A national survey of pulmonologists' views on low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer

Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1667-1675

  Iaccarino, Jonathan M ^a   Clark, Jack ^b,c   Bolton, Rendelle ^b   Kinsinger, Linda ^d   Kelley, Michael ^d,e   Slatore, Christopher G ^f,g   Au, David H ^h,i   Wiener, Renda Soylemez ^a,b,j  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Center for Health Quality Outcomes and Economic Research   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h VA PUGET SOUND HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^j DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Early detection of cancer; Health care surveys; Lung neoplasms; Physicians

Indexed keywords

CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNG CANCER; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PULMONOLOGIST; REVIEW; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MASS SCREENING; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84946734202     PISSN: 23256621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-467OC     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409.
2. Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E Jr, Colditz GA, Church TR, Ettinger DS, Etzioni R, Flowers CR, Gazelle GS, Kelsey DK, et al. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:107-117.
3. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:330-338.
4. Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH, Field JK, Jett JR, Keshavjee S, MacMahon H, Mulshine JL, Munden RF, Salgia R, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;144:33-38.
5. Detterbeck FC, Mazzone PJ, Naidich DP, Bach PB. Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143:e78S-e92S.
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines)-Lung cancer screening [Internet]. Version 1. 2015 [created 2014 Jul 21; accessed 2015 July 2]. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/pdf/lung-screening.pdf
7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439N). Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [created 2015 Feb 5; accessed 2015 July 2]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=274
8. Wiener RS, Gould MK, Arenberg D, Au DH, Fennig K, Lamb CR, et al. Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Policy Statement: Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Programs with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Clinical Practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:881-891.
9. Rohan EA, Boehm JE, DeGroff A, Glover-Kudon R, Preissle J. Implementing the CDC's colorectal cancer screening demonstration program: wisdom from the field. Cancer 2013; 119:2870-2883.
10. Beckmann MW, Mallmann P; Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO). Interdisciplinary S2k guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2009;135:1197-1206.
11. Corbelli J, Borrero S, Bonnema R, McNamara M, Kraemer K, Rubio D, Karpov I, McNeil M. Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014;23:397-403.
12. Kinsinger LS, Atkins D, Provenzale D, Anderson C, Petzel R. Implementation of a new screening recommendation in health care: the Veterans Health Administration's approach to lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:597-598.
13. McKee BJ, McKee AB, Flacke S, Lamb CR, Hesketh PJ, Wald C. Initial experience with a free, high-volume, low-dose CT lung cancer screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10:586-592.
14. Mazzone P. The rationale for, and design of, a lung cancer screening program. Cleve Clin J Med 2012;79:337-345.
15. Arenberg D, Kazerooni EA. Setting up a lung cancer screening program. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012;10:277-285.
16. Stetler CB, Damschroder LJ, Helfrich CD, Hagedorn HJ. A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci 2011;6:99.
17. Wiener RS, Gould MK, Slatore CG, Fincke BG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Resource use and guideline concordance in evaluation of pulmonary nodules for cancer: too much and too little care. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:871-880.
18. Veeramachaneni NK, Crabtree TD, Kreisel D, Zoole JB, Musick JF, Taylor NG, Krupnick AS, Gierada DS, Patterson GA, Meyers BF. A thoracic surgery clinic dedicated to indeterminate pulmonary nodules: too many scans and too little pathology? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:30-35.
19. Eisenberg RL, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM. Compliance with Fleischner Society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologists. Radiology 2010;255:218-224.
20. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458-1465.
21. Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Doroshenk M, Fedewa S, Saslow D, Brawley OW, Wender R. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65: 30-54.
22. Bach PB, Gould MK. When the average applies to no one: personalized decision making about potential benefits of lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:571-573.
23. KovalchikSA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD, Caporaso NE, Riley TL, Korch M, Silvestri GA, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med 2013;369:245-254.
24. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:137-144.
25. Wiener RS, Wiener DC, Gould MK. Risks of transthoracic needle biopsy: how high? Clin Pulm Med 2013;20:29-35.
26. Slatore CG, Press N, Au DH, Curtis JR, Wiener RS, Ganzini L. What the heck is a "nodule"? A qualitative study of veterans with pulmonary nodules. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013;10:330-335.
27. Wiener RS, Gould MK, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Clark JA. 'The thing is not knowing': patients' perspectives on surveillance of an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. Health Expect 2015;18:355-365.
28. Wiener RS, Gould MK, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Clark JA. What do you mean, a spot?: A qualitative analysis of patients' reactions to discussions with their physicians about pulmonary nodules. Chest 2013;143:672-677.
29. Slatore CG, Sullivan DR, Pappas M, Humphrey LL. Patient-centered outcomes among lung cancer screening recipients with computed tomography: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:927-934.
30. Slatore CG, Golden SE, Ganzini L, Wiener RS, Au DH. Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules: a cohort study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:184-192.
31. Barnett PG, Ananth L, Gould MK; Veterans Affairs Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in the Management of Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (VA SNAP) Cooperative Study Group. Cost and outcomes of patients with solitary pulmonary nodules managed with PET scans. Chest 2010;137:53-59.
32. Villanti AC, Jiang Y, Abrams DB, Pyenson BS. A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions. PLoS One 2013;8:e71379.
33. Black WC, Gareen IF, Soneji SS, Sicks JD, Keeler EB, Aberle DR, Naeim A, Church TR, Silvestri GA, Gorelick J, et al.; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med 2014;371: 1793-1802.
34. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, Byers T, Colditz GA, Gould MK, Jett JR, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 2012;307: 2418-2429.
35. Mazzone P, Powell CA, Arenberg D, Bach P, Detterbeck F, Gould MK, Jaklitsch MT, Jett J, Naidich D, Vachani A, et al. Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Chest 2015;147:295-303.
36. Klabunde CN, Willis GB, Casalino LP. Facilitators and barriers to survey participation by physicians: a call to action for researchers. Eval Health Prof 2013;36:279-295.
37. Dykema J, Stevenson J, Day B, Sellers SL, Bonham VL. Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians. Eval Health Prof 2011;34: 434-447.
38. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000;283:1715-1722.
39. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med 2004;141: 771-780.
40. Converse JM, Presser S. Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences; Issue 63. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1986.