Improving uncertainty evaluation of process models by using pedigree analysis. A case study on CO2 capture with monoethanolamine

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 85, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-15

  van der Spek, Mijndert ^a   Ramirez, Andrea ^a   Faaij, André ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Monoethanolamine; Pedigree analysis; Postcombustion carbon capture; Process modelling; Uncertainty evaluation

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COOLING WATER; DECISION MAKING; ETHANOLAMINES; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PILOT PLANTS;

MONOETHANOLAMINE; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; POST-COMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURES; PROCESS MODELLING; UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84946600321     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. 2 capture from power plants. Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2007, 1(April (1)):37-46. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583606000077 [accessed 28.09.13].
2. 2 capture plants 2012, University of Regina.
3. Ahn H., Luberti M., Liu Z., Brandani S. Process configuration studies of the amine capture process for coal-fired power plants. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2013, 16(August):29-40. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583613001229 [accessed 22.08.14].
4. Alexandrov G.A., Ames D., Bellocchi G., Bruen M., Crout N., Erechtchoukova M., et al. Technical assessment and evaluation of environmental models and software: Letter to the Editor. Environ Model Softw 2011, 26(March (3)):328-336. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364815210002318 [accessed 02.12.13].
5. Ascough J.C., Maier H.R., Ravalico J.K., Strudley M.W. Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecol Modell 2008, 219(December (3-4)):383-399. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304380008003554 [accessed 09.07.14].
6. AspenTech Aspen plus 2014, AspenTech, Ten Canal Park, Cambridge, MA, 02141-2201, US, Available from: http://www.aspentech.com.
7. Boone I., Van der Stede Y., Bollaerts K., Vose D., Maes D., Dewulf J., et al. NUSAP method for evaluating the data quality in a quantitative microbial risk assessment model for Salmonella in the pork production chain. Risk Anal 2009, 29(April (4)):502-517. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19192236 [accessed 09.12.14].
8. 2 capture technologies 2011.
9. Ciroth A. Cost data quality considerations for eco-efficiency measures. Ecol Econ 2009, 68(April (6)):1583-1590. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800908003583 [accessed 24.09.14].
10. Colonna P. Personal communication 2013.
11. 2 capture with aqueous ammonia using the Extended UNIQUAC model. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2012, 10(September):74-87. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S175058361200120X [accessed 08.10.13].
12. Eerhart A.J.J.E., Huijgen W.J.J., Grisel R.J.H., van der Waal J.C., de Jong E., de Sousa Dias A., et al. Fuels and plastics from lignocellulosic biomass via the furan pathway; a technical analysis. RSC Adv 2014, 4:3536. Available from: http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c3ra43512a.
13. 2 capture technology-the U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2008, 2(January (1)):9-20. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583607000941 [accessed 23.05.14].
14. Fredriksen S.B., Jens K.-J. Oxidative degradation of aqueous amine solutions of MEA, AMP, MDEA, Pz: a review. Energy Procedia 2013, 37(1876):1770-1777. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610213002968 [accessed 22.08.14].
15. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. Uncertainty and quality for science in policy 1990, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
16. 2 capture conditions 2004, 6400-6408.
17. 2O-alkanolamine systems. Chem Eng Sci 2010, 65(11):3638-3648. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.03.010.
18. 2 Capture, 2010/05 2010, IEAGHG, Stoke Orchard.
19. 2 with alkanolamine solutions predicted from reaction equilibrium constants. Chem Eng Sci 2009, 64(May (9)):2027-2038. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0009250908006866 [accessed 14.07.14].
20. Knol A.B., Petersen A.C., van der Sluijs J.P., Lebret E. Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment. Environ Health 2009, 8(January):21. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2684742&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [accessed 23.07.14].
21. Knol A.B., Slottje P., van der Sluijs J.P., Lebret E. The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure. Environ Health 2010, 9(19):16.
22. 2 capture process in pilot-scale. Energy Procedia 2011, 4(January):1558-1565. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610211002220 [accessed 08.10.13].
23. 2 absorption pilot plant at Esbjerg coal-fired power plant. Proc Eur Congr Chem Eng 2007, 16-20.
24. 2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: testing of different amine solvents. Energy Procedia 2009, 1(February (1)):783-790. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610209001052 [accessed 25.10.13].
25. Kvamsdal H.M., Haugen G., Svendsen H.F., Tobiesen A., Mangalapally H., Hartono A., et al. Modelling and simulation of the Esbjerg pilot plant using the Cesar 1 solvent. Energy Procedia 2011, 4(January):1644-1651. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610211002335 [accessed 08.10.13].
26. 2. Indu 2009, 48:9061-9067.
27. Matthews K.B., Rivington M., Blackstock K., McCrum G., Buchan K., Miller D.G. Raising the bar? - The challenges of evaluating the outcomes of environmental modelling and software. Environ Model Softw 2011, 26(March (3)):247-257. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364815210000903 [accessed 02.06.14].
28. Nord L.O., Gong B., Bolland O., McRae G.J. Incorporation of uncertainty analysis in modeling of integrated reforming combined cycle. Energy Convers Manag 2010, 51(October (10)):2068-2078. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196890410001068 [accessed 20.12.13].
29. Notz R., Tönnies I., Mangalapally H.P., Hoch S., Hasse H. A short-cut method for assessing absorbents for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2011, 5(May (3)):413-421. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583610000459 [accessed 14.10.13].
30. Patel A.D., Serrano-Ruiz J.C., Dumesic J.A., Anex R.P. Techno-economic analysis of 5-nonanone production from levulinic acid. Chem Eng J 2010, 160(1):311-321. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.034.
31. 2 absorption, including a detailed evaluation of the development potential. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2007, 1(October (4)):396-417. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583607000680 [cited 21.11.14].
32. Pohjola M.V., Pohjola P., Tainio M., Tuomisto J.T. Perspectives to performance of environment and health assessments and models--from outputs to outcomes?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013, 10(July (7)):2621-2642. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3734447&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [accessed 02.06.14].
33. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36(October (20)):4467-4475. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12387425.
34. Reagan M.T., Najm H.N., Pébay P.P., Knio O.M., Ghanem R.G. Quantifying uncertainty in chemical systems modeling. Int J Chem Kinet 2005, 37(June (6)):368-382. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/kin.20081 [accessed 28.05.14].
35. Red-Horse J.R., Benjamin A.S. A probabilistic approach to uncertainty quantification with limited information. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2004, 85(July (1-3)):183-190. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0951832004000596 [accessed 28.05.14].
36. Risbey J., van der Sluijs J.P., Ravetz J. A protocol for assessment of uncertainty and strength of emissions data 2001, Utrecht.
37. Rubin E.S., Mantripragada H., Marks A., Versteeg P., Kitchin J. The outlook for improved carbon capture technology. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2012, 38(October (5)):630-671. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360128512000184 [accessed 08.10.13].
38. 2 from power plants with CCS, 2012/03. Stoke Orchard 2012.
39. 2 capture demonstration plant using Fluor's econamine FG PlusSM technology at NRG's WA Parish Electric Generating Station. Energy Procedia 2013, 37(January):6553-6561. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610213008308 [accessed 22.10.13].
40. Sexton A.J., Rochelle G.T. Reaction products from the oxidative degradation of monoethanolamine. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011, 50(January (2)):667-673. Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie901053.
41. Sigel K., Klauer B., Pahl-Wostl C. Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: The example of the EU water framework directive. Ecol Econ 2010, 69(January (3)):502-510. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921800909004613 [accessed 23.07.14].
42. Van der Sluijs J.P., Craye M., Funtowicz S., Kloprogge P., Ravetz J., Risbey J. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Anal 2005, 25(April (2)):481-492. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15876219.
43. Van der Sluijs J.P., Janssen P.H.M., Petersen P., Kloprogge P., Risbey J., Tuinstra W., et al. RIVM/MNP guidance for uncertainty assessment and communication: tool catalogue for uncertainty assessment. Report nr: NWS-E-2004-37. The Netherlands 2004.
44. Van der Sluijs J.P., Potting J., Risbey J., Van Vuuren D., De Vries B., Beusen A., et al. Uncertainty assessment of the IMAGE/TIMER B1 CO 2 emissions scenario, using the NUSAP method. Report no: 410 200 104 (2002). Utrecht 2002.
45. Van der Spek M., Ramirez A. A Structured approach for selecting carbon capture process models. A case study on monoethanolamine. Energy Procedia 2014, 63:1287-1295. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610214019523 [accessed 09.02.15].
46. 2 absorption from power plant flue gas streams. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2009, 3(March (2)):133-142. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583608000625 [accessed 29.10.13].
47. Tobiesen A. Personal communication 2014.
48. 2 absorption plants. Energy Procedia 2011, 4(January):1745-1752. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1876610211002463 [accessed 08.10.13].
49. Tobiesen F.A., Juliussen O., Svendsen H.F. Experimental validation of a rigorous desorber model for post-combustion capture. Chem Eng Sci 2008, 63(May (10)):2641-2656. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0009250908000754 [accessed 09.12.14].
50. 2 postcombustion capture. AIChE J 2007, 53(4):846-865.
51. Vicari K.J., Tallam S.S., Shatova T., Joo K.K., Scarlata C.J., Humbird D., et al. Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5(January (1)):23. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3503575&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract [accessed 20.12.13].
52. 2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2013, 12(January):472-477. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1750583612002824 [accessed 29.10.13].
53. Walker W., Harremoes P., Rotmas J., Van der Sluijs J., Asset M., Janssen P., et al. Defining uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr Assess 2003, 4(1):5-17.
54. 2 absorption in aqueous MEA solution with electrolyte NRTL model. Fluid Phase Equilib 2011, 311(December):67-75. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378381211004043 [accessed 14.07.14].