Design science research as movementbetween individual and genericsituation-problem–solution spaces

Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 35-61

  Bider, Ilia ^a   Johannesson, Paul ^a   Perjons, Erik ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Business process; Design science; Information systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946076696     PISSN: 21954968     EISSN: 21954976     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., &Chatterjee, S.(2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–78
2. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., &Park, J.(2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105
3. Baskerville, R.L., Pries-Heje, J., &Venable, J.(2009). Soft design science methodology. DESRIST 2009, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 1–11
4. Anderson, J., Donnellan, B., &Hevner, A.(2011). Exploring the relationship between design science research and innovation: a case study of innovation at Chevron. Communications in Computer and Information Science. New York, NY: Springer
5. Neuman, W. L.(2006). Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson
6. Andersson, B., Bider, I., &Perjons, E.(2004). Integration of business process support with knowledge management—a practical perspective. Practical aspects of knowledge management (PAKM, 2004), LNCS3336, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 227–238
7. Andersson, T., Bider, I., &Svensson, R.(2005)Aligning people to business processes. Experience report. Software Process Improvement and Practice (SPIP), Vol. 10, No 4, pp. 403–413
8. Bider, I., & Perjons, E. (2006). Accessing an ongoing introduction of an IT system in operational practice (In Swedish), Inka project report, available at (2012-07-01): http://www.ibissoft.se/projects/inka/INKA_rapport_II.pdf
9. Bider, I.(2011). In search for a good theory: commuting between research and practice in business process domain. LNBIP, Vol. 81, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 16–30
10. Bider, I., Khomyakov, M., &Pushchinsky, E.(2000). Logic of change: semantics of object systems with active relations. Automated Software Engineering (ASE), 7(1), 9–37
11. Bider, I., &Khomyakov, M.(2003). New technology—great opportunities. How to exploit them. In: Filipe, J. (ed.), Enterprise information systems IV, Kluver, pp. 11–20
12. Lee, J. S., Pries-Heje, J., & Baserville, R. (2011). Theorizing in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011, LNCS6629, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–16
13. Simon, H.(1969). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
14. Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., &Lindgren, R.(2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56
15. Fischer, C., &Gregor, S.(2011). Forms of reasoning in the design science process. DESRIST 2011, LNCS6629, pp. 17–31
16. Khomyakov, M., &Bider, I.(2000). Achieving workflow flexibility through taming the chaos. OOIS 2000—6th international conference on object oriented information systems, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 85–92
17. Wieringa, R. J.(2009). Design science as nested problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology,Philadelphia: ACM, pp. 1–12
18. Bider, I., &Perjons, E.(2007). Effects from introduction of business process support systems and how they can be measured. In B. Pernici& J. A. Gulla (Eds.), CAiSE’07 workshop proceedings (pp. 369–377). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.