Scientometric mapping of research on ‘Big Data’

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 727-741

  Singh, Vivek Kumar ^a   Banshal, Sumit Kumar ^a   Singhal, Khushboo ^a   Uddin, Ashraf ^a  

^a SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Big Data; Big Data research; Informetrics; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945463177     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1729-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics,14(5), 421–433.
2. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices. Scientometrics,82(2), 391–400.
3. Big Data: Science in the Petabyte Era. (2008). Nature,455(7209), 1–136.
4. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication and Society,15(5), 662–679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
5. Cocosila, M., Serenko, A., & Turel, O. (2011). Exploring the management information systems discipline: a scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC. Scientometrics,87(1), 1–16.
6. Dealing with Data. (2011). Science,331(6018), 639–806.
7. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics,69(1), 131–152.
8. Ekbia, H., Mattioli, M., Kouper, I., Arave, G., Ghazinejad, A., Bowman, T., et al. (2014). Big Data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23294.
9. Finardi, U. (2011). Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: the case of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics,89(1), 37–50.
10. Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999–2008. Scientometrics,86(2), 261–283.
11. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46), 16569–16572.
12. Howe, D., Costanzo, M., Fey, P., Gojobori, T., Hannick, L., Hide, W., & Rhee, S. Y. (2008). Big data: The future of biocuration. Nature,455(7209), 47–50.
13. Jagadish, H. V. (2015). Big Data and science: Myths and reality. Big Data Research,2, 49–52.
14. Jarić, I., Cvijanović, G., Knežević-Jarić, J., & Lenhardt, M. (2012). Trends in fisheries science from 2000 to 2009: A bibliometric study. Reviews in Fisheries Science,20(2), 70–79.
15. Jin, X., Wah, B. W., Cheng, X., & Wang, Y. (2015). Significance and challenges of Big Data research. Big Data Research,2, 59–64.
16. Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Babu, B. R., & Natarajan, M. (2012). Scientometric analysis of stem cell research: A comparative study of India and other countries. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management,6(2), 229–252.
17. Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Natarajan, M., & Babu, B. R. (2011). Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: A scientometric analysis, 1990–2009. Scientometrics,89(2), 501–522.
18. Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics,64(2), 121–132.
19. Lawani, S. M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: A bibliometric study. Ph.D. Thesis. Florida: School of library science, Florida State University.
20. Liesch, P. W., Håkanson, L., McGaughey, S. L., Middleton, S., & Cretchley, J. (2011). The evolution of the international business field: a scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics,88(1), 17–42.
21. Ma, R., Ni, C., & Qiu, J. (2008). Scientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science. Scientometrics,76(2), 245–260.
22. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Hung, A. (2011). Big Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute: Technical Report.
23. Onel, S., Zeid, A., & Kamarthi, S. (2011). The structure and analysis of nanotechnology co-author and citation networks. Scientometrics,89(1), 119–138.
24. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging “Big Data” research. Journal of Informetrics,7(3), 756–765.
25. Prathap, G. (2010). The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics,84(1), 167–172.
26. Singh, V. K., Uddin, A., & Pinto, D. (2015). Computer science research: The top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics,104(2), 529–553.
27. Singhal, K., Banshal, S. K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). The information technology knowledge infrastructure and research in South Asia. Journal of Scientometric Research,3(4), 134–142.
28. Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science,6(1), 33–38.
29. Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). Mapping the computer science research in SAARC countries. IETE Technical Review,31(4), 287–296.
30. Wu, Z., & Chin, O. B. (2014). From Big Data to data science: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Big Data Research,1, 1.