Designing state-space models with neural networks

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 459-464

  Korbicz, Jozef ^a   Mrugalski, Marcin ^a   Parisini, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZIELONA GÓRA   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Fault diagnosis; Neural networks; Non linear system identification; State space models

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DATA HANDLING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); LINEAR SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; STATE SPACE METHODS;

ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS; BOUNDED ERRORS; ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES; FAULT DETECTION SYSTEMS; GROUP METHOD OF DATA HANDLING; NEW APPROACHES; NON-LINEAR SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION; STATE - SPACE MODELS;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 84945545910     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20020721-6-es-1901.01630     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Angeline, P. (1995). Evolution Revolution: An intro-dution to the special track on genetic and evolutionary programing. IEEE Expert, 5, pp. 6-10.
2. Duch, W., J. Korbicz, L. Rutkowski and R. Tadeusiewicz (2000). Biocybernetyka i inynieria biome-dyczna 2000. Sieci neuronowe. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza Exit, Warszawa. Tom 6. (in Polish).
3. Edelmayer, A. (2000). Research of Quantitative and Qualitative FDI Methods Based on Data From Lublin Sugar Factory. Spec. Session IFAC Symp. SAFEPROCESS'2000. Prepr. IFAC Symp.: Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes: SAFEPROCESS'2000, June 14-16, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 331-358.
4. Farlow, S.J. (1984). Self-Organizing Methods in Modeling - GMDH Type Algorithms. Marcel Dekker, New York.
5. Fogel, E. and Y.F. Huang (1982). On the Value of Information in System Identyfication-Bounded Noise Case. Automatica, 18(2), pp. 229-238.
6. Hertz, J., R. Krogh, and G. Palmer (1991). Introduction to the neural computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
7. Ivakhnenko, A.G. and J.A. Muller (1995). Self-Organizing of Nets of Active Neurons. System Analysis Modelling Simulation, 20, pp. 93-106.
8. Koza, J.R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MA: The MIT Press, Cambridge.
9. Maksarow, D. and J. Norton (1996). Tuning noise bounds in state bounding. Proc. CESA'96 IMACS Multiconference, July 9-12, Lille, France, pp. 837-842.
10. Maksarow, D. and J. Norton (1996). State bounding with ellipsoidal set description of the uncertainty. Int. Journal of Control, 65(5), pp. 847-866.
11. Michalewicz, Z. (1996). Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, Berlin.
12. Milanese, M., J. Norton, H. Piet-Lahanier and E. Walter (Eds.) (1996). Bounding Approaches to System Identification. Plenum Press, New York.
13. Patton, R. J. and Chen J. (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis For Dynamic Systems. Kluwer Academic Publ, London.
14. Patton, R. J., Frank P. and Clark R.N. (Eds.) (2000). Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. Uciński, D. (1997). Measurement Optimization for Parameter Estimation in Distributed Systems. Technical University Press, Zielona Góra.
16. Walter, E. and L. Pronzato (1997). Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data. Springer, London.
17. Van Overschee, P. and De Moor B. (1994). N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica, 30(1), pp. 75-93.