Quantum Entanglement in Concept Combinations

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 3587-3603

  Aerts, Diederik ^a   Sozzo, Sandro ^a,b  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bell inequalities; Entanglement; EPR Bell experiments; Quantum cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946485524     PISSN: 00207748     EISSN: 15729575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-013-1946-z     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Quantum structures in cognition: why and how concepts are entangled. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7052, pp. 118–129. Springer, Berlin (2011)
2. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)
3. Aerts, D.: A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 27, 202–210 (1986)
4. Aerts, D.: The construction of reality and its influence on the understanding of quantum structures. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31, 1815–1837 (1992)
5. Aerts, D.: Quantum structures, separated physical entities and probability. Found. Phys. 24, 1227–1259 (1994)
6. Aerts, D.: The hidden measurement formalism: what can be explained and where paradoxes remain. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37, 291–304 (1998)
7. Aerts, D.: Foundations of quantum physics: a general realistic and operational approach. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 289–358 (1999)
8. Aerts, D., Aerts, S.: Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Found. Sci. 1, 85–97 (1994)
9. Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Smets, S.: A quantum structure description of the liar paradox. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 3231–3239 (1999)
10. Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L.: The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld. Found. Phys. 30, 1387–1414 (2000)
11. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations I. The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes 34, 167–191 (2005)
12. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations II. A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34, 192–221 (2005)
13. Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E.: On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 9, 35–58 (1981)
14. Hampton, J.A.: Overextension of conjunctive concepts: evidence for a unitary model for concept typicality and class inclusion. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 14, 12–32 (1988)
15. Hampton, J.A.: Disjunction of natural concepts. Mem. Cogn. 16, 579–591 (1988)
16. Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E.: Gradedness and conceptual combination. Cognition 12, 299–318 (1982)
17. Komatsu, L.K.: Recent views on conceptual structure. Psychol. Bull. 112, 500–526 (1992)
18. Fodor, J.: Concepts: a potboiler. Cognition 50, 95–113 (1994)
19. Rips, L.J.: The current status of research on concept combination. Mind Lang. 10, 72–104 (1995)
20. Aerts, D.: Quantum structure in cognition. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 314–348 (2009)
21. Aerts, D., D’Hooghe, B., Haven, E.: Quantum experimental data in psychology and economics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49, 2971–2990 (2010)
22. Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Quantum structure and human thought. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 274–276 (2013)
23. Aerts, D., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 737–772 (2013)
24. Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Sofge, D. (eds.): In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction, March 27–29, Stanford University, Stanford (2007)
25. Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Sofge, D. (eds.): Quantum Interaction: Proceedings of the Second Quantum Interaction Symposium. College Publications, London (2008)
26. Bruza, P.D., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., Van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.): Proceedings of the Third Quantum Interaction Symposium. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5494. Springer, Berlin (2009)
27. Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum probability model explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2171–2178 (2009)
28. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure. Springer, Berlin (2010)
29. Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.): Quantum Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7052. Springer, Berlin (2011)
30. Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.S.: A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment ‘errors’. Psychol. Rev. 118, 193–218 (2011)
31. Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
32. Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds.) Quantum Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7620 (2012)
33. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969)
34. Accardi, L., Fedullo, A.: On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum theory. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 34, 161–172 (1982)
35. Pitowsky, I.: Quantum Probability, Quantum Logic. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 321. Springer, Berlin (1989)
36. Peres, A., Terno, D.R.: Quantum information and relativity theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 93–123 (2004)
37. Masanes, L., Acin, A., Gisin, N.: General properties of nonsignaling theories. Phys. Rev. A 73, 012112 (2006)
38. Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A.Y.: Anomalies in EPR-bell experiments. In: Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A.Y., Nieuwenhuizen, T. (eds.) Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations, vol. 3, pp. 283–293. AIP, New York (2006)
39. Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A.Y.: Is the fair sampling assumption supported by EPR experiments? J. Phys. A 40, 131–141 (2007)
40. Tsirelson, B.S.: Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93 (1980)
41. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Entanglement Zoo I: Foundational and Structural Aspects. LNCS (2014, in print)
42. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Entanglement Zoo II: Examples in Physics and Cognition. LNCS (2014, in print)
43. Aerts, D.: Quantum and concept combination, entangled measurements and prototype theory. Top. Cogn. Sci. (2014, to appear)
44. Aspect, A.: Bell’s inequality test: more ideal than ever. Nature 398, 189–190 (1982)
45. Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A.: Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(23), 5039 (1998)