Challenges of computational verification in social multimedia

WWW 2014 Companion - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 743-748

  Boididou, Christina ^a   Papadopoulos, Symeon ^a   Kompatsiaris, Yiannis ^a   Schifferes, Steve ^b   Newman, Nic ^b  

^a CERTH ITI ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Credibility; Fake images; Social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

CREDIBILITY; FAKE IMAGES; MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS; PREDICTION ACCURACY; SOCIAL MEDIA; TRAINING AND TESTING; TWITTER; VERIFICATION FRAMEWORK;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84945547013     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2567948.2579323     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. F. Benevenuto, G. Magno, T. Rodrigues, and V. Almeida. Detecting spammers on twitter. In Collaboration, Electronic messaging, Anti-abuse and Spam conference (CEAS), volume 6, 2010.
2. K. R. Canini, B. Suh, and P. L. Pirolli. Finding credible information sources in social networks based on content and social structure. In IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pages 1-8. IEEE, 2011.
3. C. Castillo, D. Donato, A. Gionis, V. Murdock, and F. Silvestri. Know your neighbors: Web spam detection using the web topology. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference, pages 423-430. ACM, 2007.
4. C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 675-684. ACM, 2011.
5. F. Cheong and C. Cheong. Social media data mining: A social network analysis of tweets during the 2010-2011 australian floods. In PACIS, page 46, 2011.
6. A. Gupta and P. Kumaraguru. @ twitter credibility ranking of tweets on events# breakingnews. 2012.
7. A. Gupta and P. Kumaraguru. Twitter explodes with activity in mumbai blasts a lifeline or an unmonitored daemon in the lurking? 2012.
8. A. Gupta, H. Lamba, P. Kumaraguru, and A. Joshi. Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on twitter during hurricane sandy. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, pages 729-736. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013.
9. Z. Gyongyi and H. Garcia-Molina. Web spam taxonomy. In First international workshop on adversarial information retrieval on the web (AIRWeb 2005), 2005.
10. P. Kanske and S. A. Kotz. Leipzig affective norms for german: A reliability study. Behavior research methods, 42(4):987-991, 2010.
11. M. Mendoza, B. Poblete, and C. Castillo. Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we rt? In Proceedings of the first Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pages 71-79. ACM, 2010.
12. J. Redondo, I. Fraga, I. Padŕon, and M. Comesãna. The spanish adaptation of anew (affective norms for english words). Behavior research methods, 39(3):600-605, 2007.
13. E. Seo, P. Mohapatra, and T. Abdelzaher. Identifying rumors and their sources in social networks. In SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, pages 83891I-83891I. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2012.
14. E. Spyromitros-Xioufis, S. Papadopoulos, I. Kompatsiaris, G. Tsoumakas, and I. Vlahavas. An empirical study on the combination of surf features with vlad vectors for image search. In 13th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS), pages 1-4. IEEE, 2012.
15. G. Stringhini, C. Kruegel, and G. Vigna. Detecting spammers on social networks. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 1-9. ACM, 2010.
16. C. Yang, R. Harkreader, J. Zhang, S. Shin, and G. Gu. Analyzing spammers' social networks for fun and profit: A case study of cyber criminal ecosystem on twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, pages 71-80. ACM, 2012.