Reviewing peer review at the NIH

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 373, Issue 20, 2015, Pages 1893-1895

  Lauer, Michael S ^a   Nakamura, Richard ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNDING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; BIBLIOMETRICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84946887733     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1507427     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Ioannidis JP, Khoury MJ. Assessing value in biomedical research: the PQRST of appraisal and reward. JAMA 2014;312:483-4.
2. Lauer MS, Danthi NS, Kaltman JR, Wu CO. Predicting productivity returns on investment: thirty years of peer review, grant funding, and publication of highly cited papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circ Res 2015;117:239-43.
3. Li D, Agha L. Research funding: big names or big ideas: do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? Science 2015;348: 434-8.
4. Wang D, Song C, Barabási A-L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 2013; 342:127-32.
5. Lindner MD, Nakamura RK. Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores. PLoS One 2015;10(6):e0126938.