Pragmatic, formative process evaluations of complex interventions and why we need more of them

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 69, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 925-926

  Evans, Rhiannon ^a   Scourfield, Jonathan ^a   Murphy, Simon ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GUIDELINE; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL POLICY; TERMINOLOGY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STANDARDS;

HUMANS; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84945492062     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204806     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014;68:101-2.
2. Moore G, Audrey A, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance. MRC Population Health Science Research Network, 2014.
3. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, eds. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass, 2002:1-23.
4. Medical Research Council. A Framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. MRC Health Services and Public Health Research Board, 2000.
5. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council, 2008.
6. Macintrye S, Petticrew M. Good intentions and received wisdoms are not enough. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:802-3.
7. Petticrew M, McKee M, Lock K, et al. In search of social equipoise. BMJ 2013;346:f4016.
8. Estyn. Behaviour in Wales: good practice in managing challenging behaviour. Cardiff: Estyn, 2006.
9. Evans R, Scourfield J, Murphy S. The unintended consequences of targeted interventions: young people's lived experiences of targeted social and emotional learning interventions. Br Educ Res J 2014. Publication Online First.
10. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 2003.
11. Ward V, Smith S, House A, et al. Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74:297-304.
12. Spoth R, Rohrbach L, Greenberg M, et al. Society for Prevention Research Type 2 Translational Task Force Members and Contributing Authors. Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: the Translation Science to Population Impact (TSci Impact) Framework. Prev Sci 2013;14:319-51.