From Visual Features to Shared Future Visions for Naples 2050

Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 249-271

  Attardi, Raffaele ^a   De Rosa, Fortuna ^a   Di Palma, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Historic centre; Participation processes; Urban regeneration; Waterfront

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN RENEWAL; WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT;

CAMPANIA [ITALY]; ITALY; NAPLES; NAPOLI [CAMPANIA];

EID: 84945458689     PISSN: 1874463X     EISSN: 18744621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12061-015-9143-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Briggs, D. J., & France, J. (1980). Landscape evaluation: a comparative study. Journal of Environmental Management, 10, 263–275.
2. Cerreta, M., & De Toro, P. (2012). Assessing urban transformations: a SDSS for the master plan of Castel Capuano, Naples. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7334, 168–180.
3. Daniel, T. C. (1990). Measuring the quality of the natural environment. American Psychology, 45, 633–637.
4. Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Planning, 25, 267–281.
5. Daniel, T. C., & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural landscape. New York: Plenum Press.
6. De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34, 267–282.
7. Fusco Girard, L., & Nijkamp, P. (2000). Le Valutazioni per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio. Milano: Franco Angeli.
8. Fusco Girard, L., & Torre, C. M. (2012). The use of AHP in a multiactor evaluation for urban development programs: a case study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7334, 157–167.
9. Hudspeth, T. R. (1986). Visual preference as a tool for facilitating citizen participation in urban waterfront revitalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 23(4), 373–385.
10. Hull, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101–114.
11. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Humanscape: Environments for people. Ann Arbor: Ulrich’s.
12. Kingston, R. (1998). Web-based GIS for public participation decision making in the UK, Paper presented at the National Centre for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, Michigan.
13. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Suzuki, S. (2013). The rat race between world cities: in search of exceptional places by means of super-efficient data development analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 38, 67–77.
14. Nijkamp, P., & van Delft, A. (1977). Multicriteria analysis and regional decision making. Dordrecht: Springer.
15. Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., & de Kleijn, M. (2012). Facebook 4 Urban Facelift. PhD course workshop presentation, Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, July 2012.
16. Pérez, J. G. (2002). Ascertaining landscape perceptions and preferences with pair-wise photographs: planning rural tourism in Extremadura, Spain. Landscape Research, 27, 297–308.
17. Piano di Gestione del sito Unesco “Centro Storico di Napoli”,http://www.comune.napoli.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/14142
18. Piano di orientamento Strategico del Comune di Napoli,http://www.comune.napoli.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/10188
19. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review, January-February.
20. PROGETTO CTUR,http://urbact.eu/en/projects/port-cities/ctur/
21. PROGETTO HERO, http://urbact.eu/en/projects/urban-renewal/hero/homepage/
22. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
23. Saaty, T. L. (1992). Multicriteria decision making – the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
24. Saaty, T. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
25. Shelby, B., & Harris, R. (1985). Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts site visits, photography, and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 57–67.
26. Smit, A. J. (2011). The influence of district visual quality on location decisions of creative entrepreneurs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(2), 167–184.
27. Streetscapes Research Group, (2002). Streetscapes. Their Contribution to Wealth Creation and Quality of Life – Final Report. November 2002. The Robert Gordon University, The Macaulay Institute.
28. UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. Parigi: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
29. Zube, E. H. (1980). Environmental evaluation: Perception and public policy. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
30. Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1–33.