메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 189-191

Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews

Author keywords

Databases, bibliographic; Information services; MEDLINE; Meta analysis; PubMed; Review

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DECISION MAKING; ENDOCRINE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; LITERATURE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); UTILIZATION;

EID: 84945970968     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.005     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (3)

References (6)
  • 1
    • 18344389065 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews need systematic searchers
    • Jan
    • McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. J Med Lib Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):74-80.
    • (2005) J Med Lib Assoc , vol.93 , Issue.1 , pp. 74-80
    • McGowan, J.1    Sampson, M.2
  • 2
    • 84907163799 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: A review of searches used in systematic reviews
    • Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR, Anderson PF. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23;2:115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-115.
    • (2013) Syst Rev , vol.2 , pp. 115
    • Bramer, W.M.1    Giustini, D.2    Kramer, B.M.R.3    Anderson, P.F.4
  • 4
    • 84872020049 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews
    • Jan 9
    • Gehanno JF, Rollin L, Darmoni S. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-7.
    • (2013) BMC Med Inform Decis Mak , vol.13 , pp. 7
    • Gehanno, J.F.1    Rollin, L.2    Darmoni, S.3
  • 5
    • 84927920320 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional analysis
    • Oct 27
    • Jones CW, Keil LG, Weaver MA, Platts-Mills TF. Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis. Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 27;3:126. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-126.
    • (2014) Syst Rev , vol.3 , pp. 126
    • Jones, C.W.1    Keil, L.G.2    Weaver, M.A.3    Platts-Mills, T.F.4
  • 6
    • 11844258821 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: Analytical survey
    • Jan 8 Epub 2004 Dec 24
    • Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005. Jan 8;330(7482):68. Epub 2004 Dec 24.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.330 , Issue.7482 , pp. 68
    • Montori, V.M.1    Wilczynski, N.L.2    Morgan, D.3    Haynes, R.B.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.