The case for delay-based congestion control

2003 IEEE 18th Annual Workshop on Computer Communications, CCW 2003 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 99-104

  Jin, Cheng ^a   Wei, D X ^a   Low, S H ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Availability; Communication system traffic control; Computer aided software engineering; Delay; Distributed algorithms; Distributed control; Feedback control; Internet; Stability; Supply and demand

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AVAILABILITY; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER CONTROL SYSTEMS; ECONOMICS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; INTERNET; PARALLEL ALGORITHMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TRAFFIC; CONGESTION WINDOW; DELAY; DELAY-BASED CONGESTION CONTROL; DISTRIBUTED CONTROL; END-TO-END CONGESTION CONTROL; EXPLICIT FEEDBACK; SUPPLY AND DEMAND;

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84946098276     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CCW.2003.1240796     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. C. Boutremans and J. Y. Le Boudec. A note on the fairness of TCP Vegas. In Proceedings of International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications, pages 163-170, February 2000.
2. Lawrence S. Brakmo and Larry L. Peterson. TCP Vegas: end-to-end congestion avoidance on a global Internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(8):1465-80, October 1995. http://cs.princeton.edu/nsg/papers/jsac-vegas.ps.
3. C. Casetti, M. Gerla, S. Mascolo, M. Sansadidi, and R. Wang. TCP Westwood: end-to-end congestion control for wired/wireless networks. Wireless Networks Journal, 8:467-479, 2002.
4. Hyojeong Choe and Steven H. Low. Stabilized Vegas. In Proc. of IEEE Infocom, April 2003. http://netlab.caltech.edu.
5. S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer. A comparison of equation-based and AIMD congestion control. Preprint, http://www.aciri.org/tfrc/, May 2000.
6. S. Floyd, M. Handley, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer. Equation-based congestion control for unicast applications. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'00, September 2000.
7. Sally Floyd. HighSpeed TCP for large congestion windows. Internet draft draft-floyd-tcp-highspeed-02.txt, work in progress, http://www.icir.org/floyd/hstcp.html, February 2003.
8. Janey Hoe. Improving the startup behavior of a congestion control scheme for tcp. In ACM Sigcomm'96, August 1996. http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm96/program.html.
9. C.V. Hollot, V. Misra, D. Towsley, and W.B. Gong. Analysis and design of controllers for AQM routers supporting TCP flows. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(6):945-959, 2002.
10. V. Jacobson. Congestion avoidance and control. Proceedings of SIGCOMM'88, ACM, August 1988. An updated version is available via ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/congavoid.ps.Z.
11. V. Jacobson, R. Braden, and D. Borman. TCP extensions for high performance. RFC 1323, ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1323.txt, May 1992.
12. Raj Jain. A delay-based approach for congestion avoidance in interconnected heterogeneous computer networks. ACM Computer Communication Review, 19(5):56-71, Oct. 1989.
13. Cheng Jin, David X. Wei, and Steven H. Low. TCP FAST: motivation, architecture, algorithms, performance. submitted for publication, netlab.caltech.edu/, July 2003.
14. D. Katabi, M. Handley, and C. Rohrs. Congestion control for high-bandwidth delay product networks. In Proc. ACM Sigcomm, August 2002.
15. Frank P. Kelly. Mathematical modelling of the Internet. In B. Engquist and W. Schmid, editors, Mathematics Unlimited - 2001 and Beyond, pages 685-702. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
16. Tom Kelly. Scalable TCP: Improving performance in highspeed wide area networks. Submitted for publication, http://www-lce.eng.cam.ac.uk/~ctk21/scalable/, December 2002.
17. T. V. Lakshman and Upamanyu Madhow. The performance of TCP/IP for networks with high bandwidth-delay products and random loss. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(3):336-350, June 1997. http://www.ece.ucsb.edu/Faculty/Madhow/Publications/ton97.ps.
18. S. H. Low, F. Paganini, J. Wang, and J. C. Doyle. Linear stability of TCP/RED and a scalable control. Computer Networks Journal, to appear,, 2003. http://netlab.caltech.edu.
19. Jim Martin, Arne Nilsson, and Injong Rhee. Delay-based congestion avoidance for TCP. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 11(3):356-369, June 2003.
20. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow. TCP Selective Acknowledgment Options. RFC 2018, ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2018.txt, October 1996.
21. Matthew Mathis, Jeffrey Semke, Jamshid Mahdavi, and Teunis Ott. The macroscopic behavior of the TCP congestion avoidance algorithm. ACM Computer Communication Review, 27(3), July 1997. http://www.psc.edu/networking/papers/model-ccr97.ps.
22. Fernando Paganini, John C. Doyle, and Steven H. Low. Scalable laws for stable network congestion control. In Proceedings of Conference on Decision and Control, December 2001. http://www.ee.ucla.edu/~paganini.
23. Fernando Paganini, Zhikui Wang, Steven H. Low, and John C. Doyle. A new TCP/AQM for stability and performance in fast networks. In Proc. of IEEE Infocom, April 2003. http://www.ee.ucla.edu/~paganini.
24. R. Shorten, D. Leith, J. Foy, and R. Kilduff. Analysis and design of congestion control in synchronised communication networks. In Proc. of 12th Yale Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems, May 2003. www.hamilton.ie/doug-leith.htm.
25. Z. Wang and J. Crowcroft. Eliminating periodic packet losses in the 4.3-Tahoe BSD TCP congestion control algorithm. ACM Computer Communications Review, April 1992.