Mixed method evaluation of a community-based physical activity program using the RE-AIM framework: Practical application in a real-world setting Energy balance-related behaviors

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Koorts, Harriet ^a   Gillison, Fiona ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Physical activity; Program evaluation; RE AIM

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOPTION; CHILD; DOCUMENTATION; ENERGY BALANCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SPORT; TRIANGULATION; COMMUNITY CARE; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84946566538     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2466-y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Department of Health. Start Active, Stay Active: A report on physical activity from the four home countries' Chief Medical Officers. London: Department of Health; 2011.
2. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. World Health Organization. Switzerland: 2010.
3. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Health Survey for England 2012. Trend tables. Health and Social Care Information Centre. United Kingdom: 2012.
4. Dobbins M, De Corby K, Robeson P, Husson H, Tirilis D. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009.
5. de Meester F, van Lenthe F, Spittaels H, Lien N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Interventions for promoting physical activity among European teenagers: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:82.
6. van Sluijs E, McMinn A, Griffin S. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):703.
7. Dzewaltowski D, Estabrooks P, Klesges L, Bull S, Glasgow R. Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results? Health Promot Int. 2004;19(2):235-45.
8. Glasgow R, Klesges L, Dzewaltowski D, Bull S, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(1):3-12.
9. Antikainen L, Ellis R. A RE-AIM Evaluation of Theory-Based Physical Activity Interventions. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33:198-214.
10. Owen N, Glanz K, Sallis JF, Kelder SH. Evidence-Based Approaches to Dissemination and Diffusion of Physical Activity Interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(4, Supplement):35-44.
11. Glasgow R, Vogt T, Boles S. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7.
12. Austin G, Bell T, Caperchione C, Mummery W. Translating Research to Practice: Using the RE-AIM Framework to Examine an Evidence-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Primary School Settings. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12:932-41.
13. Caperchione CM, Duncan M, Kolt GS, Vandelanotte C, Rosenkranz RR, Maeder A, et al. Examining an Australian physical activity and nutrition intervention using RE-AIM. Health Promot Int. 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
14. Van Acker R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K, Klesges L, Cardon G. The impact of disseminating the whole-community project '10,000 Steps': a RE-AIM analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:3.
15. Bopp M, Wilcox S, Laken M, Hooker S, Saunders R, Parra-Medina D, et al. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a physical activity intervention in churches. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4(4).
16. Klesges L, Estabrooks P, Dzewaltowski D, Bull S, Glasgow R. Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29(Suppl):66-75.
17. NICE. Behaviour change: The principles for effective interventions. 2007.
18. Weightman A, Ellis S, Cullum A, Sander L, Turley R. Grading evidence and recommendations for public health interventions: developing and piloting a framework. 2005.
19. Creswell J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2003.
20. Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2005.
21. Greene J. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2007.
22. Yin R. Case study research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. 2003.
23. Greene J, Benjamic I, Goodyear I. The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation. 2001;7(1):25-44.
24. Sallis J, Owen N. Ecological models. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behaviour and health education: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997. p. 403-24.
25. McLeroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351-77.
26. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173-94.
27. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Great Britain: Sage Publications Inc; 2003.
28. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc; 1985.
29. Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Inc: Sage Publications; 1994.
30. Burke SM, Shapiro S, Petrella RJ, Irwin J, Jackman M, Pearson E, et al. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a community-based summer camp for children with obesity: a prospective feasibility study. BMC Obes. 2015;2:21.
31. de Meij J, Chinapaw M, Kremers S, Van der Wal M, Jurg M, Van Mechelen W. Promoting physical activity in children: The stepwise development of the primary school-based JUMP-in intervention applying the RE-AIM evaluation framework. Br J Sports Med. 2008;44(12):879-87.
32. McGoey T, Root Z, Bruner MW, Law B. Evaluation of physical activity interventions in youth via the Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials. Prev Med. 2015;76:58-67.
33. Glasgow R, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261-7.
34. McKenzie R, Naccarella L, Stewart A, Thompson C. Targeting what matters in health promotion evaluation. Using the RE-AIM approach to identify success in real-world settings. Eval J Australasia. 2007;7(1):19-26.
35. Dzewaltowski D, Estabrooks P, Glasgow R. The future of physical activity behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004;32(2):57-63.
36. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What Does It Mean to "Employ" the RE-AIM Model? Eval Health Prof. 2012;36(1):67-72.
37. Brownson RC, Brennan LK, Evenson KR, Leviton LC. Lessons from a mixed-methods approach to evaluating Active Living by Design. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5 Suppl 4):S271-80.
38. Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:568.
39. Jolley G. Evaluating complex community-based health promotion: addressing the challenges. Eval Program Plann. 2014;45:71-81.
40. Klesges L, Dzewaltowski D, Glasgow R. Review of external validity reporting in childhood obesity prevention research. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(3):216-23.
41. de Meij J, Chinapaw M, van Stralen M, van der Wal M, van Dieren L, van Mechelen W. Effectiveness of JUMP-in, a Dutch primary school-based community intervention aimed at the promotion of physical activity. Br J Sports Med. 2010;45:1052-7.
42. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:119-27.
43. Yin R. Case study research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003.
44. Merriam S. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass; 2009.
45. Creswell J, Plano Clark V. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2007.
46. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.