Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic-Their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use

Land Use Policy

Volumn 50, Issue , 2016, Pages 390-398

  Sisak, Ludek ^a   Riedl, Marcel ^a   Dudik, Roman ^a  

^a CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech Republic; Non timber forest products; Socio economic importance; Trends

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY POLICY; LAND USE; NONTIMBER FOREST PRODUCT; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TREND ANALYSIS;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

BASIDIOMYCOTA;

EID: 84945943037     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis 2002, 702 pp. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
2. Alexander C.J., Pilz D., Weber N.S., Brown E., Rockwell V.A. Mushrooms, trees, and money: value estimates of commercial mushrooms and timber in the Pacific Northwest. Environ. Manage. 2002, 30:129-141.
3. Barszcz A. An overview of the socio-economics of non-wood forest products in Poland. Non-wood Forest Products and Poverty Mitigation: Concepts, Overviews and Cases 2004, 1-20. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research notes 166. C. Lacuna-Richman, M. Turtiainen, A. Barszcz (Eds.).
4. Berrens R.P., Bohara A.K., Jenkins-Smith H.C., Silva C.L., Weimer D.L. Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2004, 47:331-363.
5. Bonet J.A., Pukkala T., Fischer C., Palahí M., Martínez de Aragón J., Colinas C. Empirical models for predicting the production of wild mushrooms in Scots pine forests in the Central Pyrenees. Ann. For. Sci. 2008, 65:1-9.
6. Bonet J.A., Palahi M., Colinas C., Pukkala T., Fischer C.R., Miina J., Martínez de Aragón J. Modelling the production and species richness of wild mushrooms in pine forests of Central Pyrenees in north-eastern Spain. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40:347-356.
7. Brown A.M. A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using a microsoft excel spreadsheet. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2001, 65:191-200.
8. Croitoru L. Valuing the non-timber forest products in the Mediterranean region. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:768-775.
9. Czech, 1995. Zákon o lesích a o změně a doplnění některých zákonů č. 289. Sbírka zákonů České republiky, částka 76, ročník 1995.
10. Emery M., O'Halek S.L. Brief overview of historical non-timber forest product use in the U.S. Pacific Northwest and Upper Midwest. J. Sustain. For. 2001, 13:25-30.
11. European Commission Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A New Eu Forest Strategy: for Forests and the Forest-based Sector. Com 659 final 2013, European Commission, Brussels, 17 pp.
12. Friendly M. Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1994, 89:190-200.
13. Glück P. Policy means for ensuring the full value of forests to society. Land Use Policy 2000, 17:177-185.
14. Gram S. Economic valuation of special forest products: an assessment of methodological shortcomings. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 36:109-117.
15. Gregory G.R. Forest Resource Economics 1972, Ronald Press Co., New York, 48 pp.
16. Hartigan J.A., Kleiner B. Mosaics for contingency tables. Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on the Interface 1981, 268-273. Springer, New York. W.F. Eddy (Ed.).
17. Hudson D., Seah L.H., Hite D., Haab T. Telephone presurveys, self-selection, and non-response bias to mail and internet surveys in economic research. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2004, 11:237-240.
18. Hung H.M.J., O'Neill R.T., Bauer P., Kohne K. The behavior of the P-value when the alternative hypothesis is true. Biometrics 1997, 53:11-22.
19. Jarský V., Pulkrab K. Analysis of EU support for managed succession of agricultural land in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy 2013, 35:237-246.
20. Jöbstl H.A. Innovations in forestry accounting-integration of forest assets and non-market environmental benefits into management and national accounting and reporting. Aust. J. For. Sci. 2009, 126:1-4.
21. Kilchling P., Hansmann R., Seeland K. Demand for non-timber forest products: surveys of urban consumers and sellers in Switzerland. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11:294-300.
22. Kovalčík M. Value of forest berries and mushrooms picking in Slovakia as an ecosystem service of mountain forests. Beskydy 2014, 7:39-46.
23. Ladenburg J., Olsen S.B. Gender specific starting point bias in choice experiments: evidence from an empirical study. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2008, 56:275-285.
24. Merlo M., Croitoru L. Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value 2005, CABI International, Wallingford UK/Cambridge MA, 406 pp.
25. MZe Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2014, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (MZe), Prague, 200 pp.
26. Pettenella D., Secco L., Maso D. NWFP&S marketing: lessons learned and new development paths from case studies in some European Countries. Small-scale For. 2007, 6:373-390.
27. Polevshchikova N. An overview of the poverty and NWFP situation in the Republic of Karelia, Russia. Non-wood Forest Products and Poverty Mitigation: Concepts, Overviews and Cases 2004, 37-47. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research notes 166, 2005. C. Lacuna-Richman, M. Turtiainen, A. Barszcz (Eds.).
28. R Core Team, 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
29. Saastamoinen O., Lacuna-Richman C., Vaara M. Is the use of forest berries for poverty mitigation a relevant issue in an affluent society such as Finland?. Non-wood Forest Products and Poverty Mitigation: Concepts, Overviews and Cases 2004, 59-72. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research notes 166, 2005. C. Lacuna-Richman, M. Turtiainen, A. Barszcz (Eds.).
30. Tsuge T., Washida T. Economic valuation of the Seto Inland Sea by using an internet CV survey. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2003, 47:230-236.
31. Venn T.J., Calkin D.E. Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20:327-339.
32. Wainer H., Velleman P. Statistical graphics: Mapping the pathways of science. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52:305-335.
33. UK Government, 2007. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Environment Statistics and Indicators Division and BMRB. Social Research, Survey of Public Attitudes and Behaviours toward the Environment, 2007 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], November 2007. SN. 5741, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5741-1.