Assessing the practices of population-based birth defects surveillance programs using the CDC strategic framework, 2012

Public Health Reports

Volumn 130, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 722-730

  Mai, Cara T ^a   Correa, Adolfo ^b   Kirby, Russell S ^c   Rosenberg, Deborah ^d   Petros, Michael ^d   Fagen, Michael C ^e  

^a NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE FINDING; CHILD; CHILD CARE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; POSTNATAL CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE MANPOWER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARDS;

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; DATA COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MONITORING; HEALTH MANPOWER; HUMANS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84945556211     PISSN: 00333549     EISSN: 14682877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003335491513000621     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). CDC’s vision for public health surveillance in the 21st century. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61(Suppl):1-44
2. Mai CT, Kirby RS, Correa A, Rosenberg D, Petros M, Fagen M. Public health practice of population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract 2015 (Epub ahead of print).
3. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS®: Version 9.3 for Windows. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc.; 2011
4. Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2004
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. State birth defects surveillance program directory. Birth Defects Res A 2012;94:S121-69
6. Luminant Software, Inc. AudioNote®: Version 4.3.6. Sunnyvale (CA): Luminant Software, Inc.; 2015
7. Scientific Software Development. ATLAS.ti®: Version 5.0 for Windows. Berlin: Scientific Software Development; 2004
8. Hall HI, Correa A, Yoon PW, Braden CR. Lexicon, definitions, and conceptual framework for public health surveillance. MMWR Surveill Summ 2012;61(Suppl):10-4
9. Correa A, Kirby RS. An expanded public health role for birth defects surveillance. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010;88:1004-7
10. Correa A, Cragan JD, Kucik JE, Alverson CJ, Gilboa SM, Balakrishnan R, et al. Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 40th anniversary edition surveillance report, reporting birth defects surveillance data 1968–2003. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2007;79:65-93
11. Moore MH. Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1995
12. Feldkamp M, MacLeod L, Young L, Lecheminant K, Carey JC. The methodology of the Utah Birth Defect Network: congenital heart defects as an illustration. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005;73:693-9
13. Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Kennedy S, Block S, Bailey M, Correia JA, et al. A comparison of two surveillance strategies for selected birth defects in Florida. Public Health Rep 2012;127:391-400
14. Bradley CJ, Penberthy L, Devers KJ, Holden DJ. Health services research and data linkages: issues, methods, and directions for the future. Health Serv Res 2010;45(5 Pt 2):1468-88
15. Hsiao CJ, Jha AK, King J, Patel V, Furukawa MF, Mostashari F. Office-based physicians are responding to incentives and assistance by adopting and using electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:1470-7
16. Drehobl PA, Roush SW, Stover BH, Koo D. Public health surveillance workforce of the future. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61(03):25-9.