Meeting the Needs of ELLs: Acknowledging the Schism Between ESL/Bilingual and Mainstream Teachers and Illustrating That Problem’s Remedy1

Inclusive Pedagogy for English Language Learners: A Handbook of Research-Informed Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 305-316

  Hamann, Edmund T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE MONTERREY   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945688855     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315092751-20     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Abedi, J. (2005). Issues and consequences for English language learners. In J. L. Herman and E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement:The 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2 (pp. 175-198). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2. August, D., and Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language minority school children:A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Cadeiro-Kaplan, K. (2004). The literacy curriculum and bilingual education. New York: Peter Lang.
4. Callahan, R. and Gándara, P. (2004). On nobody’s agenda: Improving English-language learners’ access to higher education. In M. Sadowski (Ed.), Teaching immigrant and second language students:Strategies for success (pp. 107-127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
5. Coady, M., Hamann, E. T., Harrington, M., Pacheco, M., Pho, S., and Yedlin, J. (2003). Claiming opportunities: A handbook for improving education for English language learners through comprehensive school reform. Providence, RI: Education Alliance at Brown University.
6. Crawford, J. (2004). No Child Left Behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. Paper presented at the Center on Educational Policy’s Forum on Ideas to Improve the NCLB Accountability Provisions for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners, September 14, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.cep-dc.org/pubs/Forum14September2004/CrawfordPaper.pdf.
7. Dentler, R. A., and Hafner, A. L. (1997). Hosting newcomers: Structuring educational opportunities for immigrant children. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Deschenes, S., Cuban, L., and Tyack, D. (2001). Mismatch: Historical perspectives on schools and students who don’t fit them. Teachers College Record, 103, 525-547.
9. Erickson, F. (1984). What makes school ethnography “ethnographic”? Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 15, 51-66.
10. Ernst, G., Statzner, E., and Trueba, H. T. (Eds.). (1994). Theme issue: Alternative visions of schooling:Success stories in minority settings. Anthropology and Educational Quarterly, 25(3), 200-207.
11. Gándara, P., Rumberger, R., Maxwell-Jolly, J., and Callahan, R. (2003, October 7). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/.
12. Grey, M. A. (1991). The context for marginal secondary ESL programs: Contributing factors and the need for further research. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 9, 75-89.
13. Hamann, E. T. (2003). The educational welcome of Latinos in the New South. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Harklau, L. (1994a). Tracking and linguistic minority students: Consequences of ability grouping for second language learners. Linguistics and Education, 6(3), 217-244.
15. Harklau, L. (1994b). “Jumping Tracks”: How language-minority students negotiate evaluations of ability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 25(3), 347-363.
16. Harklau, L., Losey, K. M, and Siegal, M. (Eds.). (1999). Generation 1.5 meets college composition: Issues in the teaching of writing to U.S. educated learners of ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Keyes, J. (1999). Educators’ attitudes towards language-minority education in one public school system in the southeastern United States. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
18. Kindler, A. (2002). Survey of the States’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services, 2000-2001 summary report. Washington, DC: NCELA. Available at: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/reports/seareports/0001/sea0001.pdf.
19. LaCelle-Peterson, M., and Rivera, C. (1994). Is it real for all kids? A framework for equitable assessment policies for English language learners. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 55-75.
20. Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563, 94 S.Ct. 786, 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974).
21. Lucas, T. (1997). Into, through, and beyond secondary school: Critical transitions for immigrant youth. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems Co.
22. Lucas, T., Henze, R., and Donato, R. (1990). Promoting the success of Latino language-minority students: An exploratory study of six high schools. Harvard Education Review, 60(3), 315-40.
23. McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171-178.
24. Mehan, H., Villanueva, I., Hubbard, L., and Lintz, A. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Meltzer, J., and Hamann, E. T. (2004). Meeting the needs of adolescent English language learners for literacy development and content area learning, Part one: Focus on motivation and engagement. Providence, RI: Education Alliance at Brown University.
26. Meltzer, J., and Hamann, E. T. (2005). Meeting the needs of adolescent English language learners for literacy development and content area learning, Part two: Focus on classroom teaching and learning strategies. Providence, RI: Education Alliance at Brown University.
27. Miramontes, O. B., Nadeau, A., Commins, N. L., and Garcia, E. (1997). Restructuring schools for linguistic diversity: Linking decision making to effective programs. NY: Teachers College Press.
28. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1997). The condition of education 1997, Supplemental and Standard Error Tables: Supplemental Table 4-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=97988.
29. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Center for School and District Improvement. (2004). English language learner (ELL) programs at the secondary level in relation to student performance. Portland, OR: Author.
30. Pugach, M. (1998). On the border of opportunity: Education, community, and language at the U.S.-Mexico line. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
31. Romo, H. D., and Falbo, T. (1996). Latino high school graduation: Defying the odds. Austin: University of Texas Press.
32. Ruiz-de-Velasco, J., (2005). Performance-based school reforms and the federal role in helping schools that serve language-minority students. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind:How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 33-55). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. Schecter, S. R., and Cummins, J. (Eds.). (2003). Multilingual education in practice: Using diversity as a resource. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
34. Spillane, J., Reiser, B., and Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing policy implementation research. Review of Educational Research 72(3), 387-431.
35. Stritikus, T., and Garcia, E. (2003). The role of theory and policy in the educational treatment of language minority students: Competitive structures in California. Education Policy Analysis Archive 11(26). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n26/.
36. Suárez-Orozco, C., and Suárez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Walqui, A. (2000). Access and engagement: Program design and instructional approaches for immigrant students in secondary school. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems Co.
38. Wortham, S., Murillo, E. and Hamann, E. T. (Eds.) (2002). Education in the new Latino diaspora: Policy and the politics of identity. Westport, CT: Ablex.
39. Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M. L., and Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities, volume 1A: Research report. Development Associates, Inc. Available at: http://www.devassoc.com/LEPdoclist.html.