Targeted DNA methylation analysis by next-generation sequencing

Journal of Visualized Experiments

Volumn , Issue 96, 2015, Pages

  Masser, Dustin R ^a   Stanford, David R ^a   Freeman, Willard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; CpG; Cytosine; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Gene expression; Gene expression regulation; Issue 96; Molecular biology; Next generation sequencing

Indexed keywords

DNA; HYDROGEN SULFITE; SULFITE;

CHEMISTRY; CPG ISLAND; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

CPG ISLANDS; DNA; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SULFITES;

EID: 84946161473     PISSN: 1940087X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3791/52488     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hotchkiss, R. D. The quantitative separation of purines, pyrimidines, and nucleosides by paper chromatography. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 175 (1), 315-332 (1948).
2. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes & Development. 16 (1), 6-21, doi: 10.1101/gad.947102. (2002)
3. Smith, Z. D., & Meissner, A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nature reviews. Genetics. 14 (3), 204-220, doi: 10.1038/nrg3354. (2013)
4. Heard, E., & Martienssen, R. A. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell. 157 (1), 95-109, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.045. (2014)
5. Baylin, S. B. DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nature Clinical Practice. Oncology. 2 Suppl 1, S4-11, doi: 10.1038/ncponc0354. (2005)
6. Baylin, S. B. The cancer epigenome: its origins, contributions to tumorigenesis, and translational implications. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 9 (2), 64-65, doi: 10.1513/pats.201201-001MS. (2012)
7. Beck, S., & Rakyan, V. K. The methylome: approaches for global DNA methylation profiling. Trends in Genetics: TIG. 24 (5), 231-237, doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.01.006. (2008)
8. Laird, P. W. Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nature reviews. Genetics. 11 (3), 191-203, doi: 10.1038/nrg2732. (2010)
9. Mikeska, T. et al. Optimization of quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis using pyrosequencing and combined bisulfite restriction analysis. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics: JMD. 9(3), 368-381, doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060167. (2007)
10. Kreutz, M., Hochstein, N., Kaiser, J., Narz, F., & Peist, R. Pyrosequencing: powerful and quantitative sequencing technology. Current Protocols In Molecular Biology/edited by Frederick M. Ausubel. [et al.]. 104, Unit 7 15, doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0715s104. (2013)
11. Dikow, N. et al. Quantification of the methylation status of the PWS/AS imprinted region: comparison of two approaches based on bisulfite sequencing and methylation-sensitive MLPA. Molecular And Cellular Probes. 21 (3), 208-215, doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2006.12.002. (2007)
12. Parrish, R. R., Day, J. J., & Lubin, F. D. Direct bisulfite sequencing for examination of DNA methylation with gene and nucleotide resolution from brain tissues. Current Protocols In Neuroscience/editorial board, Jacqueline N. Crawley. [et al.]. Chapter 7, Unit 7 24, doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0724s60. (2012)
13. Shapiro, R., Servis, R.E. and Welcher, M. Reactions of uracil and cytosine derivatives with sodium bisulfite. A specific deamination method. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 92, 422-424 (1970).
14. Hayatsu, H., Wataya, Y., & Kazushige, K. The addition of sodium bisulfite to uracil and to cytosine. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 92 (3), 724-726 (1970).
15. Wang, R. Y., Gehrke, C. W., & Ehrlich, M. Comparison of bisulfite modification of 5-methyldeoxycytidine and deoxycytidine residues. Nucleic Acids Research. 8 (20), 4777-4790 (1980).
16. Masser, D. R., Berg, A. S., & Freeman, W. M. Focused, high accuracy 5-methylcytosine quantitation with base resolution by benchtop next-generation sequencing. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 6 (1), 33, doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-6-33. (2013)
17. Caruccio, N. Preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries using Nextera technology: simultaneous DNA fragmentation and adaptor tagging by in vitro transposition. Methods in Molecular Biology. 733, 241-255, doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-089-8_17. (2011)
18. Quail, M. A. et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics. 13, 341, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-341. (2012)
19. Adey, A., & Shendure, J. Ultra-low-input, tagmentation-based whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Genome Research. 22 (6), 1139-1143, doi: 10.1101/gr.136242.111. (2012)
20. Smallwood, S. A. et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nature Methods. 11 (8), 817-820, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3035. (2014)
21. Wang, J. et al. Universal endogenous gene controls for bisulphite conversion in analysis of plant DNA methylation. Plant Methods. 7, 39, doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-39. (2011)
22. Lister, R. et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 462 (7271), 315-322, doi: 10.1038/nature08514. (2009)
23. Ivanov, M. et al. In-solution hybrid capture of bisulfite-converted DNA for targeted bisulfite sequencing of 174 ADME genes. Nucleic Acids Research. 41 (6), e72, doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1467. (2013)
24. Booth, M. J. et al. Oxidative bisulfite sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nature Protocols. 8 (10), 1841-1851, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.115. (2013)