Genetic vs environmental factors that correlate with rosacea: A cohort-based survey of twins

JAMA Dermatology

Volumn 151, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1213-1219

  Aldrich, Nely ^a   Gerstenblith, Meg ^a   Fu, Pingfu ^a   Tuttle, Marie S ^a   Varma, Priya ^a   Gotow, Erica ^a   Cooper, Kevin D ^a   Mann, Margaret ^a   Popkin, Daniel L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; NATIONAL ROSACEA SOCIETY GRADING SYSTEM; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; ROSACEA; SKIN CANCER; SKIN DISEASE ASSESSMENT; SMOKING HABIT; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGE; AGED; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; TWINS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALCOHOL DRINKING; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASES IN TWINS; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; ROSACEA; SMOKING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84946821633     PISSN: 21686068     EISSN: 21686084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2230     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chosidow O, Cribier B. Epidemiology of rosacea: updated data. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2011;138 (suppl 3):S179-S183.
2. Abram K, Silm H, Maaroos H-I, Oona M. Risk factors associated with rosacea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(5):565-571.
3. SteinhoffM, Schauber J, Leyden JJ. New insights into rosacea pathophysiology: a review of recent findings. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2013;69(6)(suppl 1): S15-S26.
4. Bataille V, Snieder H, MacGregor AJ, Sasieni P, Spector TD. The influence of genetics and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of acne: a twin study of acne in women. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119(6):1317-1322.
5. Bataille V, Lens M, Spector TD. The use of the twin model to investigate the genetics and epigenetics of skin diseases with genomic, transcriptomic and methylation data. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(9):1067-1073.
6. Palleschi GM, TorchiaD. Rosacea in amonozygotic twin. Australas J Dermatol. 2007;48(2):132-133.
7. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(6):869-871.
8. NationalWeather Service. Climate Prediction Center. Index-annual time series; 2013. http://www .cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/uv -index/uv-annual.shtml. Accessed January 30, 2015.
9. NationalWeather Service. Climate Prediction Center. UV index. 2013. http://www.cpc.ncep .noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/uv-index/uv -information.shtml. Accessed January 30, 2015.
10. Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, et al. Standard classification of rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2002;46(4):584-587.
11. Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M, et al; National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. Standard grading system for rosacea: report of the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. J AmAcad Dermatol. 2004;50(6):907-912.
12. Wilkin J, Dahl M, Detmar M. Grading system for rosacea. Published June 2004. http://www.rosacea .org/grading/gradingsystem.php. Accessed May 27, 2015.
13. Helfrich YR, Maier LE, Cui Y, et al. Clinical, histologic, and molecular analysis of differences between erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and telangiectatic photoaging [published online March 23, 2015]. JAMADermatol. 2015. doi:10.1001 /jamadermatol.2014.4728.
14. Jinks JL, Fulker DW. Comparison of the biometrical genetical,MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Psychol Bull. 1970;73(5):311-349.
15. Diggle PJ, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York, NY: Clarendon Press; 1994:253.
16. D'Agostino RB Jr. Propensity scoremethods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17 (19):2265-2281.
17. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41-55.
18. Parsons LS. Performing a 1:N case-control match on propensity score. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2004:1-11.
19. Neale RE, Carriere P, MurphyMFG, Baade PD. Testicular cancer in twins: ameta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(1):171-173.
20. Gosden RG, Treloar SA, Martin NG, et al. Prevalence of premature ovarian failure in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(2):610-615.