The impact of inoculum source, inoculum to substrate ratio and sample preservation on methane potential from different substrates

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 83, Issue , 2015, Pages 474-482

  Moset, Veronica ^a   Al zohairi, Nawras ^a   Møller, Henrik B ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Inoculum source; Inoculum substrate ratio; Methane production rate; Sample preservation; Ultimate methane potential

Indexed keywords

DRYING; FREEZING; MANURES; METHANE; STRAW;

INOCULUM SOURCES; INOCULUM/SUBSTRATE RATIO; METHANE POTENTIAL; METHANE PRODUCTION; SAMPLE PRESERVATION;

SUBSTRATES;

BIOMASS; CATTLE; CELLULOSE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GRASS; INOCULATION; MAIZE; MANURE; METHANE; PRESERVATION; SILAGE; STRAW; SUBSTRATE; VOLATILE SUBSTANCE; WHEAT;

ANIMALIA; BOS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84946546008     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: 18732909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Energiministeriet K.-o. Energi Strategi 2050-fra kul, olie og gas til grøn energi. Sammenfatning [From coal, oil and gas to green energy. Summary] 2011, Regeringen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2. Association EB A Biogas Road Map for Europe 2009, Report, European Biomass Association AEBIOM.
3. IPCC Emissions from livestock and manure management. Agriculture, Forestry and Land Use 2006, vol. 4. Kanagawa, Japan.
4. Owen W., Stuckey D.C., Healy J.B., Young L.Y., McCarty P.L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979, 13(6):485-492.
5. Angelidaki I., Alves M., Bolzonella D., Borzacconi L., Campos J.L., Guwy A.J., Kalyuzhnyi S., Jenicek P., van Lier J.B. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(5):927-934.
6. ISO 11734:1995 Water Quality - Evaluation of the "Ultimate" Anaerobic Biodegradability of Organic Compounds in Digested Sludge - Method by Measurement of the Biogas Production 1996, 13. BSI. first ed.
7. Raposo F., Fernández-Cegrí V., De la Rubia M.A., Borja R., Béline F., Cavinato C., Demirer G., Fernández B., Fernández-Polanco M., Frigon J.C., Ganesh R., Kaparaju P., Koubova J., Méndez R., Menin G., Peene A., Scherer P., Torrijos M., Uellendahl H., Wierinck I., de Wilde V. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86:1088-1098.
8. Vedrenne F., Béline F., Dabert P., Bernet N. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(1):146-155.
9. Kohn R.A., Allen M.S. Storage of fresh and ensiled forages by freezing affects fibre and crude protein fractions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992, 58(2):215-220.
10. Amon T., Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Zollitsch W., Mayer K., Gruber L. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure-influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 118(1):173-182.
11. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washintong DC, USA. 21th Ed. A.E. Greenberg, L.S. Clesceri, A.D. Eaton (Eds.).
12. Møller H.B., Sommer S.G., Ahring B.K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26(5):485-495.
13. Hashimoto A.G. Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and production rate from straw. Biol. Wastes 1989, 28(4):247-255.
14. Lo H.M., Kurniawan T.A., Sillanpää M.E.T., Pai T.Y., Chiang C.F., Chao K.P., Liu M.H., Chuang S.H., Banks C.J., Wang S.C., Lin K.C., Lin C.Y., Liu W.F., Cheng P.H., Chen C.K., Chiu H.Y., Wu H.Y. Modeling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(16):6329-6335.
15. SAS SAS User's Guide: Statics 2001, Ver. 9.0., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
16. Hansen T.L., Schmidt J.E., Angelidaki I., Marca E., Jansen J la C., Mosbæk H., Christensen T.H. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manag. 2004, 24:393-400.
17. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Status and future trends. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 109:95-105.
18. Mateescu C., Constantinescu I. Comparative analysis of inoculum biomass for biogas potential in the anaerobic digestion. UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. B 2011, 73(3):99-104.
19. Hashimoto A.G., Varel V.H., Chen Y.R. Ultimate methane yield from beef cattle manure: effect of temperature, ration constituents, antibiotics and manure age. Agric. Waste 1981, 3(4):241-256.
20. Palatsi J., Gimenez-Lorang A., Ferrer I., Flotats X. Start-up strategies of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(9):1777-1784.
21. Moset V., Poulsen M., Wahid R., Højberg O., Møller H.B. Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8(5):787-800.
22. Buswell A.M., Mueller H.F. Mechanics of methane fermentation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1952, 44:550-552.
23. Gunaseelan V.N. Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:389-399.
24. Veeken A., Hamelers B. Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 69:249-254.
25. Raposo F., Banks C.J., Siegert I., Heaven S., Borja R. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochem. 2006, 41(6):1444-1450.
26. Angelidaki I., Sanders W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2004, 3:117-129.
27. Raposo F., Borja R., Martín M.A., Martín A., de la Rubia M.A., Rincón B. Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149:70-77.
28. Kreuger E., Nges I.A., Björnsson L. Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4:44.
29. Zubr J. Methanogenic fermentation of fresh and ensiled plant materials. Biomass 1986, 11(3):159-171.
30. Lowman R.S., Theodorou M.K., Cuddeford D. The effect of sample processing on gas production profiles obtained using the pressure transducer technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2002, 97(3):221-237.