A Qualitative Study of Vulnerable Patient Views of Type 2 Diabetes Consumer Reports

Patient

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 231-240

  Longo, Daniel R ^a   Crabtree, Benjamin F ^b   Pellerano, Maria B ^b   Howard, Jenna ^b   Saver, Barry ^c   Hannan, Edward L ^d   Lee, Justin ^e   Lundberg, Michael T ^f   Sabo, Roy ^g  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^f Virginia Geographic Information Network   (United States)

^g VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC PATIENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HISPANIC; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT REFERRAL; POPULATION GROUP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VULNERABLE POPULATION; ADULT; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; SELF CARE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84946762723     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0146-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2013 national healthcare quality report. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqr13/index.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2014.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems. https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Public reports on provider performance for consumers. http://www.ahrq.gov/path/publicreporting.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Quality indicators. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/. Accessed 7 Jan 2012.
5. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 2010. H.R. 3590, 111th Congress of the United States of America.
6. Ketelaar NA, Faber MJ, Flottorp S, Rygh LH, Deane KH, Eccles MP. Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11:CD004538.
7. Berger ZD, Joy SM, Hutfless S, Bridges JF. Can public reporting impact patient outcomes and disparities? A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:480–7.
8. Fung CH, Lim Y, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:111–23.
9. Hannan EL, Cozzens K, King SB 3rd, Walford G, Shah NR. The New York state cardiac registries: history, contributions, limitations and lessons for future efforts to assess and publicly report health care outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2309–16.
10. Anonymous. Public reporting as a quality improvement strategy: a systematic review of the multiple pathways public reporting may influence quality of health care. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/343/763/CQG-Public-Reporting_Protocol_20110817.pdf Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
11. Elixhauser A, Parker J, Pine M, Andrews R. Improving administrative data for public reporting. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Annual Conference: Promoting Quality. Partnering for Change, Bethesda, 9 September 2008.
12. Bardach NS, Hibbard JH, Dudley RA. Users of public reports of hospital quality: who, what, why and how? An aggregate analysis of 16 online public reporting web sites and users’ and experts’ suggestions for improvement. http://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/value/pubreportusers/index.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
13. Schauffler H, Mordavsky J. Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference? Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:69–89.
14. Dorsey CJ, Murdaugh CL. The theory of self-care management for vulnerable populations. J Theor Constr Test. 2003;7:43–9.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States; 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2012.
16. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. London: SAGE; 2009.
17. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.
18. Addison RB. A grounded hermeneutic editing approach. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 145–61.
19. Totten AM, Wagner J, Tiwari A, O’Haire C, Griffin J, Walker M. Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 5: Public reporting as a quality improvement strategy). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012;(208.5):1–645.
20. Kolstad JE, Chernew ME. Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services. Med Care Res Rev. 2009;66(1 Suppl):28S.
21. Longo DR, Woolf SH. Rethinking the information priorities of patients. JAMA. 2014;311:1857–8.
22. Hibbard JH, Greene J, Daniel D. What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67:275–93.
23. Halbert CH, Armstrong K, Gandy OH Jr, Shaker L. Racial differences in trust in health care providers. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:896–901.
24. Hispanic health in the United States. Council on scientific affairs. JAMA. 1991;265:248–52.
25. Brandon DT, Isaac LA, LaVeist TA. The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care? J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:951–6.
26. Kennedy BR, Mathis CC, Woods AK. African Americans and their distrust of the health care system: healthcare for diverse populations. J Cult Divers. 2007;14:56–60.
27. Lagnado L. When racial sensitivities clash with research. Wall St J (East Ed). 1997;B1:B5.
28. Harris Y, Gorelick PB, Samuels P, Bempong I. Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88:630–4.
29. Scharff DP, Mathews KJ, Jackson P, Hoffsuemmer J, Martin E, Edwards D. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21:879–97.
30. Katz RV, Kegeles SS, Kressin NR, Green BL, James SA, Wang MQ, et al. Awareness of the Tuskegee syphilis study and the US presidential apology and their influence on minority participation in biomedical research. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1137–42.
31. Westergaard RP, Beach MC, Saha S, Jacobs EA. Racial/ethnic differences in trust in health care: HIV conspiracy beliefs and vaccine research participation. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:140–6.
32. Sinaiko AD, Rosenthal MB. The impact of tiered physician networks on patient choices. Health Serv Res. 2014;49:1348–63.
33. Hibbard JH, Peters E, Dixon A, Tusler M. Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn’t just about literacy. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:379–94.