Quantitative ethylene measurements with MOx chemiresistive sensors at different relative air humidities

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 28088-28098

  Krivec, Matic ^a   Mc Gunnigle, Gerald ^a   Abram, Anže ^b   Maier, Dieter ^c   Waldner, Roland ^c   Gostner, Johanna M ^d   Überall, Florian ^d   Leitner, Raimund ^a  

^a CTR CARINTHIAN TECH RESEARCH AG   (Austria)

^b JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^c Innovation Laboratory   (Netherlands)

^d INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Chemiresistive sensor; Ethylene; Linear regression model; Relative humidity

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; LINEAR REGRESSION; METALS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIN OXIDES; TUNGSTEN;

CHEMIRESISTIVE SENSORS; ETHYLENE CONCENTRATION; ETHYLENE MEASUREMENTS; LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS; METAL OXIDE (MOX) SENSORS; RELATIVE AIR HUMIDITIES; SENSOR OUTPUT; TUNGSTEN OXIDE;

ETHYLENE;

ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; OXIDE; STANNIC OXIDE; TIN DERIVATIVE; TUNGSTEN; TUNGSTEN OXIDE;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOOD ANALYSIS; HUMIDITY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES, ANALYTICAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ETHYLENES; FOOD ANALYSIS; HUMIDITY; LINEAR MODELS; OXIDES; TIN COMPOUNDS; TUNGSTEN;

EID: 84946593862     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s151128088     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Esser, B.; Schnorr, J.M.; Swager, T.M. Selective Detection of Ethylene Gas Using Carbon Nanotube-based Devices: Utility in Determination of Fruit Ripeness. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1-6.
2. Janssen, S.; Schmitt, K.; Blanke, M.; Bauersfeld, M.L.; Wöllenstein, J.; Lang, W. Ethylene Detection in Fruit Supply Chain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2014, 372, doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0311.
3. Povarov, V.G.; Lopatnikov, A.I.; Geibo, D.S.; Bulatova, A.V.; Razgonyaev, A.O. Use of Semiconductor Oxide Film for the Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Gas Phase. J. Anal. Chem. 2013, 68, 300-304.
4. Nenova, Z.; Dimchev, G.; Compensation of the Impact of Disturbing Factors on Gas Sensor Characteristics. Acta. Polytech. Hung. 2013, 10, 97-111.
5. Xing, R.; Xu, L.; Song, J.; Zhou, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, D.; Song, H.W. Preparation and Gas SensingProperties of In2O3/Au Nanorods for Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, doi:10.1038/srep10717.
6. Giberti, A.; Carotta, M.C.; Guidi, V.; Malagu, C.; Martinelli, G.; Piga, M.; Vendemiati, B. Monitoring of Ethylene for Agro-Alimentary Applications and Compensation of Humidity Effects. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 103, 272-276.
7. Neri, G. First Fifty Years of Chemoresistive Gas Sensors. Chemosensors 2015, 3, 1-20.
8. Wang, C.; Yin, L; Zhang, L.; Xiang, D.; Gao, R. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors: Sensitivity andInfluencing Factors. Sensors 2010, 10, 2088-2106.
9. Dai, Z.; Lee, C.-S.; Tian, Y.; Kim, I.-D.; Lee, J.-H. Highly Reversible Switching from P- to N- Type NO2 Sensing in a Monolayer Fe2O3 Inverse Opal Film and the Associated P-N transition diagram. J. Mater. Chem. 2015, 3, 3372-3381.
10. Lee, C.Y.; Strano, M.S. Understanding the Dynamics of Signal Transduction for Adsorption of Gases and Vapors on Carbon Nanotube Sensors. Langmuir 2005, 21, 5192-5196.
11. Qi, Q.; Zhang, T.; Zheng, X.; Fan, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, R.; Zeng, Y. Electrical Response of Sm2O3-doped SnO2 to C2H2 and Effect of Humidity Interference. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 134, 36-42.
12. Hübner, M.; Simion, C.E.; Tomescu-Stanoiu, A.; Pokhrel, S.; Barsan, N.; Weimar, U. Influence of Humidity on CO Sensing with P-Type CuO Thick Filme Gas Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 153, 347-535.
13. Krivec, M.; Leitner, R.; Waldner, R.; Gostner, J.; Überall, F. The Effect of Sensor Temperature and MOx Layer Thickness on the Sensitivity of SnO2- and WO3-based Chemiresistive Sensors to Ethylene Gas. In Proceedings of the Smart Sensors, Actuators, and MEMS VII; and Cyber Physical Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 4 May 2015.