Restoration of impaired ecosystems: An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure? Introduction, overview, and key messages from a SETAC-SER workshop

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 247-252

  Farag, Aïda M ^a   Hull, Ruth N ^b   Clements, Will H ^c   Glomb, Steve ^d   Larson, Diane L ^a   Stahl, Ralph ^e   Stauber, Jenny ^f  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b Intrinsik Environmental Sciences Inc   (Canada)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d US Department of the Interior   (United States)

^e DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^f CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contaminated sites; Remediation; Restoration; Workshop overview

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY;

ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION;

EID: 84945969372     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1687     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. nd ed. Washington (DC): BBOP. [cited 2014 November 14] Available from: http://bbop.forest-trends.org/guidelines/Updated_Glossary
2. Basche AD, Roesch-McNally GE, Pease LA, Eidson CD, Bou Lahdou G, Dunbar MW, Frank TJ, Frescoln L, Gu L, Nagelkirk R, et al. 2014. Challenges and opportunities in transdisciplinary science: The experience of next generation scientists in an agriculture and climate research collaboration. J Soil Wat Conserv 69:176A-179A.
3. Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME. 1984. Perturbation experiments in community ecology: Theory and practice. Ecology 65:1-13.
4. Clewell AF, Aronson J. 2013. Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values and Structure of an Emerging Profession. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): Island Press. 303 pp.
5. Farag AM, Hull RN, Clements WH, Glomb S, Larson DL, Stahl R, Stauber J. 2015. Restoration of impaired ecosystems: An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure? Introduction, overview, and key messages from a SETAC-SER workshop. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:247-252.
6. Hooper MJ, Glomb SJ, Harper DD, Hoelzle TB, McIntosh LM, Mulligan DR. 2016. Integrated risk and recovery monitoring of ecosystem restorations on contaminated sites. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:284-295.
7. Hull RN, Luoma SN, Bayne BA, Iliff J, Larkin DJ, Paschke MW, Victor SL, Ward SE. 2015. Opportunities and challenges of integrating ecological restoration into assessment and management of contaminated ecosystems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:296-305.
8. Kapustka LA, Bowers K, Isanhart J, Martinez-Garza C, Finger S, Stahl R, Stauber J. 2015. Coordinating ecological restoration options analysis and risk assessment to improve environmental outcomes. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:253-263.
9. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington (DC): Island Press. [2014 May 12]. Available from: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Framework.aspx
10. Pooley SP, Mendelsohn JA, Milner-Gulland EJ. 2013. Hunting down the chimera of multiple disciplinarity in conservation science. Conserv Biol 28:22-32.
11. Rohr JR, Farag AM, Cadotte MW, Clements WH, Smith JR, Ulrich CP, Woods R. 2015. Transforming ecosystems: When, where, and how to restore contaminated sites. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:273-283.
12. [SER]. Society for Ecological Restoration. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. (Version 2: October 2004). Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group. [cited 2014 May 12]. Available from: www.ser.org; and Tucson (AZ): Society for Ecological Restoration International.
13. Truhaut R. 1977. Ecotoxicology: objectives, principles and perspectives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1:151-173.
14. [USGPO] United States Government Printing Office. 2014. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Title 15, Part 990-Natural Resource Damage Assessments, Subpart 30-Definitions. Current as of May 8, 2014. [Cited 2014 May 12].
15. [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. USEPA Remedial Technology Fact Sheet. EPA/600/F-98/021. May 1999. [cited 2014 June 4]. Available from: http://nepis.epa.gov/
16. [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Ecological Revitalization and Attractive Nuisance Issues. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. EPA 542-F-06-003. June 2007. [cited 2014 May 12]. Available from: http://epa.gov/tio/download/remed/542f06003.pdf
17. [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Glossary. [cited 2014 May 12]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/reforms/glossary.htm#r
18. [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2012a. Waste and Cleanup Risk Assessment Glossary. Last updated: December 24, 2012. [cited 2014 May 12]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/glossary.htm
19. USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2012b. A Citizen's Guide to Monitored Natural Attenuation. EPA 542-F-12-014. [cited 2014 September 11]. Available from: http://www.clu-in.org/download/Citizens/a_citizens_guide_to_monitored_natural_attenuation.pdf
20. Wagner AM, Larson DL, DalSoglio JA, Harris JA, Labus P, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Skrabis KE. 2015. A framework for establishing restoration goals for contaminated ecosystems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12:264-272.