2012, 108:626-632.
20. Causse M., Desplat N., Pascual L., Le Paslier M.-C., Sauvage C., Bauchet G., et al. Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:791.
21. Giovannoni J.J. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 2004, 16:170-180.
22. Saliba-Colombani V., Causse M., Gervais L., Philouze J. Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome. Genome 2000, 43:29-40.
23. Labate JA L.M., Grandillo S., Fulton T., Muños S., Caicedo A.L., Peralta I., Ji Y., Chetelat R.T., Scott J.W., Gonzalo M.J., Francis D., Yang W., van der Knaap E., Baldo A.M., Smith-White B., Eller M.C., Prince J.P., Blanchard N.E., Storey D.B., Stevens M.R., Robbins M.D., Fen Wang J., Liedl B.E., O'Connell M.A., Stommel J.R., Aoki K., Iijima Y., Slade A.J., Hurst S.R., Loeffler D., Steine M.N., Vafeados D., McGuire C., Freeman C., Amen A., Goodstal J., Facciotti D., Van Eck J. Labate_et_al_2007.pdf. Genome Mapp. Mol. Breed. Plants 2007, vol. 5:11-135. Veg., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
24. Frary A., Nesbitt T.C., Grandillo S., van der Knaap E., Cong B., Liu J.P., et al. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 2000, 289:85-88.
25. Fridman E., Pleban T., Zamir D. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484bp within an invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:4718-4723.
26. Tomato-Genome-Consortium The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485:635-641.
27. Aflitos S., Schijlen E., de Jong H. Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing. Plant J. 2014, 80:136-148.
28. Lin T., Zhu G., Zhang J., Xu X., Yu Q., Zheng Z., et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 2014, 10.1038/ng.3117.
29. Bolger A., Scossa F., Bolger M.E., Lanz C., Maumus F., Tohge T., et al. The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46:1034-1038.
30. Sim S.C., Durstewitz G., Plieske J., Wieseke R., Ganal M.W., Van Deynze A., et al. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e40563.
31. Sim S.-C., Van Deynze A., Stoffel K., Douches D.S., Zarka D., Ganal M.W., et al. High-density SNP genotyping of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reveals patterns of genetic variation due to breeding. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e45520.
32. Sauvage C., Segura V., Bauchet G., Stevens R., Do P.T., Nikoloski Z., et al. Genome-wide association in tomato reveals 44 candidate loci for fruit metabolic traits. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165:1120-1132.
33. Chakrabarti M., Zhang N., Sauvage C., Muños S., Blanca J., Cañizares J., et al. A cytochrome P450 regulates a domestication trait in cultivated tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:17125-17130.
34. Saliba-Colombani V., Causse M., Langlois D., Philouze J., Buret M. Genetic analysis of organoleptic quality in fresh market tomato. 1. Mapping QTLs for physical and chemical traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102:259-272.
35. ® 4, Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations 2006, Kyazma B.V., Wageningen, Netherlands.
36. Lander E., Botstein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using Rflp linkage maps. Genetics 1989, 121:185-199.
37. Broman K.W., Wu H., Sen S., Churchill G.A. R/qtl. QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:889-890.
38. Huang B.E., George A.W. R/mpMap: a computational platform for the genetic analysis of multiparent recombinant inbred lines. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:727-729.
39. Xu J., Ranc N., Muños S., Rolland S., Bouchet J.P., Desplat N., et al. Phenotypic diversity and association mapping for fruit quality traits in cultivated tomato and related species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:567-581.
40. Sim S.-C., Durstewitz G., Plieske J., Wieseke R., Ganal M.W., Van Deynze A., et al. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e40563.
41. Hardy O.J., Vekemans X. SPAGeDI. A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2002, 2:618-620.
42. Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003, 164:1567-1587.
43. Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:2611-2620.
44. Segura V., Vilhjálmsson B.J., Platt A., Korte A., Seren Ü., Long Q., et al. An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:825-830.
45. Steinbach D., Alaux M., Amselem J., Choisne N., Durand S., Flores R., et al. GnpIS: an information system to integrate genetic and genomic data from plants and fungi. Database (Oxford) 2013, 2013:bat058.
46. Manning K., Tör M., Poole M., Hong Y., Thompson A.J., King G.J., et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:948-952.
47. Mangin B., Siberchicot A., Nicolas S., Doligez A., This P., Cierco-Ayrolles C. Novel measures of linkage disequilibrium that correct the bias due to population structure and relatedness. Heredity (Edinb.) 2012, 108:285-291.
48. Huang Z., van der Knaap E. Tomato fruit weight 11.3 maps close to fasciated on the bottom of chromosome 11. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123:465-474.
49. Lecomte L., Saliba-Colombani V., Gautier A., Gomez-Jimenez M.C., Duffe P., Buret M., et al. Fine mapping of QTLs of chromosome 2 affecting the fruit architecture and composition of tomato. Mol. Breed. 2004, 13:1-14.
50. Huang Y.-F., Madur D., Combes V., Ky C.L., Coubriche D., Jamin P., et al. The genetic architecture of grain yield and related traits in Zea maize L. revealed by comparing intermated and conventional populations. Genetics 2010, 186:395-404.
51. Davey J.W., Hohenlohe P.A., Etter P.D., Boone J.Q., Catchen J.M., Blaxter M.L. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:499-510.
52. van Dijk E.L., Auger H., Jaszczyszyn Y., Thermes C. Ten years of next-generation sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 2014, 30:418-426.
53. Pai A.A., Pritchard J.K., Gilad Y. The genetic and mechanistic basis for variation in gene regulation. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11:e1004857.
54. McCarthy M.I., Hirschhorn J.N. Genome-wide association studies: potential next steps on a genetic journey. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008, 17:157-165.
55. Bochdanovits Z., Simon-Sanchez J., Jonker M., Hoogendijk W.J., van der Vaart A., Heutink P. Accurate prediction of a minimal region around a genetic association signal that contains the causal variant. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 22:238-242.
56. Rincent R., Moreau L., Monod H., Kuhn E., Melchinger A.E., Malvar R.A., et al. Recovering power in association mapping panels with variable levels of linkage disequilibrium. Genetics 2014, 197:375-387.
57. Cormier F., Le Gouis J., Dubreuil P., Lafarge S., Praud S. A genome-wide identification of chromosomal regions determining nitrogen use efficiency components in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:2679-2693.
58. Rincent R., Laloë D., Nicolas S., Altmann T., Brunel D., Revilla P., et al. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.). Genetics 2012, 192:715-728.
59. Robbins M.D., Sim S.C., Yang W., Van Deynze A., van der Knaap E., Joobeur T., et al. Mapping and linkage disequilibrium analysis with a genome-wide collection of SNPs that detect polymorphism in cultivated tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:1831-1845.
60. Ross-Ibarra J., Morrell P.L., Gaut B.S. Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104(Suppl.):8641-8648.
61. Lorenz A.J., Hamblin M.T., Jannink J.-L. Performance of single nucleotide polymorphisms versus haplotypes for genome-wide association analysis in barley. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e14079.
62. Gawenda I., Thorwarth P., Günther T., Ordon F., Schmid K.J. Genome-wide association studies in elite varieties of German winter barley using single-marker and haplotype-based methods. Plant Breed. 2015, 134:28-39.
63. Brachi B., Faure N., Horton M., Flahauw E., Vazquez A., Nordborg M., et al. Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000940.
64. Mitchell-Olds T. The molecular basis of quantitative genetic variation in natural populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10:324-328.
65. Stinchcombe J.R., Hoekstra H.E. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits. Heredity (Edinb.) 2008, 100(Suppl.):158-170.
66. Mitchell-Olds T. Complex-trait analysis in plants. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:113.
67. Atwell S., Huang Y.S., Vilhjálmsson B.J., Willems G., Horton M., Li Y., et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010, 465:627-631.
68. Pagny G., Paulstephenraj P.S., Poque S., Sicard O., Cosson P., Eyquard J.-P., et al. Family-based linkage and association mapping reveals novel genes affecting Plum pox virus infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2012, 196:873-886.
69. Poland J.A., Rife T.W. Genotyping-by-sequencing for plant breeding and genetics. Plant Genome J. 2012, 5:92-102.
70. Austin R.S., Vidaurre D., Stamatiou G., Breit R., Provart N.J., Bonetta D., et al. Next-generation mapping of Arabidopsis genes. Plant J. 2011, 67:715-725.
71. Candela H., Casanova-Sáez R., Micol J.L. Getting started in mapping-by-sequencing. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 10.1111/jipb.12305.
72. Sosnowski O., Charcosset A., Joets J. Biomercator V3: an upgrade of genetic map compilation and quantitative trait loci meta-analysis algorithms. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:2082-2083.
73. Khowaja F.S., Norton G.J., Courtois B., Price A.H. Improved resolution in the position of drought-related QTLs in a single mapping population of rice by meta-analysis. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:276.
74. Zamir D. Where have all the crop phenotypes gone?. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001595.
75. Bombarely A., Menda N., Tecle I.Y., Buels R.M., Strickler S., Fischer-York T., et al. The sol genomics network (solgenomics.net): growing tomatoes using Perl. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D1149-D1155.
76. Martin L.B.B., Fei Z., Giovannoni J.J., Rose J.K.C. Catalyzing plant science research with RNA-seq. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4:66.
77. Hansen B.G., Halkier B.A., Kliebenstein D.J. Identifying the molecular basis of QTLs: eQTLs add a new dimension. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:72-77.
78. Palmgren M.G., Edenbrandt A.K., Vedel S.E., Andersen M.M., Landes X., Østerberg J.T., et al. Are we ready for back-to-nature crop breeding?. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 20:155-164.
79. Piron F., Nicolai M., Minoia S., Piednoir E., Moretti A., Salgues A., et al. An induced mutation in tomato eIF4E leads to immunity to two potyviruses. PLoS ONE 2010, 5.
80. Mauricio R. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: uses and caveats for evolutionary biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2:370-381.
81. Zhong S., Fei Z., Chen Y.-R., Zheng Y., Huang M., Vrebalov J., et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:154-159.