Crawling and Gliding: A Computational Model for Shape-Driven Cell Migration

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Niculescu, Ioana ^a   Textor, Johannes ^a   de Boer, Rob J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOLOGY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HISTOLOGY; POTTS MODEL; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TISSUE;

CELL MIGRATION; CELL TYPES; CELLULAR POTTS MODELS; COMPLEX PROCESSES; COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; EXTRACELLULAR; FEEDBACK MECHANISMS; MULTIPLE LEVELS; SIMPLE++; STOCHASTICS;

CELLS;

ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR POTTS MODEL; CHEMOTAXIS; CORNEA CELL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; T LYMPHOCYTE; AMOEBA (LIFE CYCLE STAGE); ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOTION; CELL SIZE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR;

ACTINS; AMOEBA; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SIZE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR MOTOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84946069925     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004280     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Friedl P, Wolf K, Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2010;188(1):11–19. Available from: http://jcb.rupress.org/content/188/1/11.abstract. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200909003 19951899
2. Keren K, Pincus Z, Allen GM, Barnhart EL, Marriott G, Mogilner A, et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature. 2008 May;453(7194):475–480. doi: 10.1038/nature06952 18497816
3. Lee J, Ishihara A, Theriot J, Jacobson K, Principles of locomotion for simple-shaped cells. Nature. 1993 Mar;362(6416):167–171. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/362167a0. 8450887
4. Lämmermann T, Sixt M, Mechanical modes of ‘amoeboid’ cell migration. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2009;21(5):636–644. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955067409001148. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.003 19523798
5. Gebhardt T, Wakim LM, Eidsmo L, Reading PC, Heath WR, Carbone FR, Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus. Nat Immunol. 2009 May;10(5):524–530. doi: 10.1038/ni.1718 19305395
6. Gebhardt T, Whitney PG, Zaid A, Mackay LK, Brooks AG, Heath WR, et al. Different patterns of peripheral migration by memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Nature. 2011 Sep;477(7363):216–219. doi: 10.1038/nature10339 21841802
7. Ariotti S, Beltman JB, Chodaczek G, Hoekstra ME, van Beek AE, Gomez-Eerland R, et al. Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells continuously patrol skin epithelia to quickly recognize local antigen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(48):19739–19744. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/109/48/19739.abstract. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208927109
8. Satulovsky J, Lui R, li Wang Y, Exploring the Control Circuit of Cell Migration by Mathematical Modeling. Biophysical Journal. 2008;94(9):3671—3683. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349508704430. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.117002 18199677
9. Shao D, Rappel WJ, Levine H, A computational model for cell morphodynamics. Physical review letters. 2010 Sep;105(10):108104–108104. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048783/. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.108104 20867552
10. Shao D, Levine H, Rappel WJ, Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(18):6851–6856. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/109/18/6851.abstract. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203252109
11. Ziebert F, Swaminathan S, Aranson IS, Model for self-polarization and motility of keratocyte fragments. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2012;9(70):1084–1092. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0433
12. Wolgemuth C, Stajic J, Mogilner A, Redundant Mechanisms for Stable Cell Locomotion Revealed by Minimal Models. Biophysical Journal. 2011 Jun;101(3):545–553. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145291/. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.06.032 21806922
13. Marée AFM, Jilkine A, Dawes A, Grieneisen V, Edelstein-Keshet L, Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2006;68(5):1169–1211. doi: 10.1007/s11538-006-9131-7 16794915
14. Nishimura SI, Ueda M, Sasai M, Cortical Factor Feedback Model for Cellular Locomotion and Cytofission. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 March;5(3):e1000310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000310 19282961
15. Parent CA, Devreotes PN, A Cell’s Sense of Direction. Science. 1999;284(5415):765–770. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5415.765 10221901
16. Levchenko A, Iglesias PA, Models of Eukaryotic Gradient Sensing: Application to Chemotaxis of Amoebae and Neutrophils. Biophysical Journal. 2002;82(1):50—63. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75373-3 11751295
17. Xiong Y, Huang CH, Iglesias PA, Devreotes PN, Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(40):17079–17086. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/40/17079.abstract. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011271107
18. Goehring NW, Grill SW, Cell polarity: mechanochemical patterning. Trends in Cell Biology. 2013;23(2):72—80. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962892412002012. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.10.009 23182746
19. Merks RMH, Brodsky SV, Goligorksy MS, Newman SA, Glazier JA, Cell elongation is key to in silico replication of in vitro vasculogenesis and subsequent remodeling. Developmental Biology. 2006;289(1):44—54. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160605007098. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.10.003 16325173
20. Beltman JB, Marée AFM, de Boer RJ, Spatial modelling of brief and long interactions between T cells and dendritic cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007 Apr;85(4):306–314. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100054 17420768
21. Pollard TD, Borisy GG, Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments. Cell. 2003;112(4):453—465. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X 12600310
22. Iglesias PA, Devreotes PN, Navigating through models of chemotaxis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2008;20(1):35—40. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955067407001792. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.11.011 18207721
23. Wedlich-Soldner R, Li R, Spontaneous cell polarization: undermining determinism. Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Apr;5(4):267–270. doi: 10.1038/ncb0403-267 12669070
24. Atilgan E, Wirtz D, Sun SX, Morphology of the Lamellipodium and Organization of Actin Filaments at the Leading Edge of Crawling Cells. Biophysical Journal. 2005;89(5):3589—3602. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349505729982. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.065383 16085776
25. Kerber ML, Jacobs DT, Campagnola L, Dunn BD, Yin T, Sousa AD, et al. A Novel Form of Motility in Filopodia Revealed by Imaging Myosin-X at the Single-Molecule Level. Current Biology. 2009;19(11):967—973. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982209009270. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.067 19398338
26. Mogilner A, Keren K, The Shape of Motile Cells. Current Biology. 2009;19(17):R762—R771. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982209013293. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.053 19906578
27. Neilson MP, Veltman DM, van Haastert PJM, Webb SD, Mackenzie JA, Insall RH, Chemotaxis: A Feedback-Based Computational Model Robustly Predicts Multiple Aspects of Real Cell Behaviour. PLoS Biol. 2011 05;9(5):e1000618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000618 21610858
28. Nishimura SI, Ueda M, Sasai M, Non-Brownian dynamics and strategy of amoeboid cell locomotion. Phys Rev E. 2012 Apr;85:041909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.041909
29. Yang L, Effler JC, Kutscher BL, Sullivan SE, Robinson DN, Iglesias PA, Modeling cellular deformations using the level set formalism. BMC Systems Biology. 2008 Jul;2(1):68+. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-2-68 18652669
30. Hecht I, Skoge ML, Charest PG, Ben-Jacob E, Firtel RA, Loomis WF, et al. Activated Membrane Patches Guide Chemotactic Cell Motility. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 06;7(6):e1002044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002044 21738453
31. Van Haastert PJM, Devreotes PN, Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Aug;5(8):626–634. doi: 10.1038/nrm1435 15366706
32. Marée AFM, Grieneisen V, Hogeweg P, Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ, Rejniak KA, The Cellular Potts Model and Biophysical Properties of Cells, Tissues and Morphogenesis. In: Single-Cell-Based Models in Biology and Medicine. Mathematics and Biosciences in Interaction. Birkhäuser Basel; 2007. p. 107–136. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8123-3_5.
33. Fisher PR, Merkl R, Gerisch G, Quantitative analysis of cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum by using an image processing system and a novel chemotaxis chamber providing stationary chemical gradients. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1989;108(3):973–984. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.973 2537839
34. Tweedy L, Meier B, Stephan J, Heinrich D, Endres RG, Distinct cell shapes determine accurate chemotaxis. Sci Rep. 2013 Sep;3:–. doi: 10.1038/srep02606 24008441
35. Szabo B, Szöllösi GJ, Gönci B, Jurányi Z, Selmeczi D, Vicsek T, Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: Experiment and model. Phys Rev E. 2006 Dec;74:061908. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061908
36. Beltman JB, Marée AFM, Lynch JN, Miller MJ, de Boer RJ, Lymph node topology dictates T cell migration behavior. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2007;204(4):771–780. Available from: http://jem.rupress.org/content/204/4/771.abstract. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061278 17389236
37. Anderson AR, Chaplain MA, Rejniak KA, Single-cell-based models in biology and medicine. Springer; 2007.
38. Graner F, Glazier JA, Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Phys Rev Lett. 1992 Sep;69:2013–2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2013 10046374
39. Käfer J, Hayashi T, Marée AFM, Carthew RW, Graner F, Cell adhesion and cortex contractility determine cell patterning in the Drosophilaretina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(47):18549–18554. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/104/47/18549.abstract. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704235104
40. Zajac M, Jones GL, Glazier JA, Simulating convergent extension by way of anisotropic differential adhesion. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2003;222(2):247—259. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00033-X 12727459
41. Berg HC, Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press; 1993.
42. Gail MH, Boone CW, The Locomotion of Mouse Fibroblasts in Tissue Culture. Biophysical Journal. 1970;10(10):980—993. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86347-0 5531614
43. Selmeczi D, Mosler S, Hagedorn PH, Larsen NB, Flyvbjerg H, Cell Motility as Persistent Random Motion: Theories from Experiments. Biophysical Journal. 2005;89(2):912—931. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349505727430. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.061150 15951372