The erosion of patron-client bonds and social change in rural southeast asia

The Journal of Asian Studies

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1972, Pages 5-37

  Scott, James C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946988922     PISSN: 00219118     EISSN: 17520401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2053176     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Lande, Leaders, Factions, and Parties: The Structure of Philippine Politics (New Haven: Yale Southeast Asia Studies, 1964).
2. “Groups and Networks in Southeast Asia,” delivered to the Southeast Asia Development Advisory Group, New York, November, 1969, and American Political Science Review (forthcoming).
3. Manning Nash, The Golden Road to Modernity (New York: Wiley, 1965), passim.
4. M. G. Swift, Malay Peasant Society in Jelebu (London: Athlone Press, 1965).
5. Herbert Phillips, Thai Peasant Personality (Berkeley: Univ. of California, 1965).
6. Robert R. Jay, Religion and Politics in Rural Central Java, Cultural Report Series (New Haven: Yale University-Southeast Asian Studies, 1963), pp. 98-99.
7. Donald Hindley, The Communist Party of Indonesia 1951-1963 (Berkeley: Univ. of California, 1966), Ch. 14.
8. Rex Mortimer, “Class, Social Cleavage, and Indonesian Communism,” Indonesia, #8 (October, 1969), pp. 1-20.
9. W. F. Wertheim, “From Aliran to Class Struggle in the Countryside of Java,” Paper No. 55, International Conference on Asian History, August 5-10, 1968.
10. George M. Foster, “The Dyadic Contract in Tzintzuntzan: Patron-Client Relationship,” American Anthropologist, 65 (1963), pp. 1280-1294.
11. Eric Wolf, “Kinship, Friendship and Patron-Client Relations,” in M. Banton, ed., The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies (New York: Praeger, 1966).
12. J. Campbell, Honour, Family, and Patronage(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964);.
13. John Duncan Powell, “Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics,” American Political Science Review, LXIV, 2 (June, 1970).
14. Carl Lande, Leaders, Factions and Parties: The Structure of Philippine Politics.
15. Alex Weingrod, “Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 19 (July, 1968), pp. 1142-1158.
16. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia,” American Political Science Review, 66: 1 (March, 1972), pp. 91-113.
17. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966), pp. 453-483.
18. “‘Exploitation’ in Rural Central Italy: Structure and Ideology in Stratification Study,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 12 (1970), pp. 327-339.
19. Exchange and Power in Social Life (New York: Wiley, 1964).
20. “Agricultural Enterprise and Rural Class Relations,” American Journal of Sociology, 67 (1961-62).
21. The Making of the English Workjng Class (New York: Vintage, 1966), p. 203.
22. James Scott and Benedict Kerkvlict, “How Traditional Rural Patrons Lose Legitimacy: A Theory With Special Reference to Lowland Southeast Asia,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, (forthcoming 1973).
23. E. J. Hobsbawn and George Rudé, Captain Swing (New York: Pantheon, 1968).
24. Robert von Heine-Geldern, Conceptions of State and Kingship in Southeast Asia (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program, 1956).
25. George Coedes, The Indianized States of Southeast Asia (Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1964).
26. Akin Rabibhadana, The Organization of Thai Society in the Early Bangkok Period, 1782-1873 (Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1969).
27. H. G. Quaritch-Wales, Ancient Siamese Government and Administration (London: Bernard Quaritch, 1934).
28. E. R. Leach, Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure (Boston: Beacon Press, 1965).
29. Weingrod, Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure, p. 388.
30. Aiden Southall, ed., Social Change in Modern Africa, p. 32.
31. F. K. Lehman, The Structure of Chin Society: A Tribal People of Burma Adapted to a Non-Western Civilization, Illinois Studies in Anthropology, N. 3 (Champaign-Urbaha; University of Illinois Press, 1963), p. 49.
32. Jay. The Structure of Chin Society: A Tribal People of Burma Adapted to a Non-Western Civilization, p. 39.
33. George M. Foster, “Peasant Society and the Image of Limited Good,” American Anthropologist, 67, 2 (April, 1965).
34. Godfrey and Monica Wilson, The Analysis of Social Change: Based on Observations in Central Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1945), pp. 28, 40.
35. Joseph Schumpeter, Social Classes in an Ethnically Homogeneous Society (New York: Meridian, 1955), pp. 101-168.
36. David Maar, Vietnam's Anti-Colonial Movements: The Early Years 1885-1925 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), Ch. 8.
37. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia,” American Political Science Review 66:1 (March, 1972), pp. 91-113.
38. Sartono Kartodirdjo, “The Peasants' Revolt of Banten in 1888 ('s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966), Ch. 3.
39. Harry J. Benda, “The Structure of Southeast Asian History: Some Preliminary Observations,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, 3:1 (March, 1962), p. 126.
40. W. F. Wertheim, Indonesian Society in Transition (The Haque: W. van Hoeve, 1959), p. 81.
41. Karl Polanyi in The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).
42. Robert L. Sansom, The Economics of Insurgency in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam (Cambridge, Mass.: M. I. T. Press, 1970), p. 33.
43. Colin Clark and Margaret Haswell, The Economics of Subsistence Agriculture (London: St. Martins Press, 1964), pp. 99-100.
44. Ngô Vinh Lông, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945 (Mss, 1969), pp. 82-95.
45. Sansom, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, pp. 37-39.
46. Furnivall, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, pp. 103, 192-193.
47. Robert L. Sansom, The Economics of insurgency in the Me Sansom, p. 199.
48. Akira Takahashi, Land and Peasants in Central Luzon (Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1969), P. 137.
49. Jorge Piron, “Land Tenure and Level of Living in Central Luzon,” Philippine Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3 (September, 1956), p. 393.
50. Ngô Vinh Long, Philippine Studies, pp. 57-61.
51. J. H. Anderson, “Some Aspects of Land and Society in a Pangasinan Community,” Philippine Sociological Review, Vol. 10, Nos. 1 and 2 (January-April, 1962), p. 58.
52. Pierre Gourou, The Peasants of the Tonkin Delta, translated by the Human Relations Area Files (New Haven: HRAF Press, 1955), p. 357.
53. Hobsbawm and Rudé, The Peasants of the Tonkin Delta, Ch. 2.
54. Thompson, The Peasants of the Tonkin Delta, Ch. 7.
55. H. ten Dam, “Cooperation and Social Structure in the Village of Chibodas,” in Vol. 6, Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Policy of Selected Studies of Indonesia by Dutch Scholars (The Hague: W. van Hoeve, 1961) p. 366.
56. Jean Goudal, Labour Conditions in IndoChina (Geneva: I. L. O., 1938), p. 193.
57. Sansom, Labour Conditions in IndoChina, p. 28.
58. E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class, p. 216.
59. Harry J. Benda and Lance Castles, “The Samin Movement,” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenktinde, Vol. 125, Part 2 (1969).
60. “The Samin and Samat Movements: Two Examples of Peasant Resistance,” Revue du Sud-Est Asiatique, 67, no. 2, pp. 304-310.
61. Report of the Land and Agriculture Committee, Government of British Burma (Rangoon, 1938), II, p. 51.
62. Jay, Report of the Land and Agriculture Committee, p. 34.
63. Ben J. Kerkvliet, “Peasant Society and Unrest Prior to the Huk Revolution in the Philippines,” Asian Studies (Manila, 1972), pp. 3-8.
64. John A. Larkin, The Evolution of Pampanga Society (PhD dissertation, N.Y.U., 1966), pp. 126-128.
65. The Pampangans, (Berkeley: University of California Press. 1972).
66. Kerkvliet, The Pampangans, p. 6.
67. J. N. Anderson, “Some Aspects of Land and Society in a Pangasinan Community,” Philippine Sociological Review, 10:1 and 2 (January-April, 1962), p. 56.
68. Akira Takahashi, Land and Peasants in Central Luzon, pp. 117-118.
69. Robert T. McMillan, “Land Tenure in the Philippines,” Rural Sociology, 20:1 (1955), p. 27.
70. H. ten Dam, “Cooperation and Social Structure in the Village of Chibodas,” in Vol. 6, Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Policy, of Selected Studies of Indonesia by Dutch Scholars (The Hague: W. van Hoeve, 1961), p. 367.
71. Larkin, Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Policy, P. 173.
72. Stinchcombe, Indonesian Economics: The Concept of Dualism in Theory and Policy, p. 186.
73. Robert L. Sansom, The Economics of ln-stirgency in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1970), Ch. 2, pp. 18-56.
74. Ngô Vinh Lông, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, Mss, 1969, p. 10.
75. Sansom, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, pp. 35-37.
76. Eric Hobsbawm and George Rudé, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, Introduction. Sansom, The Economics of Insurgency, pp. 60-61.
77. Stinchcombe, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, p. 187.
78. Takahashi, The Colonial Peasants of VietNam, 1900-1945, p. 77.