Mobile phone-based questionnaire for assessing 3 months modified Rankin score after acute stroke: A pilot study

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Volumn 8, Issue 6_suppl_3, 2015, Pages S125-S130

  Cooray, Charith ^a   Matusevicius, Marius ^a   Wahlgren, Nils ^a   Ahmed, Niaz ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

cell phones; outcomes research; prediction; questionnaires; stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CAREGIVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANKIN SCALE; STROKE PATIENT; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; ACUTE DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE APPLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF EVALUATION; STROKE; SWEDEN; TIME FACTOR;

ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; CELL PHONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STROKE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84945947630     PISSN: 19417713     EISSN: 19417705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002055     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Banks JL, Marotta CA, Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke 2007 38 1091 1096. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
2. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT, Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000 31 1429 1438
3. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR, Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke 2009 4 200 205. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00271.x
4. Saver JL, Filip B, Hamilton S, Yanes A, Craig S, Cho M, Conwit R, Starkman S, FAST-MAG Investigators and Coordinators Improving the reliability of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice: the Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA). Stroke 2010 41 992 995. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571364
5. Savio K, Pietra GL, Oddone E, Reggiani M, Leone MA, Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale applied by telephone. Neurol Int 2013 5 e2. doi: 10.4081/ni.2013.e2
6. Newcommon NJ, Green TL, Haley E, Cooke T, Hill MD, Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2003 34 377 378; author reply 377
7. Dennis M, Mead G, Doubal F, Graham C, Determining the modified Rankin score after stroke by postal and telephone questionnaires. Stroke 2012 43 851 853. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639708
8. Stomberg MW, Platon B, Widén A, Wallner I, Karlsson O, Health information: what can mobile phone assessments add? Perspect Health Inf Manag 2012 9 1 10
9. Lundström S, Is it reliable to use cellular phones for symptom assessment in palliative care? Report on a study in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med 2009 12 1087. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0207
10. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR, Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: a systematic review. Stroke 2009 40 3393 3395. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.557256
11. Landis JR, Koch GG, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977 33 159 174
12. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Grant M, Baird T, Schulz UG, Muir KW, Bone I, Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2002 33 2243 2246
13. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J, Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988 19 604 607
14. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp HB, Hacke W, DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007 6 215 222. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70036-4
15. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJ, van Walderveen MA, Staals J, Hofmeijer J, van Oostayen JA, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Boiten J, Brouwer PA, Emmer BJ, de Bruijn SF, van Dijk LC, Kappelle LJ, Lo RH, van Dijk EJ, de Vries J, de Kort PL, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg JS, van Hasselt BA, Aerden LA, Dallinga RJ, Visser MC, Bot JC, Vroomen PC, Eshghi O, Schreuder TH, Heijboer RJ, Keizer K, Tielbeek AV, den Hertog HM, Gerrits DG, van den Berg-Vos RM, Karas GB, Steyerberg EW, Flach HZ, Marquering HA, Sprengers ME, Jenniskens SF, Beenen LF, van den Berg R, Koudstaal PJ, van Zwam WH, Roos YB, van der Lugt A, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, MR CLEAN Investigators A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015 372 11 20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587
16. Janssen PM, Visser NA, Dorhout Mees SM, Klijn CJ, Algra A, Rinkel GJ, Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010 29 137 139. doi: 10.1159/000262309