Elevated amniotic fluid lactate predicts labor disorders and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women at term

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 213, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 673.e1-673.e8

  Murphy, Martina ^a,b   Butler, Michelle ^c   Coughlan, Barbara ^b   Brennan, Donal ^a,b   O'Herlihy, Colm ^a,b   Robson, Michael ^a  

^a NATIONAL MATERNITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

active management of labor; amniotic fluid lactate; cesarean delivery; labor disorder (dystocia)

Indexed keywords

AMNIOTIC FLUID LACTATE; LACTIC ACID; OXYTOCIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMNION FLUID; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DRUG MEGADOSE; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONTANEOUS LABOR; TERM BIRTH; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; CHEMISTRY; DECISION TREE; METABOLISM; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; UTERUS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMNIOTIC FLUID; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION TREES; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84946490556     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.035     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. I. Delbare, H. Cammu, E. Martens, and et al. Limiting the cesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 12 2012 3
2. R. Ovostar, A. Rashidian, A. Pourreza, and et al. Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10 2010 52
3. P. Lumbiganon, M. Laopaiboon, A.M. Gulmezoglu, and et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia; the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08 Lancet 375 2010 440 442
4. B. Zhu, V. Grigorescu, T. Le, and et al. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval Am J Obstet Gynecol 85 2006 810 814
5. A.P. Betran, M. Meraldi, J.A. Lauer, and et al. Rates of cesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21 2007 98 113
6. S. Quenby, A. Matthew, J. Zhang, and et al. In vitro myometrial contractility reflects indication for cesarean section Br J Obstet Gynaecol 118 2011 1499 1506
7. S. Quenby, S. Pierce, S. Brigham, and S. Wray Dysfunctional labor and myometrial lactic acidosis Obstet Gynecol 103 2004 718 723
8. S. Wray, K. Jones, S. Kuppittanants, and et al. Calcium signaling and uterine contractility J Soc Gynaecol Investig 10 2003 252 264
9. G.A. Brooks The lactate shuttle during exercise and recovery Med Sci Sports Exerc 18 1986 360 368
10. E. Wilberg-Itzel, H. Petterson, S. Cnattingus, and L. Nordstrom Association between lactate concentration in amniotic fluid and dysfunctional labor Acta Obstet Gynecol 87 2008 924 992
11. M.S. Robson Classification of cesarean sections Fetal Matern Med Rev 12 2001 23 39
12. L.M. Harper, A.B. Caughey, K.A. Roehl, and et al. Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 210 2014 536.e1 536.e7
13. Robson M. National Maternity Hospital Clinical Report for the year 2010. Dublin, Ireland: National Maternity Hospital.
14. M. Robson, L. Hartigan, and M. Murphy Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate cesarean section rate Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27 2013 297 308
15. Twomey A. National Maternity Hospital Neonatal Clinical report 2010. Dublin, Ireland: National Maternity Hospital.
16. J. Zhang, J. Troendle, U. Reddy, and et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 2010 326.e1 326.e10
17. K. O'Driscoll, D. Meagher, and M. Robson Active management of labor 2003 Elsevier Sciences Limited Philadelphia, PA
18. W. Cohen, and A. Friedman Perils of the new labor management guidelines Am J Obstet Gynecol 212 2015 420 427
19. A. Caughey, A. Cahill, J.M. Guise, and et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 123 2014 693 711
20. B. Mercer, T. McNanley, J. O'Brien, and et al. Early versus late amniotomy for labor induction: a randomized trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 173 1995 1321 1325
21. P. Stewart, J.H. Kennedy, and A. Calder Spontaneous labor: when should the membranes be ruptured? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95 1982 105 106
22. H. Rosen, L. Hiersh, L. Saltzer, and et al. Amniotomy: does artificial rupturing of membranes in the active phase enhance myometrial electrical activity? A common practice still in controversy Am J Obstet Gynecol 208 2013 S140
23. P. Mittal, R. Romero, A.L. Tarca, and et al. A molecular signature of an arrest of descent in human parturition Am J Obstet Gynecol 204 2011 177.e15 177.e33
24. D. Brennan, M. Robson, M. Murphy, and C. O'Herlihy Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 2009 308.e1 308.e8
25. P. Stewart, C. Dulberg, A. Chapman, T. Elmslie, and P.F. Hall Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton CMAJ 142 1990 459 463