Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist: A guideline for the reporting of inciden ce and prevalence studies in neuroe pidemiology

Neurology

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 821-828

  Bennett, Derrick A ^a   Brayne, Carol ^c   Feigin, Valery L ^d   Barker Collo, Suzanne ^e   Brainin, Michael ^f   Davis, Daniel ^g   Gallo, Valentina ^h   Jetté, Nathalie ⁱ   Karch, André ^j   Kurtzke, John F ^k   Lavados, Pablo M ^l   Logroscino, Giancarlo ^m,n   Nagel, Gabriele ^m,o   Preux, Pierre Marie ^p   Rothwell, Peter M ^b   Svenson, Lawrence W ^q  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^f DANUBE UNIVERSITY KREMS   (Austria)

^g UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^h QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^j HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR INFECTION RESEARCH   (Germany)

^k GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l UNIVERSIDAD DEL DESARROLLO   (Chile)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

ⁿ University Aldo Moro ^*  (Italy)

^o UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^p UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES   (France)

^q UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DELPHI STUDY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INCOME; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MEDICAL RECORD; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELECONSULTATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSENSUS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

CHECKLIST; COHORT STUDIES; CONSENSUS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; RESEARCH REPORT;

EID: 84946073942     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001866     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One 2015;10: e0116820.
2. Rao D, Choi S, Victorson D, et al. Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI). Qual Life Res 2009;18:585-595.
3. Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, et al. GBD 2010: a multi-investigator collaboration for global comparative descriptive epidemiology. Lancet 2013;380:2055-2058.
4. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the "common" neurologic disorders? Neurology 2007;68:326-337.
5. Albert SM. Projecting neurologic disease burden: difficult but critical. Neurology 2007;68:322-323.
6. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;380: 2163-2196.
7. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
8. Feigin V, Kurtzke JF, Korczyn A, Beghi E, Brown A. Bridging the gap between experimental and non-experimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately-between neuroepidemiological research and practice: round table discussion at the First International Congress on Clinical Neurology and Epidemiology. Neuroepidemiology 2009;33:296-304.
9. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2010;1: 100-107.
10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
11. Oermann MH. SQUIRE Guidelines for reporting improvement studies in healthcare: implications for nursing publications. J Nurs Care Qual 2009;24:91-95.
12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335:806-808.
13. Chin JH, Vora N. The global burden of neurologic diseases. Neurology 2014;83:349-351.
14. Evans C, Beland SG, Kulaga S, et al. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the Americas: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology 2013;40:195-210.
15. Aarsland D, Zaccai J, Brayne C. A systematic review of prevalence studies of dementia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2005;20:1255-1263.
16. Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, et al. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology 2007;68:384-386.
17. GBD 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;385:117-171.
18. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000217.
19. Steurer J. The Delphi method: an efficient procedure to generate knowledge. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:959-961.
20. Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ 2012;344:e4178.
21. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman D, Schulz K, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Syst Rev 2012;1:60.
22. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c869.
23. Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 2008;371:1149-1150.
24. Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies. Maturitas 2009;63:4-6.
25. Cialkowska M, Adamowski T, Piotrowski P, Kiejna A. What is the Delphi method? Strengths and shortcomings [in Polish]. Psychiatr Pol 2008;42:5-15.
26. Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, et al. GBD 2010: design, definitions, and metrics. Lancet 2013;380:2063-2066.