Analytical and Decision Support Tools for Genomics-Assisted Breeding

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 354-363

  Varshney, Rajeev K ^a,b   Singh, Vikas K ^a   Hickey, John M ^c   Xun, Xu ^d   Marshall, David F ^e   Wang, Jun ^d   Edwards, David ^b   Ribaut, Jean Marcel ^f  

^a INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^e SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^f Generation Challenge Programme   (Mexico)

Author keywords

data management; decision support tools; genetic mapping; genomic selection; genomics assisted breeding; marker assisted selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946578164     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.018     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Varshney, R.K., et al. Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 (2013), 83–99.
2. Varshney, R.K., et al. Marker assisted backcrossing to introgress resistance to Fusarium wilt (FW) race 1 and Ascochyta blight (AB) in C 214, an elite cultivar of chickpea. Plant Genome, 7, 2014, 11.
3. Xu, Y., Molecular Plant Breeding. 2010, CAB International.
4. Brown, A.H.D., Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31 (1989), 818–824.
5. Upadhyaya, H.D., Oritz, R., A mini core subset for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102 (2001), 1292–1298.
6. Upadhyaya, H.D., et al. Genetic structure, diversity, and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Plant Biol., 8, 2008, 106.
7. Varshney, R.K., et al. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops?. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 (2012), 1172–1176.
8. Labbate, J.A., Software for population genetic analyses of molecular marker data. Crop Sci. 40 (2000), 1521–1528.
9. Rohlf, F.J., NTSYS-pc (Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System). Version 1.70. 1992, Exeter.
10. Tamura, K., et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28 (2011), 2731–2739.
11. Lee, T.H., et al. SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics, 15, 2014, 162.
12. Excoffier, L., et al. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1 (2005), 47–50.
13. Librado, P., Rozas, J., DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25 (2009), 1451–1452.
14. Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E., GenAlex 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28 (2012), 2537–2539.
15. Liu, K., Muse, S.V., PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21 (2005), 2128–2129.
16. Glaszmann, J.C., et al. Accessing genetic diversity for crop improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13 (2010), 167–173.
17. Huang, B.E., et al. Selecting subsets of genotyped experimental populations for phenotyping to maximize genetic diversity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126 (2012), 379–388.
18. Kim, K.W., et al. PowerCore: a program applying the advanced M strategy with a heuristic search for establishing core sets. Bioinformatics 23 (2007), 515–526.
19. van Hintum, T.J., Data resolution: a jackknife procedure for determining the consistency of molecular marker datasets. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115 (2007), 343–349.
20. Jin, C., et al. Selective phenotyping for increased efficiency in genetic mapping studies. Genetics 168 (2004), 2285–2293.
21. Jannink, J.L., Selective phenotyping to accurately map quantitative trait loci. Crop Sci. 45 (2005), 901–908.
22. Wu, Y., et al. Efficient and accurate construction of genetic linkage maps from the minimum spanning tree of a graph. PLoS Genet., 4, 2008, e1000212.
23. Cheema, J., Dicks, J., Computational approaches and software tools for genetic linkage map estimation in plants. Brief. Bioinform. 10 (2009), 595–608.
24. Lander, E.S., et al. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1 (1987), 174–181.
25. Liu, R., Meng, J., [MapDraw: a Microsoft Excel macro for drawing genetic linkage maps based on given genetic linkage data]. Yi Chuan 25 (2003), 317–321 (in Chinese).
26. Van Os, H., et al. RECORD: a novel method for ordering loci on a genetic linkage map. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112 (2005), 30–40.
27. Zhao, et al. SEG-Map: a novel software for genotype calling and genetic map construction from next-generation sequencing. Rice 3 (2010), 98–102.
28. Somers, D.J., et al. A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 109 (2004), 1105–1114.
29. Varshney, R.K., et al. A high density barley microsatellite consensus map with 775 SSR loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114 (2007), 1091–1103.
30. Gautami, B., et al. An international reference consensus genetic map with 897 marker loci based on 11 mapping populations for tetraploid groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). PLoS ONE, 7, 2012, e41213.
31. Shirasawa, K., et al. Integrated consensus map of cultivated peanut and wild relatives reveals structures of the A and B genomes of Arachis and divergence of the legume genomes. DNA Res. 20 (2013), 173–180.
32. Endelman, J.B., Plomion, C., LPmerge: an R package for merging genetic maps by linear programming. Bioinformatics 30 (2014), 1623–1624.
33. Hirsch, C.N., et al. Insights into the maize pan-genome and pan-transcriptome. Plant Cell 26 (2014), 121–135.
34. Schatz, M.C., et al. Whole genome de novo assemblies of three divergent strains of rice, Oryza sativa, document novel gene space of aus and indica. Genome Biol., 15, 2014, 506.
35. Li, Y.H., et al. De novo assembly of soybean wild relatives for pan-genome analysis of diversity and agronomic traits. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 1045–1052.
36. Lander, E.S., Botstein, D., Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121 (1989), 185–199.
37. Manly, K.F., et al. Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm. Genome 12 (2001), 930–932.
38. Joehanes, R., Nelson, J.C., QGene 4.0, an extensible Java QTL-analysis platform. Bioinformatics 24 (2008), 2788–2789.
39. Utz, H.F., Melchinger, A.E., PLABQTL: a program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J. Agric. Genomics 2 (1996), 1–4.
40. Varshney, R.K., et al. Molecular plant breeding: methodology and achievements. Methods Mol. Biol. 513 (2009), 283–304.
41. Li, H., et al. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116 (2008), 243–260.
42. Yang, J., et al. QTLNetwork: mapping and visualizing genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations. Bioinformatics 24 (2008), 721–723.
43. Mott, R., et al. A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (2000), 12649–12654.
44. Broman, K.W., et al. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19 (2003), 889–890.
45. Broman, K.W., The genomes of recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 169 (2005), 1133–1146.
46. Huang, B.E., George, A.W., R/mpMap: a computational platform for the genetic analysis of multi-parent recombinant inbred lines. Bioinformatics 27 (2011), 727–729.
47. Veyrieras, J.B., et al. MetaQTL: a package of new computational methods for the meta-analysis of QTL mapping experiments. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 2007, 49.
48. Sosnowski, O., et al. BioMercator V3: an upgrade of genetic map compilation and quantitative trait loci meta-analysis algorithms. Bioinformatics 28 (2012), 2082–2083.
49. Voorrips, R.E., MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 93 (2002), 77–78.
50. Chibon, P.Y., et al. MQ2: visualizing multi-trait mapped QTL results. Mol. Breed. 32 (2013), 981–985.
51. Broman, K.W., R/qtlcharts: interactive graphics for quantitative trait locus mapping. Genetics 199 (2014), 359–361.
52. Pritchard, J.K., et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155 (2000), 945–959.
53. Porras-Hurtado, L., et al. An overview of STRUCTURE: applications, parameter settings and supporting software. Front. Genet. 4 (2013), 1–13.
54. Kalinowski, S.T., Powell, J.H., A parameter to quantify the degree of genetic mixing among individuals in hybrid populations. Heredity 114 (2015), 249–254.
55. Price, A.L., et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38 (2006), 904–909.
56. Corander, J., Marttinen, P., Bayesian identification of admixture events using multilocus molecular markers. Mol. Ecol. 15 (2006), 2833–2843.
57. Yoo, J., et al. SNPAnalyzer 2.0: a web-based integrated workbench for linkage disequilibrium analysis and association analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 2008, 290.
58. Bradbury, P.J., et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23 (2007), 2633–2635.
59. Zhang, Z., et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42 (2010), 355–360.
60. Purcell, S., et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81 (2007), 559–575.
61. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, et al. Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants. Nat. Genet. 39 (2007), 1329–1337.
62. Gupta, P.K., et al. Marker assisted selection as a component of conventional plant breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 33 (2010), 145–217.
63. Varshney, R.K., et al. Translational genomics in agriculture: some examples in grain legumes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 34 (2015), 169–194.
64. Van Berloo, R., Computer note: GGT 2.0: versatile software for visualization and analysis of genetic data. J. Hered. 99 (2008), 232–236.
65. Milne, I., et al. Flapjack – graphical genotype visualization. Bioinformatics 26 (2010), 3133–3134.
66. Lorieux, M., MapDisto: fast and efficient computation of genetic linkage maps. Mol. Breed. 30 (2012), 1231–1235.
67. Valente, F., et al. OptiMAS: a decision support tool for marker-assisted assembly of diverse alleles. J. Hered. 104 (2013), 586–590.
68. Meuwissen, T.H.E., Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157 (2001), 1819–1829.
69. de los Campos, G., et al. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182 (2009), 375–385.
70. Habier, D., et al. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics, 23, 2011, 186.
71. Legarra, A., et al. Improved LASSO for genomic selection. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 93 (2011), 77–87.
72. Breiman, L., Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45 (2001), 5–32.
73. Tecle, I.Y., et al. solGS: a web-based tool for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 2014, 398.
74. Azam, S., et al. An integrated SNP mining and utilization (ISMU) pipeline for next generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE, 9, 2014, e101754.
75. Rathore, A., et al. ISMU 2.0: a multi-algorithm pipeline for genomic selection. Plant and Animal Genome XXII, January 11-15, San Diego, CA, 2015, Scherago.
76. Schneeberger, K., et al. SHOREmap: simultaneous mapping and mutation identification by deep sequencing. Nat. Methods 6 (2009), 550–551.
77. Austin, R.S., et al. Next-generation mapping of Arabidopsis genes. Plant J. 67 (2011), 715–725.
78. Abe, A., et al. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 (2012), 174–178.
79. Takagi, H., et al. QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 74 (2013), 174–183.
80. Minevich, G., et al. CloudMap: a cloud-based pipeline for analysis of mutant genome sequences. Genetics 192 (2012), 1249–1269.
81. Barrett, J.C., et al. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21 (2005), 263–265.
82. Delaneau, O., et al. Improved whole chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nat. Methods 10 (2013), 5–6.
83. Scheet, P., Stephens, M., A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78 (2006), 629–644.
84. Purcell, S., et al. WHAP: haplotype-based association analysis. Bioinformatics 23 (2007), 255–256.
85. Zhang, K., Jin, L., HaploBlockFinder: haplotype block analyses. Bioinformatics 19 (2003), 1300–1301.
86. Delannay, X., et al. Fostering molecular breeding in developing countries. Mol. Breed. 29 (2012), 857–873.