Assessing the Collective Population Representativeness of Related Type 2 Diabetes Trials by Combining Public Data from ClinicalTrials.gov and NHANES

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 216, Issue , 2015, Pages 569-573

  He, Zhe ^a   Wang, Shuang ^a   Borhanian, Elhaam ^a   Weng, Chunhua ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical Trial; Patient Selection; Selection Bias

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; HEALTH; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EXTERNAL VALIDITIES; PATIENT POPULATION; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELECTION BIAS; TYPE-2 DIABETES;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

AGED; CLASSIFICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIET THERAPY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION; PREVALENCE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

AGED; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIET THERAPY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION SURVEYS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREVALENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; THERAPEUTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84946232583     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-569     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. van de Water W, Kiderlen M, Bastiaannet E, et al. External validity of a trial comprised of elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014: 106(4):dju051.
2. Blanco C, Olfson M, Goodwin RD, et al. Generalizability of clinical trial results for major depression to community samples: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2008: 69(8): 1276-80.
3. Hao T, Rusanov A, Boland MR, Weng C. Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features. J Biomed Inform 2014: 52: 112-20.
4. Weng C, Li Y, Ryan P, et al. A Distribution-based Method for Assessing The Differences between Clinical Trial Target Populations and Patient Populations in Electronic Health Records. Appl Clin Inform 2014: 5(2): 463-79.
5. Rusanov A, Weiskopf NG, Wang S, Weng C. Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014: 14:51.
6. CDC. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: http://www. cdc. gov/nchs/nhanes. htm.
7. Chen DP, Morgan AA, Butte AJ. Validating pathophysiological models of aging using clinical electronic medical records. J Biomed Inform 2010: 43(3): 358-64.
8. Bays HE, Chapman RH, Grandy S, Group SI. The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys. Int J Clin Pract 2007: 61(5): 737-47.
9. He Z, Carini S, Hao T, Sim I, Weng C. A Method for Analyzing Commonalities in Clinical Trial Target Populations. AMIA Annual Symp Proc 2014: In press.
10. Description of Laboratory Methodology to Measure Glycohemoglobin in NHANES [October 19, 2014]. Available from: http://wwwn. cdc. gov/nchs/nhanes/2011-2012/GHB-G. htm.
11. Dodd AH, Colby MS, Boye KS, Fahlman C, Kim S, Briefel RR. Treatment approach and HbA1c control among US adults with type 2 diabetes: NHANES 1999-2004. Curr Med Res Opin 2009: 25(7): 1605-13.
12. Key Concepts About Weighting in NHANES [October 2014]. Available from: http://www. cdc. gov/nchs/tutorials/NHANES/SurveyDesi gn/Weighting/OverviewKey. htm.
13. CDC. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Analytic Guidelines, 1999-2010 [September 20, 2014]. Available from: http://www. cdc. gov/nchs/data/series/sr-02/sr02-161. pdf.
14. Pooled Variance [October 19, 2014]. Available from: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Pooled-variance.
15. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1988: 83: 596-610.
16. Arterburn D, Flum DR, Westbrook EO, Fuller S, Shea M, Bock SN, et al. A population-based, shared decisionmaking approach to recruit for a randomized trial of bariatric surgery versus lifestyle for type 2 diabetes. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013: 9(6): 837-44.
17. Frangakis C. The calibration of treatment effects from clinical trials to target populations. Clin Trials 2009: 6(2): 136-40.
18. Hatfield J, Faunce GJ, Soames Job RF. Avoiding confusion surrounding the phrase "correlation does not imply causation. ". Teaching of Psychology 2006: 33: 49-51.
19. Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz HM. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials. gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 2012: 344: d7292.
20. Hudson KL, Collins FS. Sharing and Reporting the Results of Clinical Trials. JAMA 2015: 313(4): 355-6.
21. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, Eberhardt MS, Flegal KM, Engelgau MM, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U. S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care 2006: 29(6): 1263-8.